Chaoyue He, Xin Zhou, Xinjia Yu, Lei Zhang, Yan Zhang, Yi Wu · Feb 28, 2026
Researcher Tools
Human Feedback and Eval Paper Explorer
A focused feed for RLHF, preference data, rater protocols, agent evaluation, and LLM-as-judge research. Every paper includes structured metadata for quick triage.
Filter by tag
Xun Huang, Simeng Qin, Xiaoshuang Jia, Ranjie Duan, Huanqian Yan, Zhitao Zeng · Feb 26, 2026
- Owing to its conciseness and obscurity, classical Chinese can partially bypass existing safety constraints, exposing notable vulnerabilities in LLMs.
- To enhance readability and evaluation accuracy, we further design a classical Chinese to English translation module.
Dimitrios P. Panagoulias, Evangelia-Aikaterini Tsichrintzi, Georgios Savvidis, Evridiki Tsoureli-Nikita · Feb 26, 2026
- Human-in-the-loop validation is essential in safety-critical clinical AI, yet the transition between initial model inference and expert correction is rarely analyzed as a structured signal.
- Evaluation on 21 dermatological cases (21 complete AI physician pairs) em- ployed a four-level concordance framework comprising exact primary match rate (PMR), semantic similarity-adjusted rate (AMR), cross-category alignment, and…
Shentong Mo, Xufang Luo, Dongsheng Li · Feb 26, 2026
Joydeep Chandra, Satyam Kumar Navneet, Yong Zhang · Feb 26, 2026
- As mental health chatbots proliferate to address the global treatment gap, a critical question emerges: How do we design for relational safety the quality of interaction patterns that unfold across conversations rather than the correctness…
- We introduce TherapyProbe, a design probe methodology that generates actionable design knowledge by systematically exploring chatbot conversation trajectories through adversarial multi-agent simulation.
Boqi Chen, Xudong Liu, Jiachuan Peng, Marianne Frey-Marti, Bang Zheng, Kyle Lam · Feb 25, 2026
- Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown great potential in medical applications, yet existing benchmarks inadequately capture real-world clinical complexity.
- We introduce MEDSYN, a multilingual, multimodal benchmark of highly complex clinical cases with up to 7 distinct visual clinical evidence (CE) types per case.
Changjiang Gao, Zixian Huang, Kaichen Yang, Jiajun Chen, Jixing Li, Shujian Huang · Feb 25, 2026
- Analysis shows that, by enabling on-policy thinking language selection as an action during RL, ExpLang effectively extends the RL exploration space with diversified language preference and improves the RL exploitation outcome with leveraged…
Guanyi Qin, Xiaozhen Wang, Zhu Zhuo, Chang Han Low, Yuancan Xiao, Yibing Fu · Feb 25, 2026
- Existing AI systems offer binary safety verification or static detection, ignoring the phase-dependent nature of intraoperative reasoning.
- We introduce ResGo, a benchmark of laparoscopic frames annotated with Go Zone bounding boxes and clinician-authored rationales covering phase, exposure quality reasoning, next action and risk reminder.
David Anugraha, Vishakh Padmakumar, Diyi Yang · Feb 24, 2026
- Based on this formulation, we introduce SparkMe, a multi-agent LLM interviewer that performs deliberative planning via simulated conversation rollouts to select questions with high expected utility.
- The code, datasets, and evaluation protocols for SparkMe are available as open-source at https://github.com/SALT-NLP/SparkMe.
Xinfeng Li, Shenyu Dai, Kelong Zheng, Yue Xiao, Gelei Deng, Wei Dong · Feb 24, 2026
- Large language model (LLM) agents are rapidly becoming trusted copilots in high-stakes domains like software development and healthcare.
- However, this deepening trust introduces a novel attack surface: Agent-Mediated Deception (AMD), where compromised agents are weaponized against their human users.
Anna Martin-Boyle, William Humphreys, Martha Brown, Cara Leckey, Harmanpreet Kaur · Feb 24, 2026
- Current evaluation metrics for testing LLM reliability are primarily automated approaches that prioritize efficiency and scalability, but lack contextual nuance and fail to reflect how scientific domain experts assess LLM outputs in…
- We validated this schema through contextual inquiries with 10 additional scientists, which showed not only which errors experts naturally identify but also how structured evaluation schemas can help them detect previously overlooked issues.
Cathy Shyr, Yan Hu, Rory J. Tinker, Thomas A. Cassini, Kevin W. Byram, Rizwan Hamid · Feb 23, 2026
- Existing artificial intelligence approaches typically optimize individual components of phenotyping but do not operationalize the full clinical workflow of extracting features from clinical text, standardizing them to Human Phenotype…
- Using clinician-curated HPO terms as the gold standard, RARE-PHENIX consistently outperformed a state-of-the-art deep learning baseline (PhenoBERT) across ontology-based similarity and precision-recall-F1 metrics in end-to-end evaluation…
Jingzhuo Wu, Jiajun Zhang, Keyan Jin, Dehua Ma, Junbo Wang · Feb 23, 2026
- To address this, we introduce the Style-Adaptive Multi-Agent System (SAMAS), a novel framework that treats style preservation as a signal processing task.
- Extensive experiments on translation benchmarks show that SAMAS achieves competitive semantic accuracy against strong baselines, primarily by leveraging its statistically significant advantage in style fidelity.
Rizhuo Huang, Yifan Feng, Rundong Xue, Shihui Ying, Jun-Hai Yong, Chuan Shi · Feb 23, 2026
- Additionally, we present HyperDocRED, a rigorously annotated benchmark for document-level knowledge hypergraph extraction.
Victoria Blake, Mathew Miller, Jamie Novak, Sze-yuan Ooi, Blanca Gallego · Feb 20, 2026
- The framework was evaluated on five lexically heterogeneous clinical concepts against a manually curated benchmark and gold-standard concept sets.
- Results Across all concepts, CUICurate produced substantially larger and more complete concept sets than the manual benchmarks whilst matching human precision.
Adrian Cosma, Cosmin Dumitrache, Emilian Radoi · Feb 19, 2026
- As platforms increasingly rely on patient ratings and feedback, clinicians face growing pressure to maintain satisfaction scores, even though these evaluations often reflect communication quality more than clinical accuracy.
Priyaranjan Pattnayak, Sanchari Chowdhuri · Feb 18, 2026
- Safety alignment of large language models (LLMs) is mostly evaluated in English and contract-bound, leaving multilingual vulnerabilities understudied.
- We introduce Indic Jailbreak Robustness (IJR), a judge-free benchmark for adversarial safety across 12 Indic and South Asian languages (2.1 Billion speakers), covering 45216 prompts in JSON (contract-bound) and Free (naturalistic) tracks.
Yuyan Bu, Xiaohao Liu, ZhaoXing Ren, Yaodong Yang, Juntao Dai · Feb 18, 2026
- The widespread deployment of large language models (LLMs) across linguistic communities necessitates reliable multilingual safety alignment.
- In this work, we propose a resource-efficient method for improving multilingual safety alignment.
Jeffrey T. H. Wong, Zixi Zhang, Junyi Liu, Yiren Zhao · Feb 18, 2026
- Existing Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) typically rely on static, homogeneous model configurations, limiting their ability to exploit the distinct strengths of differently post-trained models.
- To address this, we introduce Team-of-Thoughts, a novel MAS architecture that leverages the complementary capabilities of heterogeneous agents via an orchestrator-tool paradigm.
Nivya Talokar, Ayush K Tarun, Murari Mandal, Maksym Andriushchenko, Antoine Bosselut · Feb 18, 2026
- LLM-based agents execute real-world workflows via tools and memory.
- We introduce STING (Sequential Testing of Illicit N-step Goal execution), an automated red-teaming framework that constructs a step-by-step illicit plan grounded in a benign persona and iteratively probes a target agent with adaptive…
Protocol Hubs
Benchmark Hubs
Metric Hubs
- Accuracy & Pass Rate Metric Papers (88)
- Accuracy Metric Papers (82)
- Accuracy & Pass Rate Metric Papers In CS.CL (63)
- Accuracy & Pass Rate Metric Papers + Automatic Metrics (74)
- Accuracy In CS.CL Papers (58)
- Accuracy & Pass Rate Metric Papers In CS.AI (58)
- Accuracy + Automatic Metrics Metric Papers (70)
- Accuracy + Automatic Metrics Metric Papers (Last 120 Days) (53)
- Accuracy + Automatic Metrics Metric Papers (Last 90 Days) (51)
- Accuracy + Automatic Metrics Metric Papers (Last 30 Days) (47)
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.