HFEPX Benchmark Hub
Aime or Alpacaeval or MMLU Benchmark Papers
Updated from current HFEPX corpus (2026-07-16). This page tracks 60 papers reporting Aime or Alpacaeval or MMLU benchmark evidence, with protocol and metric context for comparison.
HFEPX Benchmark Hub
Updated from current HFEPX corpus (2026-07-16). This page tracks 60 papers reporting Aime or Alpacaeval or MMLU benchmark evidence, with protocol and metric context for comparison.
Use this page for benchmark-matched method comparisons and eval protocol selection. Quality band: High .
High-Signal Coverage
100.0%
60 / 60 sampled papers are not low-signal flagged.
Replication-Ready Set
35
Papers with explicit benchmark + metric + eval mode fields.
Quality Controls
6.7%
4 papers report calibration/adjudication/IAA controls.
Primary action: Start with the top 2 benchmark-matched papers, then compare evaluation modes in the protocol matrix.
Ranked by protocol completeness so you can quickly find papers suitable for comparison studies.
Jul 2, 2026 · Citations: 0 · Score: 8.5
Eval: Automatic Metrics, Simulation Env · Metrics: Accuracy
Jun 24, 2026 · Citations: 0 · Score: 8.5
Eval: Automatic Metrics · Metrics: Accuracy
Apr 13, 2026 · Citations: 0 · Score: 7.5
Eval: Llm As Judge · Metrics: Precision
Apr 2, 2026 · Citations: 0 · Score: 7.5
Eval: Automatic Metrics · Metrics: Accuracy
Mar 28, 2026 · Citations: 0 · Score: 7.5
Eval: Llm As Judge, Automatic Metrics · Metrics: Accuracy
Mar 23, 2026 · Citations: 0 · Score: 7.5
Eval: Automatic Metrics · Metrics: Accuracy
Compare protocol ingredients quickly before deep-reading full papers.
| Paper | Eval Modes | Human Feedback | Metrics | Quality Controls |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Will Scaling Improve Social Simulation with LLMs? Jul 2, 2026 | Automatic Metrics, Simulation Env | Not reported | Accuracy | Calibration |
| Cliff Tokens: Identifying Single-Token Failure Triggers in LLM Mathematical Reasoning Jun 24, 2026 | Automatic Metrics | Pairwise Preference | Accuracy, Pass@64 | Not reported |
| Hidden Measurement Error in LLM Pipelines Distorts Annotation, Evaluation, and Benchmarking Apr 13, 2026 | Llm As Judge | Demonstrations | Precision, Agreement | Not reported |
| Diagnosing Translated Benchmarks: An Automated Quality Assurance Study of the EU20 Benchmark Suite Apr 2, 2026 | Automatic Metrics | Not reported | Accuracy | Calibration, Gold Questions |
| PubMed Reasoner: Dynamic Reasoning-based Retrieval for Evidence-Grounded Biomedical Question Answering Mar 28, 2026 | Llm As Judge, Automatic Metrics | Expert Verification | Accuracy, Relevance | Not reported |
| DSPA: Dynamic SAE Steering for Data-Efficient Preference Alignment Mar 23, 2026 | Automatic Metrics | Pairwise Preference | Accuracy | Not reported |
| PARTREP: Learning What to Repeat for Decoder-only LLMs Jul 2, 2026 | Automatic Metrics | Not reported | Nll, Cost | Not reported |
| Closing the Activation-Cone Blind Spot: Response-Time Probing and Unified Defense Jun 28, 2026 | Automatic Metrics | Not reported | Auroc, Cost | Not reported |
| Holistic Data Scheduler for LLM Pre-training via Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning Jun 23, 2026 | Automatic Metrics | Not reported | Perplexity | Not reported |
| RoPE-Aware Bit Allocation for KV-Cache Quantization Jun 23, 2026 | Automatic Metrics | Not reported | Mae, Mse | Not reported |
Gap: Human feedback
Human feedback is present in 12 of 60 papers.
Gap: Quality controls
Quality controls is present in 4 of 60 papers.
Strong: Benchmarks
Benchmarks is present in 60 of 60 papers.
Strong: Metrics
Metrics is present in 38 of 60 papers.
Gap: Known rater population
Known rater population is present in 6 of 60 papers.
Gap: Known annotation unit
Known annotation unit is present in 8 of 60 papers.
Evaluation Modes
Human Feedback Mix
Top Benchmarks
Top Metrics
Caleb Ziems, William Held, Su Doga Karaca, David Grusky, Tatsunori Hashimoto · Jul 2, 2026 · Citations: 0
We use scaling laws to study the relationship between LLMs' compute scale, general capability benchmarks, and the fidelity of social simulation in three representative sub-domains: opinion modeling, behavioral simulation, and longitudinal…
Xiangdong Zhang, Debing Zhang, Shaofeng Zhang, Xiaohan Qin, Yu Cheng · May 24, 2026 · Citations: 0
Abstract shows limited direct human-feedback or evaluation-protocol detail; use as adjacent methodological context.
Andikawati P Widjaja, Yongjun Kim, Hyounghun Kim, Jaeho Lee · Jul 2, 2026 · Citations: 0
Across eight benchmarks (including MMLU, GSM8K, and RULER) and three model families (Qwen2.5, Llama3.2, Gemma4), PartRep retains most of the gains of full repetition while using only 59.4\% of its KV cache and 79.0\% of its prefill FLOPs.
Kevin Yandoka Denamganaï · May 27, 2026 · Citations: 0
Self-evolving scientific agents capable of conquering the hard tail of formal mathematics require Compositional Learning Behaviours (CLBs) -- the capacity to ground and recombine novel symbolic structures in context, beyond mere…
Subhadip Mitra · Jun 28, 2026 · Citations: 0
Inference-time safety methods for large language models have proliferated, yet no systematic comparison exists.
Steven Kolawole, Virginia Smith · Jun 25, 2026 · Citations: 0
Abstract shows limited direct human-feedback or evaluation-protocol detail; use as adjacent methodological context.
Xiangyue Liu, Zijian Zhang, Miles Yang, Zhao Zhong, Liefeng Bo · Apr 9, 2026 · Citations: 0
Abstract shows limited direct human-feedback or evaluation-protocol detail; use as adjacent methodological context.
Jaeyong Ko, Pilsung Kang, Yukyung Lee · Jun 24, 2026 · Citations: 0
Across seven models and three mathematical reasoning benchmarks (GSM1K, MATH500, AIME 2025), cliff tokens act as failure triggers; deleting the first cliff token and resampling recovers pass@64 to 1.0, while keeping it limits recovery to…
Tianyu Dong, Yangyang Liu, Jiang Zhou, Xinwei Wu, Xiaohu Zhao · Jun 24, 2026 · Citations: 0
We conduct experiments on 2 LLMs across 5 low-resource languages and 3 benchmarks.
Chenhao Dang, Jing Ma, Mingjie Liao · Jun 23, 2026 · Citations: 0
On The Pile benchmark, HDS reaches the final validation perplexity of the next best method with 44% fewer training iterations.
Fengfeng Liang, Yuechen Zhang, Jiaya Jia · Jun 23, 2026 · Citations: 0
Abstract shows limited direct human-feedback or evaluation-protocol detail; use as adjacent methodological context.
Ali Asgarov, Umid Suleymanov, Aadyant Khatri · Oct 31, 2025 · Citations: 0
We introduce SIGMA (Search-Augmented On-Demand Knowledge Integration for AGentic Mathematical reAsoning), a unified framework that orchestrates specialized agents to independently reason, perform targeted searches, and synthesize findings…
Glenn Matlin, Chandreyi Chakraborty, Saehee Eom, Mika Okamoto, Rayan Castilla · Jun 17, 2026 · Citations: 0
Training-data attribution measures how strongly each training document influences a model's predictions on a benchmark, but document-level scores are too noisy to identify which corpus regions support which capabilities, and prior work has…
Anany Kotawala · May 28, 2026 · Citations: 0
Across two public LLM leaderboards, many displayed pairwise rankings do not meet a conventional paired-test resolution target under the actual paired evaluation design: 11 of 40 Open LLM Leaderboard v1 pairwise comparisons and 4 of 9…
Siddharth Boppana, Annabel Ma, Max Loeffler, Raphael Sarfati, Eric Bigelow · Mar 5, 2026 · Citations: 0
Abstract shows limited direct human-feedback or evaluation-protocol detail; use as adjacent methodological context.
Tanmoy Chakraborty, Ayan Sengupta, Suparna Bhattacharya, Partha Pratim Chakrabarti, Amlan Chakrabarti · May 28, 2026 · Citations: 0
Large language models (LLMs) frequently achieve impressive scores on standardized benchmarks, yet accuracy alone offers a limited view of their capabilities.
Woomin Song, Saket Dingliwal, Sai Muralidhar Jayanthi, Bhavana Ganesh, Jinwoo Shin · Jun 5, 2025 · Citations: 0
Extensive evaluations across multiple models and reasoning tasks (AIME-2024, GPQA-Diamond, and LiveCodeBench) demonstrate that STAND reduces inference latency by 60-65% compared to standard autoregressive decoding while maintaining…
Andrea Sassella, Andrea Chizzola, Tommaso Bianchi, Luca Alessandrelli, Mark James Carman · May 8, 2026 · Citations: 0
This report benchmarks the performance of ENGINEERING Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A.'s EngGPT2MoE-16B-A3B LLM, a 16B parameter Mixture of Experts (MoE) model with 3B active parameters.
Qiyong Zhong, Mao Zheng, Mingyang Song, Xin Lin, Jie Sun · May 8, 2026 · Citations: 0
To address this, we propose SOD, a step-wise on-policy distillation framework for small language model agents, which adaptively reweights distillation strength at each step based on step-level divergence.
Tsuyoshi Okita · May 8, 2026 · Citations: 0
With a 7B-parameter LLM whose weights are entirely frozen, CIKA achieves 69.7\% on the contamination-free Omni-MATH-Rule benchmark and 64.0\% overall, compared to 60.5\% for o1-mini, and 97.2\% on GSM8K, 46--50\% on AIME 2024--2026, and…
Qianjia Cheng, Yuchen Zhang, Zhilin Wang, Yuxin Zuo, Shunkai Zhang · May 7, 2026 · Citations: 0
Paradoxically, we observe that tool-enabled evaluation can degrade reasoning performance even when the strong thinking models make almost no actual tool calls.
Solomon Messing · Apr 13, 2026 · Citations: 0
LLM evaluations drive which models get deployed, what safety standards get adopted, which research conclusions get published, and how projections of AI's labor-market impact get made.
Xiaoyu Xu, Minxin Du, Kun Fang, Yaxin Xiao, Zhicong Huang · Jan 29, 2026 · Citations: 0
Furthermore, to facilitate rigorous evaluation, we introduce PCH, a unified benchmark encompassing Personal, Copyrighted, and Harmful content, alongside two symmetric metrics, Forget Degree (F.D.) and Retain Utility (R.U.), to…
Lin Yao · Apr 20, 2026 · Citations: 0
Abstract shows limited direct human-feedback or evaluation-protocol detail; use as adjacent methodological context.
Weiqin Wang, Yile Wang, Kehao Chen, Hui Huang · Dec 17, 2025 · Citations: 0
We conduct experiments across various models and benchmarks, experimental results show that SCOPE consistently outperforms recent baselines.
Pere Martra · Dec 27, 2025 · Citations: 0
We evaluated seven expansion ratio configurations using comprehensive benchmarks assessing factual knowledge, mathematical reasoning, language comprehension, instruction-following, and truthfulness.
Weitao Li, Boran Xiang, Xiaolong Wang, Zhinan Gou, Weizhi Ma · Aug 8, 2025 · Citations: 0
Experiments on open-domain QA, MMLU-Pro, medical, and mathematical reasoning tasks show that UR^2, built on Qwen-2.5-3/7B and LLaMA-3.1-8B, consistently outperforms existing RAG and RL baselines, and achieves performance comparable to…
Yijia Fan, Jusheng Zhang, Kaitong Cai, Jing Yang, Chengpei Tang · Nov 17, 2025 · Citations: 0
To address this, we introduce the Dynamic Auction-based Language Agent (DALA), a novel framework that treats communication bandwidth as a scarce and tradable resource.
Zeguan Xiao, Yun Chen, Guanhua Chen, Ke Tang · Jun 11, 2025 · Citations: 0
Direct Alignment Algorithms (DAAs), such as Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) and Simple Preference Optimization (SimPO), have emerged as efficient alternatives to Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) algorithms for aligning…
Shangqing Tu, Yaxuan Li, Yushi Bai, Lei Hou, Juanzi Li · Oct 9, 2025 · Citations: 0
Our method features a specialized judge model trained with out-of-distribution data (AIME 2022, AIME 2023, and MATH 500) using oversampling techniques to accurately predict answer equivalence from partial reasoning traces, achieving 0.7072…
Pengxiang Li, Yefan Zhou, Dilxat Muhtar, Lu Yin, Shilin Yan · Aug 27, 2025 · Citations: 0
Empirical evaluations of LLaDA-8B and Dream-7B across multiple tasks show that Prophet reduces the number of decoding steps by up to 3.4x while preserving high generation quality.
Shangjian Yin, Shining Liang, Wenbiao Ding, Yuli Qian, Zhouxing Shi · Oct 8, 2025 · Citations: 0
Despite its small size, fine-tuning Llama-3-8B-Base on PiKa-SFT even outperforms the official Llama-3-8B-Instruct model trained on over 10M proprietary examples on widely used benchmarks such as AlpacaEval 2.0 and Arena-Hard.
Zhichao Wang · Oct 27, 2025 · Citations: 0
This paper proposes Group-relative Implicit Fine-Tuning (GIFT), a reinforcement learning framework for aligning large language models (LLMs) that unifies on-policy optimization with implicit preference learning.
Klaudia Thellmann, Bernhard Stadler, Michael Färber · Apr 2, 2026 · Citations: 0
Machine-translated benchmark datasets reduce costs and offer scale, but noise, loss of structure, and uneven quality weaken confidence.
Ante Wang, Weizhi Ma, Yang Liu · Nov 18, 2025 · Citations: 0
Abstract shows limited direct human-feedback or evaluation-protocol detail; use as adjacent methodological context.
Zhenpeng Su, Leiyu Pan, Xue Bai, Dening Liu, Guanting Dong · Aug 11, 2025 · Citations: 0
We present Klear-Reasoner, a model with long reasoning capabilities that demonstrates careful deliberation during problem solving, achieving outstanding performance across multiple benchmarks.
M. Ali Bayram, Ali Arda Fincan, Ahmet Semih Gümüş, Sercan Karakaş, Banu Diri · Aug 19, 2025 · Citations: 0
We further validate practical utility with downstream sentence embedding benchmarks under a strict random initialization control to isolate tokenizer inductive bias.
G. Ciarfaglia, A. Rosanova, S. Cipolla, J. Bartoli, A. Di Domenico · Mar 17, 2026 · Citations: 0
EngGPT2 is trained on 2.5 trillion tokens - less than Qwen3's 36T or Llama3's 15T - and delivers performance on key benchmarks, including MMLU-Pro, GSM8K, IFEval and HumanEval, comparable to dense models in the 8B-16B range, while requiring…
Yiqing Zhang, Xiaozhong Liu, Fabricio Murai · Mar 28, 2026 · Citations: 0
In this context, we introduce PubMed Reasoner, a biomedical QA agent composed of three stages: self-critic query refinement evaluates MeSH terms for coverage, alignment, and redundancy to enhance PubMed queries based on partial (metadata)…
Zara Siddique, Irtaza Khalid, Liam D. Turner, Luis Espinosa-Anke · Mar 7, 2025 · Citations: 0
When optimized on the BBQ dataset, our individually tuned steering vectors achieve average improvements of 12.8% on BBQ, 8.3% on CLEAR-Bias, and 1% on StereoSet, and show improvements over prompting and Self-Debias in all cases, and…
Richard J. Young · Mar 27, 2026 · Citations: 0
Abstract shows limited direct human-feedback or evaluation-protocol detail; use as adjacent methodological context.
Hao Liang, Zhengyang Zhao, Meiyi Qiang, Mingrui Chen, Lu Ma · Mar 27, 2026 · Citations: 0
Abstract shows limited direct human-feedback or evaluation-protocol detail; use as adjacent methodological context.
Md. Asraful Haque, Aasar Mehdi, Maaz Mahboob, Tamkeen Fatima · Mar 18, 2026 · Citations: 0
The system was evaluated across 650 queries from five diverse benchmarks: TimeQA v2, FreshQA v2, HaluEval General, MMLU Global Facts, and TruthfulQA.
Muhammed Saeed, Simon Razniewski · Mar 25, 2026 · Citations: 0
Benchmarks such as MMLU suggest flagship language models approach factuality saturation, with scores above 90\%.
Kefan Song, Amir Moeini, Peng Wang, Lei Gong, Rohan Chandra · May 21, 2025 · Citations: 0
Abstract shows limited direct human-feedback or evaluation-protocol detail; use as adjacent methodological context.
James Wedgwood, Aashiq Muhamed, Mona T. Diab, Virginia Smith · Mar 23, 2026 · Citations: 0
Preference alignment is usually achieved by weight-updating training on preference data, which adds substantial alignment-stage compute and provides limited mechanistic visibility.
Hangeol Chang, Changsun Lee, Seungjoon Rho, Junho Yeo, Jong Chul Ye · Mar 19, 2026 · Citations: 0
Abstract shows limited direct human-feedback or evaluation-protocol detail; use as adjacent methodological context.
Xiaoyin Chen, Canwen Xu, Yite Wang, Boyi Liu, Zhewei Yao · Mar 19, 2026 · Citations: 0
Abstract shows limited direct human-feedback or evaluation-protocol detail; use as adjacent methodological context.
Arushi Rai, Qiang Zhang, Hanqing Zeng, Yunkai Zhang, Dipesh Tamboli · Mar 19, 2026 · Citations: 0
Recent test-time alignment methods offer a lightweight alternative, but have been explored mainly for preference alignment rather than reasoning.
Mohsen Hariri, Amirhossein Samandar, Michael Hinczewski, Vipin Chaudhary · Oct 5, 2025 · Citations: 0
We present a principled Bayesian evaluation framework that replaces Pass@k and average accuracy over N trials (avg@N) with posterior estimates of a model's underlying success probability and credible intervals, yielding stable rankings and…
Cem Uluoglakci, Tugba Taskaya Temizel · Mar 18, 2026 · Citations: 0
We also release HypoTermQA-Enhanced, a benchmark for hallucination tendency strengthened through multiple validations.
Juming Xiong, Kevin Guo, Congning Ni, Chao Yan, Katherine Brown · Mar 9, 2026 · Citations: 0
Recent self-consistency-based approaches further improve accuracy but require sampling and aggregating multiple reasoning trajectories, leading to substantial additional computational overhead.
Xinran Zhang · Mar 16, 2026 · Citations: 0
How safety supervision is written may matter more than the explicit identity content it contains.
Khashayar Alavi, Zhastay Yeltay, Lucie Flek, Akbar Karimi · Nov 10, 2025 · Citations: 0
These perturbations include punctuation noise with three intensities (10%, 30%, 50%), plus real-world and human-like typos (WikiTypo, R2ATA).
Gowtham, Sai Rupesh, Sanjay Kumar, Saravanan, Venkata Chaithanya · Mar 14, 2026 · Citations: 0
Abstract shows limited direct human-feedback or evaluation-protocol detail; use as adjacent methodological context.
Vinod Raman, Hilal Asi, Satyen Kale · May 17, 2025 · Citations: 0
Abstract shows limited direct human-feedback or evaluation-protocol detail; use as adjacent methodological context.
Victor Ojewale, Inioluwa Deborah Raji, Suresh Venkatasubramanian · Jun 25, 2025 · Citations: 0
Multi-lingual competence in large language models is often evaluated via static data benchmarks such as Belebele, M-MMLU and M-GSM.
Konrad Staniszewski, Adrian Łańcucki · Nov 3, 2025 · Citations: 0
We test KVTC with Llama 3, Mistral NeMo, and R1-Qwen 2.5 models across benchmarks including AIME25, GSM8K, LiveCodeBench, LongBench, MATH-500, MMLU, Qasper and RULER.
Eric Yocam, Varghese Vaidyan, Gurcan Comert, Paris Kalathas, Yong Wang · Mar 10, 2026 · Citations: 0
Abstract shows limited direct human-feedback or evaluation-protocol detail; use as adjacent methodological context.
Gregory Yauney, Shahzaib Saqib Warraich, Swabha Swayamdipta · Oct 9, 2025 · Citations: 0
We introduce a meta-evaluation measure for micro-benchmarking which investigates how well a micro-benchmark can rank two models as a function of their performance difference on the full benchmark.