Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

HFEPX · Eval paper review

AtManRL: Towards Faithful Reasoning via Differentiable Attention Saliency

Max Henning Höth, Kristian Kersting, Björn Deiseroth, Letitia Parcalabescu

Published

Apr 17, 2026

Citations

0

Trust level

Low

Usefulness score

5/100 (Low)

Extraction confidence

45% (Low)

Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.

Rater population

Not reported

Signals refreshed

Oct 22, 2026

Open arXiv Find implementation Shortlist (0) RSS feed

Tags

Automatic Metrics

Should you rely on this paper?

This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.

Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A benchmark-and-metrics comparison anchor.

What to verify

Validate the evaluation procedure and quality controls in the full paper before operational use.

Main weakness

This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.

Human feedback signal
Not explicit
Not explicit in abstract metadata
Evaluation signal
Detected
Eval setup described
Usefulness for eval research
5/100
Adjacent candidate

Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.

If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here

Human Eval Papers LLM-as-Judge Papers Pairwise Preference Papers Tool-Use Evaluation Search

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) increasingly rely on chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning to solve complex tasks, yet a reasoning trace may merely accompany the final answer rather than causally contribute to it or faithfully reflect how it was reached. We introduce differentiable attention manipulation to train salient reasoning with reinforcement learning -- method which we call AtManRL. By optimizing an additive attention mask that identifies the CoT tokens needed to recover the model's answer, we derive a saliency reward and combine it with an outcome reward in GRPO with decoupled advantages. Because both saliency and faithfulness depend strongly on trace length, we evaluate against a sweep of length-penalty baselines that traces the trade-off a pure length penalty can reach, rather than against a single baseline. Across three models (Qwen2.5-3B, Granite-3.3-2B, and Phi-4-mini) and four benchmarks (GSM8K, MMLU, ProofWriter, and QuestBench), AtManRL sits above this trade-off curve by 3.9-4.0pp in saliency, measured as answer changes under mistake injection, and by 5.7-7.7pp in faithfulness, measured as hint verbalization under hint injection, while matching the accuracy of baselines of similar length. These results suggest that training explicitly for saliency is a promising route towards chain-of-thought reasoning that is more faithful to the model's actual decision process.

What we could verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

missing

None explicit

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

"Large language models (LLMs) increasingly rely on chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning to solve complex tasks, yet a reasoning trace may merely accompany the final answer rather than causally contribute to it or faithfully reflect how it was reached."

Evaluation Modes

partial

Automatic Metrics

Includes extracted eval setup.

"Large language models (LLMs) increasingly rely on chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning to solve complex tasks, yet a reasoning trace may merely accompany the final answer rather than causally contribute to it or faithfully reflect how it was reached."

Quality Controls

missing

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"Large language models (LLMs) increasingly rely on chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning to solve complex tasks, yet a reasoning trace may merely accompany the final answer rather than causally contribute to it or faithfully reflect how it was reached."

Benchmarks / Datasets

partial

MMLU, GSM8K, Questbench

Useful for quick benchmark comparison.

"Across three models (Qwen2.5-3B, Granite-3.3-2B, and Phi-4-mini) and four benchmarks (GSM8K, MMLU, ProofWriter, and QuestBench), AtManRL sits above this trade-off curve by 3.9-4.0pp in saliency, measured as answer changes under mistake injection, and by 5.7-7.7pp in faithfulness, measured as hint verbalization under hint injection, while matching the accuracy of baselines of similar length."

Reported Metrics

partial

Accuracy, Faithfulness

Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.

"Because both saliency and faithfulness depend strongly on trace length, we evaluate against a sweep of length-penalty baselines that traces the trade-off a pure length penalty can reach, rather than against a single baseline."

Benchmarks and datasets

MMLUGSM8KQuestbench

Reported metrics

accuracyfaithfulness
Human feedback details
Uses human feedback
No
Feedback types
None
Rater population
Not reported
Expertise required
Math
Evaluation details
Evaluation modes
Automatic Metrics
Agentic eval
None
Quality controls
Not reported
Evidence quality
Low
Use this page as
Background context only

Research brief

Metadata summary

Large language models (LLMs) increasingly rely on chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning to solve complex tasks, yet a reasoning trace may merely accompany the final answer rather than causally contribute to it or faithfully reflect how it was reached.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key takeaways

  • Large language models (LLMs) increasingly rely on chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning to solve complex tasks, yet a reasoning trace may merely accompany the final answer rather than causally contribute to it or faithfully reflect how it was reached.
  • We introduce differentiable attention manipulation to train salient reasoning with reinforcement learning -- method which we call AtManRL.
  • By optimizing an additive attention mask that identifies the CoT tokens needed to recover the model's answer, we derive a saliency reward and combine it with an outcome reward in GRPO with decoupled advantages.

Researcher actions

  • Compare this paper against others mentioning MMLU and GSM8K.
  • Validate inferred eval signals (Automatic metrics) against the full paper.
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended queries

MMLU GSM8K Accuracy

Contribution summary

  • We introduce differentiable attention manipulation to train salient reasoning with reinforcement learning -- method which we call AtManRL.
  • Because both saliency and faithfulness depend strongly on trace length, we evaluate against a sweep of length-penalty baselines that traces the trade-off a pure length penalty can reach, rather than against a single baseline.
  • Across three models (Qwen2.5-3B, Granite-3.3-2B, and Phi-4-mini) and four benchmarks (GSM8K, MMLU, ProofWriter, and QuestBench), AtManRL sits above this trade-off curve by 3.9-4.0pp in saliency, measured as answer changes under mistake…

Why it matters for eval

  • Across three models (Qwen2.5-3B, Granite-3.3-2B, and Phi-4-mini) and four benchmarks (GSM8K, MMLU, ProofWriter, and QuestBench), AtManRL sits above this trade-off curve by 3.9-4.0pp in saliency, measured as answer changes under mistake…

Researcher checklist

  • Human feedback protocol is explicit

    No explicit human feedback protocol detected.

  • Evaluation mode is explicit

    Detected: Automatic Metrics

  • Quality control reporting appears

    No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.

  • Benchmark or dataset anchors are present

    Detected: MMLU, GSM8K, Questbench

  • Metric reporting is present

    Detected: accuracy, faithfulness