Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Researcher Tools

Human Feedback and Eval Paper Explorer

A focused feed for RLHF, preference data, rater protocols, agent evaluation, and LLM-as-judge research. Every paper includes structured metadata for quick triage.

Total papers: 1 Search mode: keyword Shortlist (0) RSS

Featured Papers

Popular high-signal papers with direct links to full protocol pages.

Weekly Eval Paper Digest

The top RLHF, evaluation, and human feedback papers — curated and summarized every Friday.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Start Here By Objective

Pick your immediate research objective and jump directly to high-signal pages, not generic search.

Scale Your Evaluation Team

Need human evaluators for your benchmark or preference study? OpenTrain sources pre-vetted domain experts into your annotation pipeline.

Preserving Fairness and Safety in Quantized LLMs Through Critical Weight Protection

Muhammad Alif Al Hakim, Alfan Farizki Wicaksono, Fajri Koto · Jan 17, 2026

Citations: 0

Match reason: Matched by broad semantic/index fallback.

Score: 30% Moderate protocol signal Freshness: Cold Status: Ready
Automatic Metrics Multilingual
  • For fairness, we evaluate English, French, Dutch, Spanish, and Turkish; for safety, we focus on English, Korean, and Arabic.
  • To address these risks, we introduce Critical Weight Protection, a novel technique that identifies and preserves fairness- and safety-critical weights during quantization.
Open paper