Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Researcher Tools

Human Feedback and Eval Paper Explorer

A focused feed for RLHF, preference data, rater protocols, agent evaluation, and LLM-as-judge research. Every paper includes structured metadata for quick triage.

Total papers: 1 Search mode: keyword Shortlist (0) RSS

Featured Papers

Popular high-signal papers with direct links to full protocol pages.

Start Here By Objective

Pick your immediate research objective and jump directly to high-signal pages, not generic search.

Scale Your Evaluation Team

Need human evaluators for your benchmark or preference study? OpenTrain sources pre-vetted domain experts into your annotation pipeline.

Leveraging a four-quadrant approach for evaluating Redpine Science

Filip Dorm, Leonora Vesterbacka · Oct 6, 2026

Citations: 0

Match reason: Matched by broad semantic/index fallback.

Score: 45% Moderate protocol signal Freshness: Hot Status: Ready
Automatic Metrics General
  • On ScholarQABench SciFact, the public answer-quality benchmark reported here, an agent with Redpine Science answers 94.4% of claims correctly against 87.6% with no retrieval.
  • On the expert-validated question set, an agent with Redpine Science states 80.1% of the required claims against 70.2% for an agent restricted to web search.
Open paper