Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies
← Back to explorer

Tag: Law

Law evaluation papers that call for domain expertise or specialist review (73 papers).

Papers in tag: 73

Need Law evaluators for your project?

Post a Job →

Research Utility Snapshot

Evaluation Modes

  • Automatic Metrics (11)
  • Simulation Env (3)
  • Human Eval (2)

Human Feedback Types

  • Pairwise Preference (4)
  • Expert Verification (3)
  • Rubric Rating (3)

Required Expertise

  • Law (20)
  • Coding (5)
  • Math (2)
Sabiá-4 Technical Report

Thiago Laitz, Thales Sales Almeida, Hugo Abonizio, Roseval Malaquias Junior, Giovana Kerche Bonás, Marcos Piau · Mar 10, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference Automatic Metrics LawCoding
  • The models were developed through a four-stage training pipeline: continued pre-training on Portuguese and Brazilian legal corpora, long-context extension to 128K tokens, supervised fine-tuning on instruction data spanning chat, code, legal…
  • We evaluate the models on six benchmark categories: conversational capabilities in Brazilian Portuguese, knowledge of Brazilian legislation, long-context understanding, instruction following, standardized exams, and agentic capabilities…
\$OneMillion-Bench: How Far are Language Agents from Human Experts?

Yang Liu, Jiaqi Li, Jun Bai, Qianyu Yang, Xiaobo Hu, Tao Peng · Mar 9, 2026 · Citations: 0

Rubric Rating Automatic Metrics Law
  • To this end, we introduce \OneMillion-Bench \OneMillion-Bench, a benchmark of 400 expert-curated tasks spanning Law, Finance, Industry, Healthcare, and Natural Science, built to evaluate agents across economically consequential scenarios.
  • We adopt a rubric-based evaluation protocol scoring factual accuracy, logical coherence, practical feasibility, and professional compliance, focused on expert-level problems to ensure meaningful differentiation across agents.
MAWARITH: A Dataset and Benchmark for Legal Inheritance Reasoning with LLMs

Abdessalam Bouchekif, Shahd Gaben, Samer Rashwani, Somaya Eltanbouly, Mutaz Al-Khatib, Heba Sbahi · Mar 8, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics Law
  • To evaluate models beyond final-answer accuracy, we propose MIR-E (Mawarith Inheritance Reasoning Evaluation), a weighted multi-stage metric that scores key reasoning stages and captures error propagation across the pipeline.
  • The MAWARITH dataset is publicly available at https://github.com/bouchekif/inheritance_evaluation.
TableMind++: An Uncertainty-Aware Programmatic Agent for Tool-Augmented Table Reasoning

Mingyue Cheng, Shuo Yu, Chuang Jiang, Xiaoyu Tao, Qingyang Mao, Jie Ouyang · Mar 8, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics LawCoding
  • To address these limitations, we previously proposed TableMind as a tuning-based autonomous programmatic agent that simulates human-like interaction within a lightweight large language model (LLM).
  • While TableMind establishes a solid foundation for programmatic agents, the inherent stochasticity of LLMs remains a critical challenge that leads to hallucinations.
Proof-of-Guardrail in AI Agents and What (Not) to Trust from It

Xisen Jin, Michael Duan, Qin Lin, Aaron Chan, Zhenglun Chen, Junyi Du · Mar 6, 2026 · Citations: 0

Red Team Automatic Metrics MathLaw
  • As AI agents become widely deployed as online services, users often rely on an agent developer's claim about how safety is enforced, which introduces a threat where safety measures are falsely advertised.
  • To generate proof, the developer runs the agent and guardrail inside a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE), which produces a TEE-signed attestation of guardrail code execution verifiable by any user offline.
ExpGuard: LLM Content Moderation in Specialized Domains

Minseok Choi, Dongjin Kim, Seungbin Yang, Subin Kim, Youngjun Kwak, Juyoung Oh · Mar 3, 2026 · Citations: 0

Expert Verification LawMedicine
  • With the growing deployment of large language models (LLMs) in real-world applications, establishing robust safety guardrails to moderate their inputs and outputs has become essential to ensure adherence to safety policies.
  • Comprehensive evaluations conducted on ExpGuardTest and eight established public benchmarks reveal that ExpGuard delivers competitive performance across the board while demonstrating exceptional resilience to domain-specific adversarial…
The Trinity of Consistency as a Defining Principle for General World Models

Jingxuan Wei, Siyuan Li, Yuhang Xu, Zheng Sun, Junjie Jiang, Hexuan Jin · Feb 26, 2026 · Citations: 0

Simulation Env Law
  • To complement this conceptual framework, we introduce CoW-Bench, a benchmark centered on multi-frame reasoning and generation scenarios.
  • CoW-Bench evaluates both video generation models and UMMs under a unified evaluation protocol.
Whisper: Courtside Edition Enhancing ASR Performance Through LLM-Driven Context Generation

Yonathan Ron, Shiri Gilboa, Tammuz Dubnov · Feb 21, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics Law
  • We introduce Whisper: Courtside Edition, a novel multi-agent large language model (LLM) pipeline that enhances Whisper transcriptions without retraining.
  • The pipeline intercepts Whisper's initial transcript, applies specialized LLM agents for domain context identification, named entity recognition, and jargon detection, and generates compact prompts that guide Whisper's decoder.
Vichara: Appellate Judgment Prediction and Explanation for the Indian Judicial System

Pavithra PM Nair, Preethu Rose Anish · Feb 20, 2026 · Citations: 0

Human EvalAutomatic Metrics Law
  • Vichara surpasses existing judgment prediction benchmarks on both datasets, with GPT-4o mini achieving the highest performance (F1: 81.5 on PredEx, 80.3 on ILDC_expert), followed by Llama-3.1-8B.
  • Human evaluation of the generated explanations across Clarity, Linking, and Usefulness metrics highlights GPT-4o mini's superior interpretability.
Helpful to a Fault: Measuring Illicit Assistance in Multi-Turn, Multilingual LLM Agents

Nivya Talokar, Ayush K Tarun, Murari Mandal, Maksym Andriushchenko, Antoine Bosselut · Feb 18, 2026 · Citations: 0

Red Team LawMultilingual
  • LLM-based agents execute real-world workflows via tools and memory.
  • We introduce STING (Sequential Testing of Illicit N-step Goal execution), an automated red-teaming framework that constructs a step-by-step illicit plan grounded in a benign persona and iteratively probes a target agent with adaptive…
HLE-Verified: A Systematic Verification and Structured Revision of Humanity's Last Exam

Weiqi Zhai, Zhihai Wang, Jinghang Wang, Boyu Yang, Xiaogang Li, Xander Xu · Feb 15, 2026 · Citations: 0

Expert VerificationCritique Edit Automatic Metrics Law
  • Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) has become a widely used benchmark for evaluating frontier large language models on challenging, multi-domain questions.
  • However, community-led analyses have raised concerns that HLE contains a non-trivial number of noisy items, which can bias evaluation results and distort cross-model comparisons.
The Subjectivity of Respect in Police Traffic Stops: Modeling Community Perspectives in Body-Worn Camera Footage

Preni Golazizian, Elnaz Rahmati, Jackson Trager, Zhivar Sourati, Nona Ghazizadeh, Georgios Chochlakis · Feb 10, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise PreferenceRubric Rating Law
  • By sampling annotators from police-affiliated, justice-system-impacted, and non-affiliated Los Angeles residents, we enable the systematic study of perceptual differences across diverse communities.
  • To this end, we (i) develop a domain-specific evaluation rubric grounded in procedural justice theory, LAPD training materials, and extensive fieldwork; (ii) introduce a rubric-driven preference data construction framework for…
APEX-Agents

Bertie Vidgen, Austin Mann, Abby Fennelly, John Wright Stanly, Lucas Rothman, Marco Burstein · Jan 20, 2026 · Citations: 0

Rubric RatingExpert Verification Automatic Metrics Law
  • We introduce the AI Productivity Index for Agents (APEX-Agents), a benchmark for assessing whether AI agents can execute long-horizon, cross-application tasks created by investment banking analysts, management consultants, and corporate…
  • We test eight agents for the leaderboard using Pass@1.
Multimodal Multi-Agent Empowered Legal Judgment Prediction

Zhaolu Kang, Junhao Gong, Qingxi Chen, Hao Zhang, Jiaxin Liu, Rong Fu · Jan 19, 2026 · Citations: 0

Simulation Env Law
  • Furthermore, we build JurisMM, a large dataset with over 100,000 recent Chinese judicial records, including both text and multimodal video-text data, enabling comprehensive evaluation.
  • Experiments on JurisMM and the benchmark LawBench validate our framework's effectiveness.
CircuitLM: A Multi-Agent LLM-Aided Design Framework for Generating Circuit Schematics from Natural Language Prompts

Khandakar Shakib Al Hasan, Syed Rifat Raiyan, Hasin Mahtab Alvee, Wahid Sadik · Jan 8, 2026 · Citations: 0

Llm As Judge LawCoding
  • To address this, we present CircuitLM, a multi-agent pipeline that translates user prompts into structured, visually interpretable CircuitJSON schematics.
  • To systematically assess performance, we deploy a rigorous dual-layered evaluation methodology: a deterministic Electrical Rule Checking (ERC) engine categorizes topological faults by strict severity (Critical, Major, Minor, Warning), while…
Adaptation of Agentic AI: A Survey of Post-Training, Memory, and Skills

Pengcheng Jiang, Jiacheng Lin, Zhiyi Shi, Zifeng Wang, Luxi He, Yichen Wu · Dec 18, 2025 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference Automatic Metrics Law
  • Large language model (LLM) agents are moving beyond prompting alone.
  • ChatGPT marked the rise of general-purpose LLM assistants, DeepSeek showed that on-policy reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards can improve reasoning and tool use, and OpenClaw highlights a newer direction in which agents…
Point of Order: Action-Aware LLM Persona Modeling for Realistic Civic Simulation

Scott Merrill, Shashank Srivastava · Nov 21, 2025 · Citations: 0

Human EvalSimulation Env Law
  • Transcripts produced via automatic speech recognition (ASR) assign anonymous speaker labels (e.g., Speaker_1), preventing models from capturing consistent human behavior.
  • Turing-style human evaluations show our simulations are often indistinguishable from real deliberations, providing a practical and scalable method for complex realistic civic simulations.