Human Feedback Types
strongPairwise Preference
Directly usable for protocol triage.
"This technical report presents Sabiá-4 and Sabiazinho-4, a new generation of Portuguese language models with a focus on Brazilian Portuguese language."
HFEPX · Eval paper review
Thiago Laitz, Thales Sales Almeida, Hugo Abonizio, Roseval Malaquias Junior +5 more
Published
Mar 10, 2026
Citations
0
Trust level
Moderate
Usefulness score
65/100 (Medium)
Extraction confidence
70% (Moderate)
Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.
Rater population
Not reported
Signals refreshed
Mar 10, 2026
This paper has useful evaluation signal, but protocol completeness is partial; pair it with related papers before deciding implementation strategy.
Use this for comparison and orientation, not as your only source.
Best use
Secondary protocol comparison source
Use if you need
A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.
What to verify
Validate the evaluation procedure and quality controls in the full paper before operational use.
Main weakness
No major weakness surfaced.
Useful as a secondary reference; validate protocol details against neighboring papers.
If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here
This technical report presents Sabiá-4 and Sabiazinho-4, a new generation of Portuguese language models with a focus on Brazilian Portuguese language. The models were developed through a four-stage training pipeline: continued pre-training on Portuguese and Brazilian legal corpora, long-context extension to 128K tokens, supervised fine-tuning on instruction data spanning chat, code, legal tasks, and function calling, and preference alignment. We evaluate the models on six benchmark categories: conversational capabilities in Brazilian Portuguese, knowledge of Brazilian legislation, long-context understanding, instruction following, standardized exams, and agentic capabilities including tool use and web navigation. Results show that Sabiá-4 and Sabiazinho-4 achieve a favorable cost-performance trade-off compared to other models, positioning them in the upper-left region of the pricing-accuracy chart. The models show improvements over previous generations in legal document drafting, multi-turn dialogue quality, and agentic task completion.
These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.
Pairwise Preference
Directly usable for protocol triage.
"This technical report presents Sabiá-4 and Sabiazinho-4, a new generation of Portuguese language models with a focus on Brazilian Portuguese language."
Automatic Metrics
Includes extracted eval setup.
"This technical report presents Sabiá-4 and Sabiazinho-4, a new generation of Portuguese language models with a focus on Brazilian Portuguese language."
Not reported
No explicit QC controls found.
"This technical report presents Sabiá-4 and Sabiazinho-4, a new generation of Portuguese language models with a focus on Brazilian Portuguese language."
Not extracted
No benchmark anchors detected.
"This technical report presents Sabiá-4 and Sabiazinho-4, a new generation of Portuguese language models with a focus on Brazilian Portuguese language."
Accuracy
Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.
"Results show that Sabiá-4 and Sabiazinho-4 achieve a favorable cost-performance trade-off compared to other models, positioning them in the upper-left region of the pricing-accuracy chart."
No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.
This technical report presents Sabiá-4 and Sabiazinho-4, a new generation of Portuguese language models with a focus on Brazilian Portuguese language.
Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.
Human feedback protocol is explicit
Detected: Pairwise Preference
Evaluation mode is explicit
Detected: Automatic Metrics
Quality control reporting appears
No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.
Benchmark or dataset anchors are present
No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.
Metric reporting is present
Detected: accuracy