Skip to content
← Back to explorer

Grounding Arabic LLMs in the Doha Historical Dictionary: Retrieval-Augmented Understanding of Quran and Hadith

Somaya Eltanbouly, Samer Rashwani · Mar 25, 2026 · Citations: 0

How to use this page

Moderate trust

Use this for comparison and orientation, not as your only source.

Best use

Secondary protocol comparison source

What to verify

Validate the exact study setup in the full paper before operational use.

Evidence quality

Moderate

Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in many language tasks, yet they continue to struggle with complex historical and religious Arabic texts such as the Quran and Hadith. To address this limitation, we develop a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) framework grounded in diachronic lexicographic knowledge. Unlike prior RAG systems that rely on general-purpose corpora, our approach retrieves evidence from the Doha Historical Dictionary of Arabic (DHDA), a large-scale resource documenting the historical development of Arabic vocabulary. The proposed pipeline combines hybrid retrieval with an intent-based routing mechanism to provide LLMs with precise, contextually relevant historical information. Our experiments show that this approach improves the accuracy of Arabic-native LLMs, including Fanar and ALLaM, to over 85\%, substantially reducing the performance gap with Gemini, a proprietary large-scale model. Gemini also serves as an LLM-as-a-judge system for automatic evaluation in our experiments. The automated judgments were verified through human evaluation, demonstrating high agreement (kappa = 0.87). An error analysis further highlights key linguistic challenges, including diacritics and compound expressions. These findings demonstrate the value of integrating diachronic lexicographic resources into retrieval-augmented generation frameworks to enhance Arabic language understanding, particularly for historical and religious texts. The code and resources are publicly available at: https://github.com/somayaeltanbouly/Doha-Dictionary-RAG.

Should You Rely On This Paper?

This paper has useful evaluation signal, but protocol completeness is partial; pair it with related papers before deciding implementation strategy.

Best use

Secondary protocol comparison source

Use if you need

A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.

Main weakness

No major weakness surfaced.

Trust level

Moderate

Usefulness score

59/100 • Medium

Useful as a secondary reference; validate protocol details against neighboring papers.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Detected

Usefulness for eval research

Moderate-confidence candidate

Extraction confidence 55%

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

missing

None explicit

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

"Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in many language tasks, yet they continue to struggle with complex historical and religious Arabic texts such as the Quran and Hadith."

Evaluation Modes

strong

Human Eval, Llm As Judge, Automatic Metrics

Includes extracted eval setup.

"Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in many language tasks, yet they continue to struggle with complex historical and religious Arabic texts such as the Quran and Hadith."

Quality Controls

strong

Inter Annotator Agreement Reported

Calibration/adjudication style controls detected.

"Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in many language tasks, yet they continue to struggle with complex historical and religious Arabic texts such as the Quran and Hadith."

Benchmarks / Datasets

missing

Not extracted

No benchmark anchors detected.

"Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in many language tasks, yet they continue to struggle with complex historical and religious Arabic texts such as the Quran and Hadith."

Reported Metrics

strong

Accuracy, Kappa, Agreement

Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.

"Our experiments show that this approach improves the accuracy of Arabic-native LLMs, including Fanar and ALLaM, to over 85\%, substantially reducing the performance gap with Gemini, a proprietary large-scale model."

Human Feedback Details

  • Uses human feedback: No
  • Feedback types: None
  • Rater population: Not reported
  • Expertise required: Coding

Evaluation Details

  • Evaluation modes: Human Eval, Llm As Judge, Automatic Metrics
  • Agentic eval: None
  • Quality controls: Inter Annotator Agreement Reported
  • Evidence quality: Moderate
  • Use this page as: Secondary protocol comparison source

Protocol And Measurement Signals

Benchmarks / Datasets

No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.

Reported Metrics

accuracykappaagreement

Research Brief

Metadata summary

Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in many language tasks, yet they continue to struggle with complex historical and religious Arabic texts such as the Quran and Hadith.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in many language tasks, yet they continue to struggle with complex historical and religious Arabic texts such as the Quran and Hadith.
  • To address this limitation, we develop a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) framework grounded in diachronic lexicographic knowledge.
  • Unlike prior RAG systems that rely on general-purpose corpora, our approach retrieves evidence from the Doha Historical Dictionary of Arabic (DHDA), a large-scale resource documenting the historical development of Arabic vocabulary.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Validate inferred eval signals (Human evaluation, Automatic metrics) against the full paper.
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended Queries

Research Summary

Contribution Summary

  • To address this limitation, we develop a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) framework grounded in diachronic lexicographic knowledge.
  • Gemini also serves as an LLM-as-a-judge system for automatic evaluation in our experiments.
  • The automated judgments were verified through human evaluation, demonstrating high agreement (kappa = 0.87).

Why It Matters For Eval

  • Gemini also serves as an LLM-as-a-judge system for automatic evaluation in our experiments.
  • The automated judgments were verified through human evaluation, demonstrating high agreement (kappa = 0.87).

Researcher Checklist

  • Gap: Human feedback protocol is explicit

    No explicit human feedback protocol detected.

  • Pass: Evaluation mode is explicit

    Detected: Human Eval, Llm As Judge, Automatic Metrics

  • Pass: Quality control reporting appears

    Detected: Inter Annotator Agreement Reported

  • Gap: Benchmark or dataset anchors are present

    No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.

  • Pass: Metric reporting is present

    Detected: accuracy, kappa, agreement

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

Get Started

Join the #1 Platform for AI Training Talent

Where top AI builders and expert AI Trainers connect to build the future of AI.
Self-Service
Post a Job
Post your project and get a shortlist of qualified AI Trainers and Data Labelers. Hire and manage your team in the tools you already use.
Managed Service
For Large Projects
Done-for-You
We recruit, onboard, and manage a dedicated team inside your tools. End-to-end operations for large or complex projects.
For Freelancers
Join as an AI Trainer
Find AI training and data labeling projects across platforms, all in one place. One profile, one application process, more opportunities.