Somaya Eltanbouly, Samer Rashwani
Core AI workload signals detected from paper context and implementation/artifact evidence.
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in many language tasks, yet they continue to struggle with complex historical and religious Arabic texts such as the Quran and Hadith. To address this limitation, we develop a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) framework grounded in diachronic lexicographic knowledge. Unlike prior RAG systems that rely on general-purpose corpora, our approach retrieves ...
evidence from the Doha Historical Dictionary of Arabic (DHDA), a large-scale resource documenting the historical development of Arabic vocabulary. The proposed pipeline combines hybrid retrieval with an intent-based routing mechanism to provide LLMs with precise, contextually relevant historical information. Our experiments show that this approach improves the accuracy of Arabic-native LLMs, including Fanar and ALLaM, to over 85\%, substantially reducing the performance gap with Gemini, a proprietary large-scale model. Gemini also serves as an LLM-as-a-judge system for automatic evaluation in our experiments. The automated judgments were verified through human evaluation, demonstrating high agreement (kappa = 0.87). An error analysis further highlights key linguistic challenges, including diacritics and compound expressions. These findings demonstrate the value of integrating diachronic lexicographic resources into retrieval-augmented generation frameworks to enhance Arabic language understanding, particularly for historical and religious texts. The code and resources are publicly available at: https://github.com/somayaeltanbouly/Doha-Dictionary-RAG.
No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in many language tasks, yet they continue to struggle with complex historical and religious Arabic texts such as the Quran and Hadith.
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
Hardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 60/100, grounding 58/100, status medium.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Matched via arXiv identifier search
Risk flags
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
Hardware requirements
No verified implementation available
No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Tasks
Retrieval / indexing
Methods
Transformer, Retrieval-augmented generation
Domains
Natural Language Processing, Large Language Models, Information Retrieval
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.