Human Feedback Types
missingNone explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"The capabilities of an agent swarm depend on both its individual members and how they coordinate."
HFEPX · Eval paper review
Guowei Xu, Zhenting Qi, Amani Kiruga, Himabindu Lakkaraju +1 more
Published
Oct 15, 2026
Citations
0
Trust level
Low
Usefulness score
0/100 (Low)
Extraction confidence
15% (Low)
Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.
Rater population
Not reported
Signals refreshed
Oct 15, 2026
This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.
Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.
All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.
Best use
Background context only
Use if you need
A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.
What to verify
Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.
Main weakness
This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.
Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.
If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here
The capabilities of an agent swarm depend on both its individual members and how they coordinate. Yet existing multi-agent systems often train agents within fixed orchestration structures, separating the learning of individual capabilities from the organization of collective behavior. We introduce market-based post-training (MPT), a framework for jointly learning action policies and self-orchestration in decentralized agent swarms. Agents express their willingness to participate through bids, which determine who acts and how collective outcomes provide local training credit. Learning both action and bidding behavior allows individual capabilities and patterns of participation to adapt together without a central coordinating agent. We evaluate MPT on embodied crafting, robot navigation, and deep research. Results show gains over monolithic post-training and confirm that agent participation indeed evolves with learning. With the same post-trained action policies, learned self-orchestration outperforms alternative coordination strategies. Ablations show that both action and bidding benefit from learning, and that learned bids provide more effective action-training signals. Beyond the original training objectives, trained swarms adapt faster to related tasks and achieve better performance with larger populations at inference time. Larger populations also suffer smaller performance losses under agent dropout, demonstrating that learned self-orchestration supports reuse, scaling, and robustness in decentralized agent swarms. Code and trained models are available at https://github.com/Embodied-Minds-Lab/MPT.
These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.
None explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"The capabilities of an agent swarm depend on both its individual members and how they coordinate."
None explicit
Validate eval design from full paper text.
"The capabilities of an agent swarm depend on both its individual members and how they coordinate."
Not reported
No explicit QC controls found.
"The capabilities of an agent swarm depend on both its individual members and how they coordinate."
Not extracted
No benchmark anchors detected.
"The capabilities of an agent swarm depend on both its individual members and how they coordinate."
Not extracted
No metric anchors detected.
"The capabilities of an agent swarm depend on both its individual members and how they coordinate."
No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.
No metric terms were extracted from the available abstract.
The capabilities of an agent swarm depend on both its individual members and how they coordinate.
Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.
Human feedback protocol is explicit
No explicit human feedback protocol detected.
Evaluation mode is explicit
No clear evaluation mode extracted.
Quality control reporting appears
No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.
Benchmark or dataset anchors are present
No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.
Metric reporting is present
No metric terms extracted.