- CounselReflect: A Toolkit for Auditing Mental-Health Dialogues
Yahan Li, Chaohao Du, Zeyang Li, Christopher Chun Kuizon, Shupeng Cheng · Mar 31, 2026 · Citations: 0
Rubric RatingExpert Verification Human Eval Web Browsing
The system integrates two families of evaluation signals: (i) 12 model-based metrics produced by task-specific predictors, and (ii) rubric-based metrics that extend coverage via a literature-derived library (69 metrics) and user-defined…
- Is this Idea Novel? An Automated Benchmark for Judgment of Research Ideas
Tim Schopf, Michael Färber · Mar 11, 2026 · Citations: 0
Rubric Rating Human Eval
To address this, we introduce RINoBench, the first comprehensive benchmark for large-scale evaluation of research idea novelty judgments.
- PanCanBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Pancreatic Oncology
Yimin Zhao, Sheela R. Damle, Simone E. Dekker, Scott Geng, Karly Williams Silva · Mar 2, 2026 · Citations: 0
Rubric RatingExpert Verification Llm As JudgeAutomatic Metrics
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved expert-level performance on standardized examinations, yet multiple-choice accuracy poorly reflects real-world clinical utility and safety.
- PoSh: Using Scene Graphs To Guide LLMs-as-a-Judge For Detailed Image Descriptions
Amith Ananthram, Elias Stengel-Eskin, Lorena A. Bradford, Julia Demarest, Adam Purvis · Oct 21, 2025 · Citations: 0
Rubric Rating Human EvalLlm As Judge
In this work, we introduce PoSh, a metric for detailed image description that uses scene graphs as structured rubrics to guide LLMs-as-a-Judge, producing aggregate scores grounded in fine-grained errors (e.g.
- \$OneMillion-Bench: How Far are Language Agents from Human Experts?
Qianyu Yang, Yang Liu, Jiaqi Li, Jun Bai, Hao Chen · Mar 9, 2026 · Citations: 0
Rubric Rating Automatic Metrics Tool Use
To this end, we introduce \OneMillion-Bench \OneMillion-Bench, a benchmark of 400 expert-curated tasks spanning Law, Finance, Industry, Healthcare, and Natural Science, built to evaluate agents across economically consequential scenarios.
- LLM Essay Scoring Under Holistic and Analytic Rubrics: Prompt Effects and Bias
Filip J. Kucia, Anirban Chakraborty, Anna Wróblewska · Mar 31, 2026 · Citations: 0
Rubric Rating Human Eval
We present a systematic evaluation of instruction-tuned LLMs across three open essay-scoring datasets (ASAP 2.0, ELLIPSE, and DREsS) that cover both holistic and analytic scoring.
- HLE-Verified: A Systematic Verification and Structured Revision of Humanity's Last Exam
Weiqi Zhai, Zhihai Wang, Jinghang Wang, Boyu Yang, Xiaogang Li · Feb 15, 2026 · Citations: 0
Expert VerificationCritique Edit Automatic Metrics
Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) has become a widely used benchmark for evaluating frontier large language models on challenging, multi-domain questions.
- Personalized RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models with Human Aligned Personalization
Qiyao Ma, Dechen Gao, Rui Cai, Boqi Zhao, Hanchu Zhou · Apr 8, 2026 · Citations: 0
Pairwise PreferenceRubric Rating Human EvalAutomatic Metrics
Pluralistic alignment has emerged as a critical frontier in the development of Large Language Models (LLMs), with reward models (RMs) serving as a central mechanism for capturing diverse human values.
- Don't Pass@k: A Bayesian Framework for Large Language Model Evaluation
Mohsen Hariri, Amirhossein Samandar, Michael Hinczewski, Vipin Chaudhary · Oct 5, 2025 · Citations: 0
Rubric Rating Automatic MetricsSimulation Env
We present a principled Bayesian evaluation framework that replaces Pass@k and average accuracy over N trials (avg@N) with posterior estimates of a model's underlying success probability and credible intervals, yielding stable rankings and…
- StitchCUDA: An Automated Multi-Agents End-to-End GPU Programing Framework with Rubric-based Agentic Reinforcement Learning
Shiyang Li, Zijian Zhang, Winson Chen, Yuebo Luo, Mingyi Hong · Mar 3, 2026 · Citations: 0
Rubric Rating Automatic Metrics Multi Agent
To address the challenge, in this work, we propose StitchCUDA, a multi-agent framework for end-to-end GPU program generation, with three specialized agents: a Planner to orchestrate whole system design, a Coder dedicated to implementing it…
- More Human, More Efficient: Aligning Annotations with Quantized SLMs
Jiayu Wang, Junyoung Lee · Apr 1, 2026 · Citations: 0
Rubric Rating Automatic Metrics
As Large Language Model (LLM) capabilities advance, the demand for high-quality annotation of exponentially increasing text corpora has outpaced human capacity, leading to the widespread adoption of LLMs in automatic evaluation and…
- Beyond the Resumé: A Rubric-Aware Automatic Interview System for Information Elicitation
Harry Stuart, Masahiro Kaneko, Timothy Baldwin · Mar 2, 2026 · Citations: 0
Rubric Rating Automatic Metrics
Effective hiring is integral to the success of an organisation, but it is very challenging to find the most suitable candidates because expert evaluation (e.g.\ interviews conducted by a technical manager) are expensive to deploy at scale.
- From Intuition to Calibrated Judgment: A Rubric-Based Expert-Panel Study of Human Detection of LLM-Generated Korean Text
Shinwoo Park, Yo-Sub Han · Jan 6, 2026 · Citations: 0
Rubric Rating Automatic Metrics
Distinguishing human-written Korean text from fluent LLM outputs remains difficult even for trained readers, who can over-trust surface well-formedness.
- A Scalable Framework for Evaluating Health Language Models
Neil Mallinar, A. Ali Heydari, Xin Liu, Anthony Z. Faranesh, Brent Winslow · Mar 30, 2025 · Citations: 0
Rubric RatingExpert Verification Automatic Metrics
As LLM-driven health applications are increasingly adopted, rigorous and efficient one-sided evaluation methodologies are crucial to ensure response quality across multiple dimensions, including accuracy, personalization and safety.
- PRBench: End-to-end Paper Reproduction in Physics Research
Shi Qiu, Junyi Deng, Yiwei Deng, Haoran Dong, Jieyu Fu · Mar 29, 2026 · Citations: 0
Rubric RatingExpert Verification Automatic MetricsSimulation Env
We introduce PRBench, a benchmark of 30 expert-curated tasks spanning 11 subfields of physics.
- Beyond the Illusion of Consensus: From Surface Heuristics to Knowledge-Grounded Evaluation in LLM-as-a-Judge
Mingyang Song, Mao Zheng, Chenning Xu · Mar 11, 2026 · Citations: 0
Rubric RatingCritique Edit Llm As Judge
Through a large-scale study of 105,600 evaluation instances (32 LLMs \times 3 frontier judges \times 100 tasks \times 11 temperatures), we show that model-level agreement (Spearman ρ= 0.99) masks fragile sample-level agreement (Pearson r =…
- Evaluating Austrian A-Level German Essays with Large Language Models for Automated Essay Scoring
Jonas Kubesch, Lena Huber, Clemens Havas · Mar 6, 2026 · Citations: 0
Rubric Rating Human Eval
This paper investigates the application of state-of-the-art open-weight LLMs for the grading of Austrian A-level German texts, with a particular focus on rubric-based evaluation.
- Augmenting Rating-Scale Measures with Text-Derived Items Using the Information-Determined Scoring (IDS) Framework
Joe Watson, Ivan O'Connor, Chia-Wen Chen, Luning Sun, Fang Luo · Oct 9, 2025 · Citations: 0
Rubric Rating Automatic MetricsSimulation Env
This marks a conceptual departure from traditional automated text scoring by prioritising information gain over fidelity to expert rubrics or human-annotated data.
- When Users Change Their Mind: Evaluating Interruptible Agents in Long-Horizon Web Navigation
Henry Peng Zou, Chunyu Miao, Wei-Chieh Huang, Yankai Chen, Yue Zhou · Apr 1, 2026 · Citations: 0
Critique Edit Simulation Env Long Horizon
As LLM agents transition from short, static problem solving to executing complex, long-horizon tasks in dynamic environments, the ability to handle user interruptions, such as adding requirement or revising goals, during mid-task execution…
- APEX-Agents
Bertie Vidgen, Austin Mann, Abby Fennelly, John Wright Stanly, Lucas Rothman · Jan 20, 2026 · Citations: 0
Rubric RatingExpert Verification Automatic Metrics Long Horizon
We introduce the AI Productivity Index for Agents (APEX-Agents), a benchmark for assessing whether AI agents can execute long-horizon, cross-application tasks created by investment banking analysts, management consultants, and corporate…
- Beyond Paper-to-Paper: Structured Profiling and Rubric Scoring for Paper-Reviewer Matching
Yicheng Pan, Zhiyuan Ning, Ludi Wang, Yi Du · Apr 7, 2026 · Citations: 0
Rubric Rating Automatic Metrics
To address this gap, we propose P2R, a training-free framework that shifts from implicit paper-to-paper matching to explicit profile-based matching.
- Xpertbench: Expert Level Tasks with Rubrics-Based Evaluation
Xue Liu, Xin Ma, Yuxin Ma, Yongchang Peng, Duo Wang · Mar 27, 2026 · Citations: 0
Rubric RatingExpert Verification Automatic Metrics
To bridge this gap, we present XpertBench, a high-fidelity benchmark engineered to assess LLMs across authentic professional domains.
- When AI Meets Early Childhood Education: Large Language Models as Assessment Teammates in Chinese Preschools
Xingming Li, Runke Huang, Yanan Bao, Yuye Jin, Yuru Jiao · Mar 25, 2026 · Citations: 0
Rubric Rating Automatic Metrics
In this paper, we investigate whether AI can serve as a scalable assessment teammate by extracting structured quality indicators and validating their alignment with human expert judgments.
- QuarkMedBench: A Real-World Scenario Driven Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models
Yao Wu, Kangping Yin, Liang Dong, Zhenxin Ma, Shuting Xu · Mar 14, 2026 · Citations: 0
Rubric Rating Automatic Metrics
To bridge this gap, we introduce QuarkMedBench, an ecologically valid benchmark tailored for real-world medical LLM assessment.
- Document Reconstruction Unlocks Scalable Long-Context RLVR
Yao Xiao, Lei Wang, Yue Deng, Guanzheng Chen, Ziqi Jin · Feb 9, 2026 · Citations: 0
Rubric Rating Automatic Metrics
However, it often relies on gold-standard answers or explicit evaluation rubrics provided by powerful teacher models or human experts, which are costly and time-consuming.
- I Can't Believe It's Corrupt: Evaluating Corruption in Multi-Agent Governance Systems
Vedanta S P, Ponnurangam Kumaraguru · Mar 19, 2026 · Citations: 0
Rubric Rating Simulation Env Multi Agent
Large language models are increasingly proposed as autonomous agents for high-stakes public workflows, yet we lack systematic evidence about whether they would follow institutional rules when granted authority.
- Build, Judge, Optimize: A Blueprint for Continuous Improvement of Multi-Agent Consumer Assistants
Alejandro Breen Herrera, Aayush Sheth, Steven G. Xu, Zhucheng Zhan, Charles Wright · Mar 3, 2026 · Citations: 0
Pairwise PreferenceRubric Rating Llm As JudgeSimulation Env Long Horizon
Conversational shopping assistants (CSAs) represent a compelling application of agentic AI, but moving from prototype to production reveals two underexplored challenges: how to evaluate multi-turn interactions and how to optimize tightly…
- Mock Worlds, Real Skills: Building Small Agentic Language Models with Synthetic Tasks, Simulated Environments, and Rubric-Based Rewards
Yuanjie Lyu, Chengyu Wang, Lei Shen, Jun Huang, Tong Xu · Jan 30, 2026 · Citations: 0
Rubric Rating Simulation Env Tool Use
Small LLMs often struggle to match the agentic capabilities of large, costly models.
- Self-Preference Bias in Rubric-Based Evaluation of Large Language Models
José Pombal, Ricardo Rei, André F. T. Martins · Apr 8, 2026 · Citations: 0
Pairwise PreferenceRubric Rating Llm As Judge
We present the first study of SPB in rubric-based evaluation, an increasingly popular benchmarking paradigm where judges issue binary verdicts on individual evaluation criteria, instead of assigning holistic scores or rankings.
- Does LLM Alignment Really Need Diversity? An Empirical Study of Adapting RLVR Methods for Moral Reasoning
Zhaowei Zhang, Xiaohan Liu, Xuekai Zhu, Junchao Huang, Ceyao Zhang · Mar 11, 2026 · Citations: 0
Rubric Rating Llm As Judge
To enable stable RLVR training, we build a rubric-grounded reward pipeline by training a Qwen3-1.7B judge model.
- IntelliAsk: Learning to Ask High-Quality Research Questions via RLVR
Karun Sharma, Vidushee Vats, Shengzhi Li, Yuxiang Wang, Zhongtian Sun · Jan 23, 2026 · Citations: 0
Pairwise PreferenceExpert Verification Human Eval
Peer review relies on substantive, evidence-based questions, yet current LLMs generate surface-level queries that perform worse than human reviewer questions in expert evaluation.
- Personalized Prediction of Perceived Message Effectiveness Using Large Language Model Based Digital Twins
Jasmin Han, Janardan Devkota, Joseph Waring, Amanda Luken, Felix Naughton · Feb 23, 2026 · Citations: 0
Rubric Rating Automatic Metrics
Model performance was assessed on three held-out messages per participant using accuracy, Cohen's kappa, and F1.
- MENLO: From Preferences to Proficiency -- Evaluating and Modeling Native-like Quality Across 47 Languages
Chenxi Whitehouse, Sebastian Ruder, Tony Lin, Oksana Kurylo, Haruka Takagi · Sep 30, 2025 · Citations: 0
Pairwise PreferenceRubric Rating Automatic Metrics
To address this, we introduce MENLO, a framework that operationalizes the evaluation of native-like response quality based on audience design-inspired mechanisms.
- HEART: A Unified Benchmark for Assessing Humans and LLMs in Emotional Support Dialogue
Laya Iyer, Kriti Aggarwal, Sanmi Koyejo, Gail Heyman, Desmond C. Ong · Jan 9, 2026 · Citations: 0
Pairwise PreferenceRubric Rating Human EvalLlm As Judge
Despite rapid progress in language models, we still lack a clear way to understand how their abilities in these interpersonal domains compare to those of humans.
- Automated Coding of Communication Data Using ChatGPT: Consistency Across Subgroups
Jiangang Hao, Wenju Cui, Patrick Kyllonen, Emily Kerzabi · Oct 23, 2025 · Citations: 0
Rubric Rating Human EvalAutomatic Metrics
Prior research has established that ChatGPT can be directly instructed with coding rubrics to code the communication data and achieves accuracy comparable to human raters.
- MIND: Unified Inquiry and Diagnosis RL with Criteria Grounded Clinical Supports for Psychiatric Consultation
Guoyi Li, Shihao Xu, Jiatong Ma, Yunyun Han, Jianhua Chen · Mar 4, 2026 · Citations: 0
Rubric Rating Automatic Metrics Long Horizon
Large language models (LLMs) have advanced medical dialogue systems, yet psychiatric consultation poses substantially higher demands due to subjective ambiguity and comorbidity complexity: an agent must continuously extract…
- Role-Augmented Intent-Driven Generative Search Engine Optimization
Xiaolu Chen, Haojie Wu, Jie Bao, Zhen Chen, Yong Liao · Aug 15, 2025 · Citations: 0
Rubric Rating Automatic Metrics Web Browsing
To better evaluate the method under realistic settings, we address the benchmarking limitations of prior work by: (1) extending the GEO dataset with diversified query variations reflecting real-world search scenarios and (2) introducing…
- Paper Reconstruction Evaluation: Evaluating Presentation and Hallucination in AI-written Papers
Atsuyuki Miyai, Mashiro Toyooka, Zaiying Zhao, Kenta Watanabe, Toshihiko Yamasaki · Apr 1, 2026 · Citations: 0
Rubric Rating Automatic Metrics
We introduce Paper Reconstruction Evaluation (PaperRecon), an evaluation framework in which an overview (overview.md) is created from an existing paper, after which an agent generates a full paper based on the overview and minimal…
- Rethinking Atomic Decomposition for LLM Judges: A Prompt-Controlled Study of Reference-Grounded QA Evaluation
Xinran Zhang · Mar 30, 2026 · Citations: 0
Rubric Rating Automatic Metrics
Atomic decomposition -- breaking a candidate answer into claims before verifying each against a reference -- is a widely adopted design for LLM-based reference-grounded judges.
- Stabilizing Rubric Integration Training via Decoupled Advantage Normalization
Zelin Tan, Zhouliang Yu, Bohan Lin, Zijie Geng, Hejia Geng · Mar 27, 2026 · Citations: 0
Rubric Rating Automatic Metrics
We propose Process-Aware Policy Optimization (PAPO), a method that integrates process-level evaluation into Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) through decoupled advantage normalization, to address two limitations of existing reward…
- Decomposing Physician Disagreement in HealthBench
Satya Borgohain, Roy Mariathas · Feb 26, 2026 · Citations: 0
Rubric Rating
We decompose physician disagreement in the HealthBench medical AI evaluation dataset to understand where variance resides and what observable features can explain it.
- ThReadMed-QA: A Multi-Turn Medical Dialogue Benchmark from Real Patient Questions
Monica Munnangi, Saiph Savage · Mar 11, 2026 · Citations: 0
Rubric Rating Llm As Judge
We introduce ThReadMed-QA, a benchmark of 2,437 fully-answered patient-physician conversation threads extracted from r/AskDocs, comprising 8,204 question-answer pairs across up to 9 turns.
- ClinConsensus: A Consensus-Based Benchmark for Evaluating Chinese Medical LLMs across Difficulty Levels
Xiang Zheng, Han Li, Wenjie Luo, Weiqi Zhai, Yiyuan Li · Mar 2, 2026 · Citations: 0
Rubric Rating Llm As Judge
However, existing medical benchmarks remain largely static and task-isolated, failing to capture the openness, longitudinal structure, and safety-critical complexity of real-world clinical workflows.
- RASPRef: Retrieval-Augmented Self-Supervised Prompt Refinement for Large Reasoning Models
Rahul Soni · Mar 27, 2026 · Citations: 0
Critique Edit Long Horizon
Recent reasoning-focused language models such as DeepSeek R1 and OpenAI o1 have demonstrated strong performance on structured reasoning benchmarks including GSM8K, MATH, and multi-hop question answering tasks.
- KLong: Training LLM Agent for Extremely Long-horizon Tasks
Yue Liu, Yingwei Ma, Yibo Miao, Yanhao Li, Yuchong Xie · Feb 19, 2026 · Citations: 0
Rubric Rating Long Horizon
Then, we introduce Research-Factory, an automated pipeline that generates high-quality training data by collecting research papers and constructing evaluation rubrics.
- RebuttalAgent: Strategic Persuasion in Academic Rebuttal via Theory of Mind
Zhitao He, Zongwei Lyu, Yi R Fung · Jan 22, 2026 · Citations: 0
Pairwise PreferenceCritique Edit Human Eval
In this paper, we introduce RebuttalAgent, the first framework to ground academic rebuttal in Theory of Mind (ToM), operationalized through a ToM-Strategy-Response (TSR) framework that models reviewer mental state, formulates persuasion…
- ReasonScaffold: A Scaffolded Reasoning-based Annotation Protocol for Human-AI Co-Annotation
Smitha Muthya Sudheendra, Jaideep Srivastava · Mar 22, 2026 · Citations: 0
Critique Edit Automatic Metrics
We evaluate the approach on sentiment classification and opinion detection tasks, analyzing changes in inter-annotator agreement and revision behavior.
- OMIND: Framework for Knowledge Grounded Finetuning and Multi-Turn Dialogue Benchmark for Mental Health LLMs
Suraj Racha, Prashant Harish Joshi, Utkarsh Maurya, Nitin Yadav, Mridul Sharma · Mar 26, 2026 · Citations: 0
Rubric Rating Automatic Metrics
We highlight three primary challenges for LLMs in mental health - lack of high quality interpretable and knowledge grounded training data; training paradigms restricted to core capabilities, and evaluation of multi turn dialogue settings.
- CHiL(L)Grader: Calibrated Human-in-the-Loop Short-Answer Grading
Pranav Raikote, Korbinian Randl, Ioanna Miliou, Athanasios Lakes, Panagiotis Papapetrou · Mar 12, 2026 · Citations: 0
Rubric Rating Automatic Metrics
We introduce CHiL(L)Grader, the first automated grading framework that incorporates calibrated confidence estimation into a human-in-the-loop workflow.
- Confusion-Aware Rubric Optimization for LLM-based Automated Grading
Yucheng Chu, Hang Li, Kaiqi Yang, Yasemin Copur-Gencturk, Joseph Krajcik · Feb 28, 2026 · Citations: 0
Rubric Rating Automatic Metrics
Empirical evaluations on teacher education and STEM datasets demonstrate that CARO significantly outperforms existing SOTA methods.
- From Pixels to Policies: Reinforcing Spatial Reasoning in Language Models for Content-Aware Layout Design
Sha Li, Stefano Petrangeli, Yu Shen, Xiang Chen · Feb 14, 2026 · Citations: 0
Critique Edit Simulation Env
We introduce LaySPA, a reinforcement learning framework that equips large language models (LLMs) with explicit and interpretable spatial reasoning for content-aware graphic layout design.
- From Evidence-Based Medicine to Knowledge Graph: Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Sports Rehabilitation and a Domain Benchmark
Jinning Zhang, Jie Song, Wenhui Tu, Zecheng Li, Jingxuan Li · Jan 1, 2026 · Citations: 0
Rubric RatingExpert Verification Automatic Metrics
Validated in sports rehabilitation, we release a knowledge graph (357,844 nodes, 371,226 edges) and a benchmark of 1,637 QA pairs.
- PrefDisco: Benchmarking Proactive Personalized Reasoning
Shuyue Stella Li, Avinandan Bose, Faeze Brahman, Simon Shaolei Du, Pang Wei Koh · Sep 30, 2025 · Citations: 0
Pairwise PreferenceRubric Rating Automatic Metrics
We introduce PrefDisco, an evaluation methodology that transforms static benchmarks into interactive personalization tasks using psychologically-grounded personas with sparse, context-dependent preferences, and define PrefAlign as a…
- Multimodal Peer Review Simulation with Actionable To-Do Recommendations for Community-Aware Manuscript Revisions
Mengze Hong, Di Jiang, Weiwei Zhao, Yawen Li, Yihang Wang · Nov 14, 2025 · Citations: 0
Critique Edit Simulation Env
Experimental results highlight the effectiveness of the proposed system in generating more comprehensive and useful reviews aligned with expert standards, surpassing ablated baselines and advancing transparent, human-centered scholarly…
- Cross-Cultural Expert-Level Art Critique Evaluation with Vision-Language Models
Haorui Yu, Xuehang Wen, Fengrui Zhang, Qiufeng Yi · Jan 12, 2026 · Citations: 0
Rubric RatingCritique Edit
Existing benchmarks assess perception without interpretation, and common evaluation proxies, such as automated metrics and LLM-judge averaging, are unreliable for culturally sensitive generative tasks.
- PAVE: Premise-Aware Validation and Editing for Retrieval-Augmented LLMs
Tianyi Huang, Caden Yang, Emily Yin, Eric Wang, Michael Zhang · Mar 21, 2026 · Citations: 0
Critique Edit Automatic Metrics
In controlled ablations with a fixed retriever and backbone, PAVE outperforms simpler post-retrieval baselines in two evidence-grounded QA settings, with the largest gain reaching 32.7 accuracy points on a span-grounded benchmark.
- Can Large Language Models Replace Human Coders? Introducing ContentBench
Michael Haman · Feb 23, 2026 · Citations: 0
Critique Edit Automatic Metrics
This paper introduces ContentBench, a public benchmark suite that helps answer this replacement question by tracking how much agreement low-cost LLMs achieve and what they cost on the same interpretive coding tasks.
- PaperBanana: Automating Academic Illustration for AI Scientists
Dawei Zhu, Rui Meng, Yale Song, Xiyu Wei, Sujian Li · Jan 30, 2026 · Citations: 0
Critique Edit Automatic Metrics
To lift this burden, we introduce PaperBanana, an agentic framework for automated generation of publication-ready academic illustrations.
- FOR-Prompting: From Objection to Revision via an Asymmetric Prompting Protocol
He Zhang, Anzhou Zhang, Jian Dai · Oct 2, 2025 · Citations: 0
Pairwise PreferenceCritique Edit Automatic Metrics
Beyond structured math tasks, FOR-Prompting supports refinement in open-ended and multi-stage tasks: qualitative analysis shows improved exploration, coverage, and specificity, and a blind study of human preferences found that participants…
- MARS: toward more efficient multi-agent collaboration for LLM reasoning
Xiao Wang, Jia Wang, Yijie Wang, Pengtao Dang, Sha Cao · Sep 24, 2025 · Citations: 0
Critique Edit Automatic Metrics Multi Agent
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved impressive results in natural language understanding, yet their reasoning capabilities remain limited when operating as single agents.