CoLFA: Collaboration-Guided Lightweight Failure Attribution for LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems
Abstract
Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
Failure attribution in multi-agent systems requires tracing error formation to identify the decisive error step and the responsible agent. However, agents' division of work and information exchange lead to Interleaved Steps and Cluttered Content, requiring models to link executions and check details in lengthy records. This makes it difficult to balance localization accuracy and token cost. We find that multi-agent collaboration also leaves records of how executions connect and content passes between them as results are formed, providing evidence for tracing error formation. Based on this observation, we propose CoLFA (Collaboration-Guided Lightweight Failure Attribution), which uses collaboration cues to organize the attribution input according to how results are formed, determining which steps are examined and how their content is presented. Through Handoff-Guided Step Expansion and Cross-Referenced Content Organization, CoLFA helps the model focus on examining error formation and the role of each decision while reducing the processing of irrelevant and repeated records. Across five settings spanning Who&When and LongRCA and three backbone models, CoLFA achieves the highest exact step-localization accuracy with the lowest token consumption. Compared with individual baselines in each setting, CoLFA improves accuracy by up to 37.50% and reduces token consumption by up to 97.6%.
Results and benchmarks
Failure attribution in multi-agent systems requires tracing error formation to identify the decisive error step and the responsible agent.
Benchmark evidence is limited
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 95/100, grounding 68/100, status medium.
Implementation
No direct implementation yet
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.
No verified maintained repo yet
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Time to first repro: a few days
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
- Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow
Reproduction readiness
No repo
No verified implementation available
- No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Datasets
Spaces
Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Research context
Tasks
Agentic tool use
Methods
Transformer
Domains
Large Language Models, AI Agents
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.