Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

CoLFA: Collaboration-Guided Lightweight Failure Attribution for LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems

Yufei Luo, Yuchen Ling, Chunrong FangPublished Nov 11, 2026
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Context only
Use as context only
Benchmark evidence
Thin evidence
Verify before relying
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
2
Review before use

Abstract

Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.

Failure attribution in multi-agent systems requires tracing error formation to identify the decisive error step and the responsible agent. However, agents' division of work and information exchange lead to Interleaved Steps and Cluttered Content, requiring models to link executions and check details in lengthy records. This makes it difficult to balance localization accuracy and token cost. We find that multi-agent collaboration also leaves records of how executions connect and content passes between them as results are formed, providing evidence for tracing error formation. Based on this observation, we propose CoLFA (Collaboration-Guided Lightweight Failure Attribution), which uses collaboration cues to organize the attribution input according to how results are formed, determining which steps are examined and how their content is presented. Through Handoff-Guided Step Expansion and Cross-Referenced Content Organization, CoLFA helps the model focus on examining error formation and the role of each decision while reducing the processing of irrelevant and repeated records. Across five settings spanning Who&When and LongRCA and three backbone models, CoLFA achieves the highest exact step-localization accuracy with the lowest token consumption. Compared with individual baselines in each setting, CoLFA improves accuracy by up to 37.50% and reduces token consumption by up to 97.6%.

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: hot
Failure attribution in multi-agent systems requires tracing error formation to identify the decisive error step and the responsible agent.

Implementation

No direct implementation yet

Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.

Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.

Implementation evidence summary
Confidence: low

Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.

Reproduction risks
  • Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Nov 14, 2026

No repo

No verified implementation available

  • No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

Tasks

Agentic tool use

Methods

Transformer

Domains

Large Language Models, AI Agents

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.