Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies
← Back to explorer

Tag: Math

Math evaluation papers that call for domain expertise or specialist review (141 papers).

Papers in tag: 141

Need Math evaluators for your project?

Post a Job →

Research Utility Snapshot

Evaluation Modes

  • Automatic Metrics (12)
  • Simulation Env (1)

Human Feedback Types

  • Pairwise Preference (7)
  • Critique Edit (4)
  • Expert Verification (1)

Required Expertise

  • Math (20)
  • Coding (7)
  • Law (3)
Towards Reward Modeling for AI Tutors in Math Mistake Remediation

Kseniia Petukhova, Ekaterina Kochmar · Mar 25, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference Automatic Metrics Math
  • We develop and release Bradley-Terry preference models trained on weighted-sum rankings that we automatically create from MRBench, synthetic pairs, and data combinations.
  • Using only synthetic data, our best model reaches 0.69 pairwise accuracy on a human preference test, and combining weighted-sum data with targeted synthetic groups improves accuracy to 0.74, outperforming larger general-purpose reward…
Generating and Evaluating Sustainable Procurement Criteria for the Swiss Public Sector using In-Context Prompting with Large Language Models

Yingqiang Gao, Veton Matoshi, Luca Rolshoven, Tilia Ellendorff, Judith Binder, Jeremy Austin Jann · Mar 23, 2026 · Citations: 0

Expert Verification MathLaw
  • Swiss law requires the integration of ecological, social, and economic sustainability requirements into tender evaluations in the format of criteria that have to be fulfilled by a bidder.
  • We evaluate the system through a combination of automated quality checks, including an LLM-based evaluation component, and expert comparison against a manually curated gold standard.
Adaptive Robust Estimator for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

Zhongyi Li, Wan Tian, Jingyu Chen, Kangyao Huang, Huiming Zhang, Hui Yang · Mar 23, 2026 · Citations: 0

Critique Edit Math
  • Multi-agent collaboration has emerged as a powerful paradigm for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models, yet it suffers from interaction-level ambiguity that blurs generation, critique, and revision, making credit…
  • To address both issues, we propose a robust multi-agent reinforcement learning framework for collaborative reasoning, consisting of two components: Dual-Agent Answer-Critique-Rewrite (DACR) and an Adaptive Robust Estimator (ARE).
PAVE: Premise-Aware Validation and Editing for Retrieval-Augmented LLMs

Tianyi Huang, Caden Yang, Emily Yin, Eric Wang, Michael Zhang · Mar 21, 2026 · Citations: 0

Critique Edit Automatic Metrics Math
  • In controlled ablations with a fixed retriever and backbone, PAVE outperforms simpler post-retrieval baselines in two evidence-grounded QA settings, with the largest gain reaching 32.7 accuracy points on a span-grounded benchmark.
Mi:dm K 2.5 Pro

KT Tech innovation Group · Mar 19, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics MathCoding
  • The evolving LLM landscape requires capabilities beyond simple text generation, prioritizing multi-step reasoning, long-context understanding, and agentic workflows.
  • The evaluations show that Mi:dm K 2.5 Pro achieves competitive performance against leading global and domestic models.
TARo: Token-level Adaptive Routing for LLM Test-time Alignment

Arushi Rai, Qiang Zhang, Hanqing Zeng, Yunkai Zhang, Dipesh Tamboli, Xiangjun Fan · Mar 19, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference MathMedicine
  • Recent test-time alignment methods offer a lightweight alternative, but have been explored mainly for preference alignment rather than reasoning.
  • Furthermore, TARo also generalizes from small to large backbones without retraining, extending test-time alignment from preference optimization to robust, cross-domain reasoning.
RAWR: Reward Assignment Without Rollouts in Verifiable Domains

Corentin Royer, Anna Hedström, Debarun Bhattacharjya, Gaetano Rossiello, Andrea Giovannini, Mennatallah El-Assady · Mar 18, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics MathCoding
  • However, training them requires costly human annotation or computationally intensive rollout-based labeling.
  • We show that the signal produced by MCNIG correlates with human judgments of step quality, and we apply MCNIG labels to train PRMs that achieve the best average best-of-K accuracy across eight benchmarks spanning mathematics, code…
Truth as a Compression Artifact in Language Model Training

Konstantin Krestnikov · Mar 12, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference Automatic Metrics MathCoding
  • In the random-error setting, models strongly prefer correct completions in paired evaluation: 83.1% accuracy at balanced data and 67.0% even when correct rules appear in only 10% of the corpus.
  • Replacing random errors with a coherent but mathematically incorrect rule system largely eliminates the preference (near-chance accuracy).
Maximizing Mutual Information Between Prompt and Response Improves LLM Performance With No Additional Data

Hyunji Nam, Haoran Li, Natasha Jaques · Mar 10, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference Math
  • We propose **Mutual Information Preference Optimization (MIPO)**, a contrastive data augmentation method that constructs preference pairs by generating a positive response conditioning on the correct prompt, and a negative response by…
  • We show that using Direct Preference Optimization to learn from this paired data maximizes pointwise mutual information *under the base LLM* between prompts and model responses.
You Didn't Have to Say It like That: Subliminal Learning from Faithful Paraphrases

Isaia Gisler, Zhonghao He, Tianyi Qiu · Mar 10, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference MathCoding
  • We investigate whether transmission occurs through natural language paraphrases with fixed semantic content, and whether content explicitly contradicting the teacher's preference can block it.
  • We find that training on paraphrases from a teacher system-prompted to love a particular animal increases a student's preference for that animal by up to 19 percentage points.
Proof-of-Guardrail in AI Agents and What (Not) to Trust from It

Xisen Jin, Michael Duan, Qin Lin, Aaron Chan, Zhenglun Chen, Junyi Du · Mar 6, 2026 · Citations: 0

Red Team Automatic Metrics MathLaw
  • As AI agents become widely deployed as online services, users often rely on an agent developer's claim about how safety is enforced, which introduces a threat where safety measures are falsely advertised.
  • To generate proof, the developer runs the agent and guardrail inside a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE), which produces a TEE-signed attestation of guardrail code execution verifiable by any user offline.
Replaying pre-training data improves fine-tuning

Suhas Kotha, Percy Liang · Mar 5, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics Math
  • We demonstrate the success of replay in practice for fine-tuning 8B parameter models, improving agentic web navigation success by 4.5\% and Basque question-answering accuracy by 2\%.
HACHIMI: Scalable and Controllable Student Persona Generation via Orchestrated Agents

Yilin Jiang, Fei Tan, Xuanyu Yin, Jing Leng, Aimin Zhou · Mar 5, 2026 · Citations: 0

Simulation Env Math
  • We formalize this as Theory-Aligned and Distribution-Controllable Persona Generation (TAD-PG) and introduce HACHIMI, a multi-agent Propose-Validate-Revise framework that generates theory-aligned, quota-controlled personas.
  • Intrinsic evaluation shows near-perfect schema validity, accurate quotas, and substantial diversity, while external evaluation instantiates personas as student agents answering CEPS and PISA 2022 surveys; across 16 cohorts, math and…
$V_1$: Unifying Generation and Self-Verification for Parallel Reasoners

Harman Singh, Xiuyu Li, Kusha Sareen, Monishwaran Maheswaran, Sijun Tan, Xiaoxia Wu · Mar 4, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference Automatic Metrics MathCoding
  • On code generation (LiveCodeBench, CodeContests, SWE-Bench) and math reasoning (AIME, HMMT) benchmarks, V_1-Infer improves Pass@1 by up to 10% over pointwise verification and outperforms recent test-time scaling methods while being…