Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies
← Back to explorer

Tag: Math

Math evaluation papers that call for domain expertise or specialist review (123 papers).

Papers in tag: 123

Need Math evaluators for your project?

Post a Job →

Research Utility Snapshot

Evaluation Modes

  • Automatic Metrics (13)
  • Human Eval (1)
  • Llm As Judge (1)

Human Feedback Types

  • Pairwise Preference (6)
  • Critique Edit (2)
  • Expert Verification (1)

Required Expertise

  • Math (20)
  • Coding (9)
  • Law (1)
Proof-of-Guardrail in AI Agents and What (Not) to Trust from It

Xisen Jin, Michael Duan, Qin Lin, Aaron Chan, Zhenglun Chen, Junyi Du · Mar 6, 2026 · Citations: 0

Red Team Automatic Metrics MathLaw
  • As AI agents become widely deployed as online services, users often rely on an agent developer's claim about how safety is enforced, which introduces a threat where safety measures are falsely advertised.
  • To generate proof, the developer runs the agent and guardrail inside a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE), which produces a TEE-signed attestation of guardrail code execution verifiable by any user offline.
Replaying pre-training data improves fine-tuning

Suhas Kotha, Percy Liang · Mar 5, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics Math
  • We demonstrate the success of replay in practice for fine-tuning 8B parameter models, improving agentic web navigation success by 4.5\% and Basque question-answering accuracy by 2\%.
HACHIMI: Scalable and Controllable Student Persona Generation via Orchestrated Agents

Yilin Jiang, Fei Tan, Xuanyu Yin, Jing Leng, Aimin Zhou · Mar 5, 2026 · Citations: 0

Simulation Env Math
  • We formalize this as Theory-Aligned and Distribution-Controllable Persona Generation (TAD-PG) and introduce HACHIMI, a multi-agent Propose-Validate-Revise framework that generates theory-aligned, quota-controlled personas.
  • Intrinsic evaluation shows near-perfect schema validity, accurate quotas, and substantial diversity, while external evaluation instantiates personas as student agents answering CEPS and PISA 2022 surveys; across 16 cohorts, math and…
$V_1$: Unifying Generation and Self-Verification for Parallel Reasoners

Harman Singh, Xiuyu Li, Kusha Sareen, Monishwaran Maheswaran, Sijun Tan, Xiaoxia Wu · Mar 4, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference Automatic Metrics MathCoding
  • On code generation (LiveCodeBench, CodeContests, SWE-Bench) and math reasoning (AIME, HMMT) benchmarks, V_1-Infer improves Pass@1 by up to 10% over pointwise verification and outperforms recent test-time scaling methods while being…
GenDB: The Next Generation of Query Processing -- Synthesized, Not Engineered

Jiale Lao, Immanuel Trummer · Mar 2, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics MathCoding
  • As a proof of concept, we present GenDB, an LLM-powered agentic system that generates instance-optimized and customized query execution code tailored to specific data, workloads, and hardware resources.
  • We implemented an early prototype of GenDB that uses Claude Code Agent as the underlying component in the multi-agent system, and we evaluate it on OLAP workloads.
EstLLM: Enhancing Estonian Capabilities in Multilingual LLMs via Continued Pretraining and Post-Training

Aleksei Dorkin, Taido Purason, Emil Kalbaliyev, Hele-Andra Kuulmets, Marii Ojastu, Mark Fišel · Mar 2, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference MathCoding
  • We subsequently apply supervised fine-tuning, preference optimization, and chat vector merging to introduce robust instruction-following behavior.
  • Evaluation on a comprehensive suite of Estonian benchmarks shows consistent gains in linguistic competence, knowledge, reasoning, translation quality, and instruction-following compared to the original base model and its instruction-tuned…
Surgical Post-Training: Cutting Errors, Keeping Knowledge

Wenye Lin, Kai Han · Mar 2, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference Automatic Metrics MathCoding
  • While prior research emphasizes the role of on-policy data in mitigating forgetting, we uncover--and validate both theoretically and empirically--an overlooked yet critical mechanism: the implicit regularization inherent in Direct…
Reasoning Boosts Opinion Alignment in LLMs

Frédéric Berdoz, Yann Billeter, Yann Vonlanthen, Roger Wattenhofer · Mar 1, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference Math
  • Opinion modeling aims to capture individual or group political preferences, enabling applications such as digital democracies, where models could help shape fairer and more popular policies.
AgentDropoutV2: Optimizing Information Flow in Multi-Agent Systems via Test-Time Rectify-or-Reject Pruning

Yutong Wang, Siyuan Xiong, Xuebo Liu, Wenkang Zhou, Liang Ding, Miao Zhang · Feb 26, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics MathCoding
  • We propose AgentDropoutV2 (ADv2), a test-time rectify-or-reject pruning framework that dynamically optimizes MAS information flow.
  • Empirical results demonstrate that ADv2 significantly boosts performance on both fixed and dynamic MAS frameworks, achieving average accuracy gains of 6.39 and 2.28 percentage points on extensive math and code benchmarks, respectively.
Test-Time Scaling with Diffusion Language Models via Reward-Guided Stitching

Roy Miles, Aysim Toker, Andreea-Maria Oncescu, Songcen Xu, Jiankang Deng, Ismail Elezi · Feb 26, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics MathCoding
  • This modular pipeline separates exploration (diffusion) from evaluation and solution synthesis, avoiding monolithic unified hybrids while preserving broad search.
  • Across math reasoning benchmarks, we find that step-level recombination is most beneficial on harder problems, and ablations highlight the importance of the final AR solver in converting stitched but imperfect rationales into accurate…
The AI Research Assistant: Promise, Peril, and a Proof of Concept

Tan Bui-Thanh · Feb 26, 2026 · Citations: 0

Expert Verification Math
  • We provide empirical evidence through a detailed case study: the discovery of novel error representations and bounds for Hermite quadrature rules via systematic human-AI collaboration.
  • However, every step required rigorous human verification, mathematical intuition for problem formulation, and strategic direction.
Duel-Evolve: Reward-Free Test-Time Scaling via LLM Self-Preferences

Sweta Karlekar, Carolina Zheng, Magnus Saebo, Nicolas Beltran-Velez, Shuyang Yu, John Bowlan · Feb 25, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference Automatic Metrics Math
  • Building on this observation, we introduce Duel-Evolve, an evolutionary optimization algorithm that replaces external scalar rewards with pairwise preferences elicited from the same LLM used to generate candidates.
  • Results show that pairwise self-preferences provide strong optimization signal for test-time improvement over large, discrete output spaces.
Think$^{2}$: Grounded Metacognitive Reasoning in Large Language Models

Abraham Paul Elenjical, Vivek Hruday Kavuri, Vasudeva Varma · Feb 21, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference Human Eval MathMedicine
  • We introduce a psychologically grounded metacognitive framework that operationalizes Ann Brown's regulatory cycle (Planning, Monitoring, and Evaluation) as a structured prompting architecture, and study its integration within a lightweight…
  • Blinded human evaluations over 580 query pairs show an 84% aggregate preference for trustworthiness and metacognitive self-awareness over standard and Chain-of-Thought baselines.
Gradient Regularization Prevents Reward Hacking in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback and Verifiable Rewards

Johannes Ackermann, Michael Noukhovitch, Takashi Ishida, Masashi Sugiyama · Feb 20, 2026 · Citations: 0

Llm As JudgeAutomatic Metrics Math
  • Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) or Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) are two key steps in the post-training of modern Language Models (LMs).
  • GR achieves a higher GPT-judged win-rate in RLHF, avoids overly focusing on the format in rule-based math rewards, and prevents hacking the judge in LLM-as-a-Judge math tasks.