Skip to content
← Back to explorer

Mi:dm K 2.5 Pro

KT Tech innovation Group · Mar 19, 2026 · Citations: 0

How to use this page

Low trust

Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.

Best use

Background context only

What to verify

Validate the evaluation procedure and quality controls in the full paper before operational use.

Evidence quality

Low

Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.

Abstract

The evolving LLM landscape requires capabilities beyond simple text generation, prioritizing multi-step reasoning, long-context understanding, and agentic workflows. This shift challenges existing models in enterprise environments, especially in Korean-language and domain-specific scenarios where scaling is insufficient. We introduce Mi:dm K 2.5 Pro, a 32B parameter flagship LLM designed to address enterprise-grade complexity through reasoning-focused optimization. Our methodology builds a robust data foundation via a quality-centric curation pipeline utilizing abstract syntax tree (AST) analysis for code, gap-filling synthesis for mathematics, and an LLM-based quality evaluator. Pre-training scales the model via layer-predictor-based Depth Upscaling (DuS) and a progressive strategy supporting a 128K token context window. Post-training introduces a specialized multi-stage pipeline, including Reasoning SFT, model merging, and asynchronous reinforcement learning (RL), to develop complex problem-solving skills. "Fusion Training" then rebalances these capabilities with conversational fluency, consistent response styling, and reliable tool-use. The evaluations show that Mi:dm K 2.5 Pro achieves competitive performance against leading global and domestic models. In addition, it sets state-of-the-art results on Korean-specific benchmarks, showcasing deep linguistic and cultural understanding. Finally, Responsible AI evaluations validate safety against attacks, ensuring a secure profile for deployment with a balance of harmlessness and responsiveness.

Low-signal caution for protocol decisions

Use this page for context, then validate protocol choices against stronger HFEPX references before implementation decisions.

  • The available metadata is too thin to trust this as a primary source.

Should You Rely On This Paper?

This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.

Main weakness

The available metadata is too thin to trust this as a primary source.

Trust level

Low

Usefulness score

25/100 • Low

Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Detected

Usefulness for eval research

Adjacent candidate

Extraction confidence 45%

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

missing

None explicit

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

"The evolving LLM landscape requires capabilities beyond simple text generation, prioritizing multi-step reasoning, long-context understanding, and agentic workflows."

Evaluation Modes

partial

Automatic Metrics

Includes extracted eval setup.

"The evolving LLM landscape requires capabilities beyond simple text generation, prioritizing multi-step reasoning, long-context understanding, and agentic workflows."

Quality Controls

missing

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"The evolving LLM landscape requires capabilities beyond simple text generation, prioritizing multi-step reasoning, long-context understanding, and agentic workflows."

Benchmarks / Datasets

missing

Not extracted

No benchmark anchors detected.

"The evolving LLM landscape requires capabilities beyond simple text generation, prioritizing multi-step reasoning, long-context understanding, and agentic workflows."

Reported Metrics

partial

Harmlessness

Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.

"Finally, Responsible AI evaluations validate safety against attacks, ensuring a secure profile for deployment with a balance of harmlessness and responsiveness."

Human Feedback Details

  • Uses human feedback: No
  • Feedback types: None
  • Rater population: Not reported
  • Expertise required: Math, Coding

Evaluation Details

  • Evaluation modes: Automatic Metrics
  • Agentic eval: Long Horizon
  • Quality controls: Not reported
  • Evidence quality: Low
  • Use this page as: Background context only

Protocol And Measurement Signals

Benchmarks / Datasets

No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.

Reported Metrics

harmlessness

Research Brief

Metadata summary

The evolving LLM landscape requires capabilities beyond simple text generation, prioritizing multi-step reasoning, long-context understanding, and agentic workflows.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • The evolving LLM landscape requires capabilities beyond simple text generation, prioritizing multi-step reasoning, long-context understanding, and agentic workflows.
  • This shift challenges existing models in enterprise environments, especially in Korean-language and domain-specific scenarios where scaling is insufficient.
  • We introduce Mi:dm K 2.5 Pro, a 32B parameter flagship LLM designed to address enterprise-grade complexity through reasoning-focused optimization.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Validate inferred eval signals (Long-horizon tasks) against the full paper.
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended Queries

Research Summary

Contribution Summary

  • The evolving LLM landscape requires capabilities beyond simple text generation, prioritizing multi-step reasoning, long-context understanding, and agentic workflows.
  • We introduce Mi:dm K 2.5 Pro, a 32B parameter flagship LLM designed to address enterprise-grade complexity through reasoning-focused optimization.
  • The evaluations show that Mi:dm K 2.5 Pro achieves competitive performance against leading global and domestic models.

Why It Matters For Eval

  • The evolving LLM landscape requires capabilities beyond simple text generation, prioritizing multi-step reasoning, long-context understanding, and agentic workflows.
  • The evaluations show that Mi:dm K 2.5 Pro achieves competitive performance against leading global and domestic models.

Researcher Checklist

  • Gap: Human feedback protocol is explicit

    No explicit human feedback protocol detected.

  • Pass: Evaluation mode is explicit

    Detected: Automatic Metrics

  • Gap: Quality control reporting appears

    No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.

  • Gap: Benchmark or dataset anchors are present

    No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.

  • Pass: Metric reporting is present

    Detected: harmlessness

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

Get Started

Join the #1 Platform for AI Training Talent

Where top AI builders and expert AI Trainers connect to build the future of AI.
Self-Service
Post a Job
Post your project and get a shortlist of qualified AI Trainers and Data Labelers. Hire and manage your team in the tools you already use.
Managed Service
For Large Projects
Done-for-You
We recruit, onboard, and manage a dedicated team inside your tools. End-to-end operations for large or complex projects.
For Freelancers
Join as an AI Trainer
Find AI training and data labeling projects across platforms, all in one place. One profile, one application process, more opportunities.