Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

HFEPX · Eval paper review

CoLFA: Collaboration-Guided Lightweight Failure Attribution for LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems

Yufei Luo, Yuchen Ling, Chunrong Fang

Published

Nov 11, 2026

Citations

0

Trust level

Low

Usefulness score

25/100 (Low)

Extraction confidence

45% (Low)

Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.

Rater population

Not reported

Signals refreshed

Nov 11, 2026

Should you rely on this paper?

This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.

Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.

What to verify

Validate the evaluation procedure and quality controls in the full paper before operational use.

Main weakness

The available metadata is too thin to trust this as a primary source.

Human feedback signal
Not explicit
Not explicit in abstract metadata
Evaluation signal
Detected
Eval setup described
Usefulness for eval research
25/100
Adjacent candidate

Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.

Abstract

Failure attribution in multi-agent systems requires tracing error formation to identify the decisive error step and the responsible agent. However, agents' division of work and information exchange lead to Interleaved Steps and Cluttered Content, requiring models to link executions and check details in lengthy records. This makes it difficult to balance localization accuracy and token cost. We find that multi-agent collaboration also leaves records of how executions connect and content passes between them as results are formed, providing evidence for tracing error formation. Based on this observation, we propose CoLFA (Collaboration-Guided Lightweight Failure Attribution), which uses collaboration cues to organize the attribution input according to how results are formed, determining which steps are examined and how their content is presented. Through Handoff-Guided Step Expansion and Cross-Referenced Content Organization, CoLFA helps the model focus on examining error formation and the role of each decision while reducing the processing of irrelevant and repeated records. Across five settings spanning Who&When and LongRCA and three backbone models, CoLFA achieves the highest exact step-localization accuracy with the lowest token consumption. Compared with individual baselines in each setting, CoLFA improves accuracy by up to 37.50% and reduces token consumption by up to 97.6%.

What we could verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

missing

None explicit

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

"Failure attribution in multi-agent systems requires tracing error formation to identify the decisive error step and the responsible agent."

Evaluation Modes

partial

Automatic Metrics

Includes extracted eval setup.

"Failure attribution in multi-agent systems requires tracing error formation to identify the decisive error step and the responsible agent."

Quality Controls

missing

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"Failure attribution in multi-agent systems requires tracing error formation to identify the decisive error step and the responsible agent."

Benchmarks / Datasets

missing

Not extracted

No benchmark anchors detected.

"Failure attribution in multi-agent systems requires tracing error formation to identify the decisive error step and the responsible agent."

Reported Metrics

partial

Accuracy

Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.

"This makes it difficult to balance localization accuracy and token cost."

Benchmarks and datasets

No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.

Reported metrics

accuracy
Human feedback details
Uses human feedback
No
Feedback types
None
Rater population
Not reported
Expertise required
General
Evaluation details
Evaluation modes
Automatic Metrics
Agentic eval
Multi Agent
Quality controls
Not reported
Evidence quality
Low
Use this page as
Background context only

Research brief

Metadata summary

Failure attribution in multi-agent systems requires tracing error formation to identify the decisive error step and the responsible agent.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key takeaways

  • Failure attribution in multi-agent systems requires tracing error formation to identify the decisive error step and the responsible agent.
  • However, agents' division of work and information exchange lead to Interleaved Steps and Cluttered Content, requiring models to link executions and check details in lengthy records.
  • This makes it difficult to balance localization accuracy and token cost.

Researcher actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Validate inferred eval signals (Automatic metrics) against the full paper.
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended queries

Contribution summary

  • Failure attribution in multi-agent systems requires tracing error formation to identify the decisive error step and the responsible agent.
  • However, agents' division of work and information exchange lead to Interleaved Steps and Cluttered Content, requiring models to link executions and check details in lengthy records.

Researcher checklist

  • Human feedback protocol is explicit

    No explicit human feedback protocol detected.

  • Evaluation mode is explicit

    Detected: Automatic Metrics

  • Quality control reporting appears

    No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.

  • Benchmark or dataset anchors are present

    No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.

  • Metric reporting is present

    Detected: accuracy