Human Feedback Types
missingNone explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"Failure attribution in multi-agent systems requires tracing error formation to identify the decisive error step and the responsible agent."
HFEPX · Eval paper review
Yufei Luo, Yuchen Ling, Chunrong Fang
Published
Nov 11, 2026
Citations
0
Trust level
Low
Usefulness score
25/100 (Low)
Extraction confidence
45% (Low)
Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.
Rater population
Not reported
Signals refreshed
Nov 11, 2026
This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.
Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.
Use this page for context, then validate protocol choices against stronger HFEPX references before implementation decisions.
Best use
Background context only
Use if you need
A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.
What to verify
Validate the evaluation procedure and quality controls in the full paper before operational use.
Main weakness
The available metadata is too thin to trust this as a primary source.
Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.
If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here
Failure attribution in multi-agent systems requires tracing error formation to identify the decisive error step and the responsible agent. However, agents' division of work and information exchange lead to Interleaved Steps and Cluttered Content, requiring models to link executions and check details in lengthy records. This makes it difficult to balance localization accuracy and token cost. We find that multi-agent collaboration also leaves records of how executions connect and content passes between them as results are formed, providing evidence for tracing error formation. Based on this observation, we propose CoLFA (Collaboration-Guided Lightweight Failure Attribution), which uses collaboration cues to organize the attribution input according to how results are formed, determining which steps are examined and how their content is presented. Through Handoff-Guided Step Expansion and Cross-Referenced Content Organization, CoLFA helps the model focus on examining error formation and the role of each decision while reducing the processing of irrelevant and repeated records. Across five settings spanning Who&When and LongRCA and three backbone models, CoLFA achieves the highest exact step-localization accuracy with the lowest token consumption. Compared with individual baselines in each setting, CoLFA improves accuracy by up to 37.50% and reduces token consumption by up to 97.6%.
These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.
None explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"Failure attribution in multi-agent systems requires tracing error formation to identify the decisive error step and the responsible agent."
Automatic Metrics
Includes extracted eval setup.
"Failure attribution in multi-agent systems requires tracing error formation to identify the decisive error step and the responsible agent."
Not reported
No explicit QC controls found.
"Failure attribution in multi-agent systems requires tracing error formation to identify the decisive error step and the responsible agent."
Not extracted
No benchmark anchors detected.
"Failure attribution in multi-agent systems requires tracing error formation to identify the decisive error step and the responsible agent."
Accuracy
Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.
"This makes it difficult to balance localization accuracy and token cost."
No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.
Failure attribution in multi-agent systems requires tracing error formation to identify the decisive error step and the responsible agent.
Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.
Human feedback protocol is explicit
No explicit human feedback protocol detected.
Evaluation mode is explicit
Detected: Automatic Metrics
Quality control reporting appears
No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.
Benchmark or dataset anchors are present
No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.
Metric reporting is present
Detected: accuracy