Human Feedback Types
strongRubric Rating
Directly usable for protocol triage.
"Emergencies can occur where there is no phone signal and no ambulance nearby."
HFEPX · Eval paper review
Rezwan Islam Salvi, Saiyma Sittul Muna, Mushfiqur Rahman Mushfique
Published
Nov 10, 2026
Citations
0
Trust level
Moderate
Usefulness score
57/100 (Medium)
Extraction confidence
65% (Moderate)
Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.
Rater population
Not reported
Signals refreshed
Nov 10, 2026
This paper has useful evaluation signal, but protocol completeness is partial; pair it with related papers before deciding implementation strategy.
Use this for comparison and orientation, not as your only source.
Use this page for context, then validate protocol choices against stronger HFEPX references before implementation decisions.
Best use
Secondary protocol comparison source
Use if you need
A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.
What to verify
Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.
Main weakness
The abstract does not clearly name benchmarks or metrics.
Useful as a secondary reference; validate protocol details against neighboring papers.
If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here
Emergencies can occur where there is no phone signal and no ambulance nearby. A small language model on a phone can be helpful in such situations, but its advice needs to be safe and accurate. We built HandsOnAid, a 4-bit Gemma 2B model fine-tuned with QLoRA on FirstAidQA dataset, a corpus of 5,550 first-aid question-answer pairs. We compared seven configurations, including the base, 4-bit and 8-bit fine-tuned models, and versions with a length floor, safety gate, or retrieval. We used a 41-pair question-answer bank with medically reviewed references that followed ANZCOR guidelines, and a strict 0-5 score rubric, with twelve safety overrides. Four frontier LLM judges (GPT-5.6 Sol, Claude Opus 5, DeepSeek V4 Pro, GLM-5.3) blindly scored every answer, with 45 hidden controls used to check judge reliability. Fine-tuning improved the mean score by +1.08 over the base model to 2.34. The best configuration scored 2.51 out of 5 which was the fine-tuned 4-bit model with retrieval. A medical professional also conducted a blind evaluation of 40 answers across the base, the 4-bit fine-tuned, and the retrieval configurations, and the scores were similar to the LLM judges' average scores. A keyword audit found limited coverage of several details of ANZCOR guidelines in the training corpus, that are required by the rubric, which suggests that missing information in the training data could be a cause of the low scores. On a smartphone device (Pixel 7 Pro) with six CPU threads and no network connection, the 4-bit fine-tuned model produced its first displayable text in 6.86 seconds and a complete answer in 14.88 seconds on average over ten questions.
These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.
Rubric Rating
Directly usable for protocol triage.
"Emergencies can occur where there is no phone signal and no ambulance nearby."
Llm As Judge
Includes extracted eval setup.
"Emergencies can occur where there is no phone signal and no ambulance nearby."
Not reported
No explicit QC controls found.
"Emergencies can occur where there is no phone signal and no ambulance nearby."
Not extracted
No benchmark anchors detected.
"Emergencies can occur where there is no phone signal and no ambulance nearby."
Not extracted
No metric anchors detected.
"Emergencies can occur where there is no phone signal and no ambulance nearby."
No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.
No metric terms were extracted from the available abstract.
Emergencies can occur where there is no phone signal and no ambulance nearby.
Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.
Human feedback protocol is explicit
Detected: Rubric Rating
Evaluation mode is explicit
Detected: Llm As Judge
Quality control reporting appears
No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.
Benchmark or dataset anchors are present
No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.
Metric reporting is present
No metric terms extracted.