Human Feedback Types
strongExpert Verification
Directly usable for protocol triage.
"While automated sleep staging has achieved expert-level accuracy, its clinical adoption is hindered by a lack of auditable reasoning."
HFEPX · Eval paper review
Guifeng Deng, Pan Wang, Jiquan Wang, Shuying Rao +4 more
Published
Mar 22, 2026
Citations
0
Trust level
High
Usefulness score
75/100 (High)
Extraction confidence
80% (High)
Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.
Rater population
Domain Experts
Signals refreshed
Mar 31, 2026
This paper has strong direct human-feedback and evaluation protocol signal and is suitable as a primary eval pipeline reference.
Use this as a practical starting point for protocol research, then validate against the original paper.
Best use
Primary protocol reference for eval design
Use if you need
A concrete protocol example with enough signal to inform rater workflow design.
What to verify
Validate the exact study setup in the full paper before operational use.
Main weakness
No major weakness surfaced.
Use this as a primary source when designing or comparing eval protocols.
If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here
While automated sleep staging has achieved expert-level accuracy, its clinical adoption is hindered by a lack of auditable reasoning. We introduce SleepVLM, a rule-grounded vision-language model (VLM) designed to stage sleep from multi-channel polysomnography (PSG) waveform images while generating clinician-readable rationales based on American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) scoring criteria. Utilizing waveform-perceptual pre-training and rule-grounded supervised fine-tuning, SleepVLM achieved Cohen's kappa scores of 0.767 on an held out test set (MASS-SS1) and 0.743 on an external cohort (ZUAMHCS), matching state-of-the-art performance. Expert evaluations further validated the quality of the model's reasoning, with mean scores exceeding 4.0/5.0 for factual accuracy, evidence comprehensiveness, and logical coherence. By coupling competitive performance with transparent, rule-based explanations, SleepVLM may improve the trustworthiness and auditability of automated sleep staging in clinical workflows. To facilitate further research in interpretable sleep medicine, we release MASS-EX, a novel expert-annotated dataset.
These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.
Expert Verification
Directly usable for protocol triage.
"While automated sleep staging has achieved expert-level accuracy, its clinical adoption is hindered by a lack of auditable reasoning."
Automatic Metrics
Includes extracted eval setup.
"While automated sleep staging has achieved expert-level accuracy, its clinical adoption is hindered by a lack of auditable reasoning."
Inter Annotator Agreement Reported
Calibration/adjudication style controls detected.
"While automated sleep staging has achieved expert-level accuracy, its clinical adoption is hindered by a lack of auditable reasoning."
Not extracted
No benchmark anchors detected.
"While automated sleep staging has achieved expert-level accuracy, its clinical adoption is hindered by a lack of auditable reasoning."
Accuracy, Kappa, Coherence
Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.
"While automated sleep staging has achieved expert-level accuracy, its clinical adoption is hindered by a lack of auditable reasoning."
Domain Experts
Helpful for staffing comparability.
"While automated sleep staging has achieved expert-level accuracy, its clinical adoption is hindered by a lack of auditable reasoning."
No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.
While automated sleep staging has achieved expert-level accuracy, its clinical adoption is hindered by a lack of auditable reasoning.
Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.
Human feedback protocol is explicit
Detected: Expert Verification
Evaluation mode is explicit
Detected: Automatic Metrics
Quality control reporting appears
Detected: Inter Annotator Agreement Reported
Benchmark or dataset anchors are present
No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.
Metric reporting is present
Detected: accuracy, kappa, coherence