Human Feedback Types
missingNone explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"In this technical report, we present SWE-Master, an open-source and fully reproducible post-training framework for building effective software engineering agents."
HFEPX · Eval paper review
Huatong Song, Lisheng Huang, Shuang Sun, Jinhao Jiang +10 more
Published
Feb 3, 2026
Citations
0
Trust level
Low
Usefulness score
0/100 (Low)
Extraction confidence
25% (Low)
Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.
Rater population
Not reported
Signals refreshed
Feb 24, 2026
This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.
Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.
All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.
Best use
Background context only
Use if you need
A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.
What to verify
Validate the evaluation procedure and quality controls in the full paper before operational use.
Main weakness
This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.
Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.
If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here
In this technical report, we present SWE-Master, an open-source and fully reproducible post-training framework for building effective software engineering agents. SWE-Master systematically explores the complete agent development pipeline, including teacher-trajectory synthesis and data curation, long-horizon SFT, RL with real execution feedback, and inference framework design. Starting from an open-source base model with limited initial SWE capability, SWE-Master demonstrates how systematical optimization method can elicit strong long-horizon SWE task solving abilities. We evaluate SWE-Master on SWE-bench Verified, a standard benchmark for realistic software engineering tasks. Under identical experimental settings, our approach achieves a resolve rate of 61.4\% with Qwen2.5-Coder-32B, substantially outperforming existing open-source baselines. By further incorporating test-time scaling~(TTS) with LLM-based environment feedback, SWE-Master reaches 70.8\% at TTS@8, demonstrating a strong performance potential. SWE-Master provides a practical and transparent foundation for advancing reproducible research on software engineering agents. The code is available at https://github.com/RUCAIBox/SWE-Master.
These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.
None explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"In this technical report, we present SWE-Master, an open-source and fully reproducible post-training framework for building effective software engineering agents."
None explicit
Validate eval design from full paper text.
"In this technical report, we present SWE-Master, an open-source and fully reproducible post-training framework for building effective software engineering agents."
Not reported
No explicit QC controls found.
"In this technical report, we present SWE-Master, an open-source and fully reproducible post-training framework for building effective software engineering agents."
SWE Bench, SWE Bench Verified
Useful for quick benchmark comparison.
"We evaluate SWE-Master on SWE-bench Verified, a standard benchmark for realistic software engineering tasks."
Not extracted
No metric anchors detected.
"In this technical report, we present SWE-Master, an open-source and fully reproducible post-training framework for building effective software engineering agents."
No metric terms were extracted from the available abstract.
In this technical report, we present SWE-Master, an open-source and fully reproducible post-training framework for building effective software engineering agents.
Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.
Human feedback protocol is explicit
No explicit human feedback protocol detected.
Evaluation mode is explicit
No clear evaluation mode extracted.
Quality control reporting appears
No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.
Benchmark or dataset anchors are present
Detected: SWE-bench, SWE-bench Verified
Metric reporting is present
No metric terms extracted.