Human Feedback Types
missingNone explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"With external tools, large language models (LLMs) can tackle complex tasks through sustained environmental interaction."
HFEPX · Eval paper review
Rumei Li, Xunliang Cai
Published
Oct 22, 2026
Citations
0
Trust level
Low
Usefulness score
0/100 (Low)
Extraction confidence
15% (Low)
Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.
Rater population
Not reported
Signals refreshed
Oct 22, 2026
This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.
Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.
All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.
Best use
Background context only
Use if you need
A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.
What to verify
Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.
Main weakness
This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.
Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.
If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here
With external tools, large language models (LLMs) can tackle complex tasks through sustained environmental interaction. LLM-based agents are therefore increasingly used to tackle complex long-horizon tasks in real-world environments. However, these tasks involve sequential, interdependent decisions and changes in environmental states. Early execution errors affect subsequent interaction histories and environmental states, and their effects accumulate along the decision chain. To address this challenge, we propose Reflection-Guided Policy Optimization (ReflectPO), a reinforcement learning framework for autonomous error recovery in long-horizon tasks. ReflectPO comprises two core components. The first is Reflection-Guided Sampling. We use branch differences and repeated visits in interaction trajectories to construct hints for error recovery. The second is Tree-Structured Credit Assignment. We organize sampled trajectories into trees and assign action-level credit using parent--child reward differences and recovery gains. Experiments over two long-horizon tool-use benchmarks show that ReflectPO outperforms multiple existing baselines in most domains. It also achieves the best overall performance on average. Further analyses show that ReflectPO effectively improves agents' ability to recognize their own deviations, recover from erroneous states, and continue making progress toward task completion.
These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.
None explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"With external tools, large language models (LLMs) can tackle complex tasks through sustained environmental interaction."
None explicit
Validate eval design from full paper text.
"With external tools, large language models (LLMs) can tackle complex tasks through sustained environmental interaction."
Not reported
No explicit QC controls found.
"With external tools, large language models (LLMs) can tackle complex tasks through sustained environmental interaction."
Not extracted
No benchmark anchors detected.
"With external tools, large language models (LLMs) can tackle complex tasks through sustained environmental interaction."
Not extracted
No metric anchors detected.
"With external tools, large language models (LLMs) can tackle complex tasks through sustained environmental interaction."
No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.
No metric terms were extracted from the available abstract.
With external tools, large language models (LLMs) can tackle complex tasks through sustained environmental interaction.
Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.
Human feedback protocol is explicit
No explicit human feedback protocol detected.
Evaluation mode is explicit
No clear evaluation mode extracted.
Quality control reporting appears
No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.
Benchmark or dataset anchors are present
No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.
Metric reporting is present
No metric terms extracted.