Human Feedback Types
missingNone explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"Deep research with Large Language Model (LLM) agents is emerging as a powerful paradigm for multi-step information discovery, synthesis, and analysis."
HFEPX · Eval paper review
Shicheng Liu, Yucheng Jiang, Sajid Farook, Camila Nicollier Sanchez +2 more
Published
Apr 7, 2026
Citations
0
Trust level
Moderate
Usefulness score
27/100 (Low)
Extraction confidence
55% (Moderate)
Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.
Rater population
Not reported
Signals refreshed
Apr 7, 2026
This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.
Use this for comparison and orientation, not as your only source.
Best use
Background context only
Use if you need
A benchmark-and-metrics comparison anchor.
What to verify
Validate the evaluation procedure and quality controls in the full paper before operational use.
Main weakness
No major weakness surfaced.
Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.
If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here
Deep research with Large Language Model (LLM) agents is emerging as a powerful paradigm for multi-step information discovery, synthesis, and analysis. However, existing approaches primarily focus on unstructured web data, while the challenges of conducting deep research over large-scale structured databases remain relatively underexplored. Unlike web-based research, effective data-centric research requires more than retrieval and summarization and demands iterative hypothesis generation, quantitative reasoning over structured schemas, and convergence toward a coherent analytical narrative. In this paper, we present DataSTORM, an LLM-based agentic system capable of autonomously conducting research across both large-scale structured databases and internet sources. Grounded in principles from Exploratory Data Analysis and Data Storytelling, DataSTORM reframes deep research over structured data as a thesis-driven analytical process: discovering candidate theses from data, validating them through iterative cross-source investigation, and developing them into coherent analytical narratives. We evaluate DataSTORM on InsightBench, where it achieves a new state-of-the-art result with a 19.4% relative improvement in insight-level recall and 7.2% in summary-level score. We further introduce a new dataset built on ACLED, a real-world complex database, and demonstrate that DataSTORM outperforms proprietary systems such as ChatGPT Deep Research across both automated metrics and human evaluations.
These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.
None explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"Deep research with Large Language Model (LLM) agents is emerging as a powerful paradigm for multi-step information discovery, synthesis, and analysis."
Human Eval
Includes extracted eval setup.
"Deep research with Large Language Model (LLM) agents is emerging as a powerful paradigm for multi-step information discovery, synthesis, and analysis."
Not reported
No explicit QC controls found.
"Deep research with Large Language Model (LLM) agents is emerging as a powerful paradigm for multi-step information discovery, synthesis, and analysis."
Insightbench
Useful for quick benchmark comparison.
"We evaluate DataSTORM on InsightBench, where it achieves a new state-of-the-art result with a 19.4% relative improvement in insight-level recall and 7.2% in summary-level score."
Recall
Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.
"We evaluate DataSTORM on InsightBench, where it achieves a new state-of-the-art result with a 19.4% relative improvement in insight-level recall and 7.2% in summary-level score."
Deep research with Large Language Model (LLM) agents is emerging as a powerful paradigm for multi-step information discovery, synthesis, and analysis.
Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.
Human feedback protocol is explicit
No explicit human feedback protocol detected.
Evaluation mode is explicit
Detected: Human Eval
Quality control reporting appears
No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.
Benchmark or dataset anchors are present
Detected: Insightbench
Metric reporting is present
Detected: recall