Skip to content
← Back to explorer

DataSTORM: Deep Research on Large-Scale Databases using Exploratory Data Analysis and Data Storytelling

Shicheng Liu, Yucheng Jiang, Sajid Farook, Camila Nicollier Sanchez, David Fernando Castro Pena, Monica S. Lam · Apr 7, 2026 · Citations: 0

How to use this page

Moderate trust

Use this for comparison and orientation, not as your only source.

Best use

Background context only

What to verify

Validate the evaluation procedure and quality controls in the full paper before operational use.

Evidence quality

Moderate

Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.

Abstract

Deep research with Large Language Model (LLM) agents is emerging as a powerful paradigm for multi-step information discovery, synthesis, and analysis. However, existing approaches primarily focus on unstructured web data, while the challenges of conducting deep research over large-scale structured databases remain relatively underexplored. Unlike web-based research, effective data-centric research requires more than retrieval and summarization and demands iterative hypothesis generation, quantitative reasoning over structured schemas, and convergence toward a coherent analytical narrative. In this paper, we present DataSTORM, an LLM-based agentic system capable of autonomously conducting research across both large-scale structured databases and internet sources. Grounded in principles from Exploratory Data Analysis and Data Storytelling, DataSTORM reframes deep research over structured data as a thesis-driven analytical process: discovering candidate theses from data, validating them through iterative cross-source investigation, and developing them into coherent analytical narratives. We evaluate DataSTORM on InsightBench, where it achieves a new state-of-the-art result with a 19.4% relative improvement in insight-level recall and 7.2% in summary-level score. We further introduce a new dataset built on ACLED, a real-world complex database, and demonstrate that DataSTORM outperforms proprietary systems such as ChatGPT Deep Research across both automated metrics and human evaluations.

Should You Rely On This Paper?

This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A benchmark-and-metrics comparison anchor.

Main weakness

No major weakness surfaced.

Trust level

Moderate

Usefulness score

27/100 • Low

Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Detected

Usefulness for eval research

Adjacent candidate

Extraction confidence 55%

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

missing

None explicit

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

"Deep research with Large Language Model (LLM) agents is emerging as a powerful paradigm for multi-step information discovery, synthesis, and analysis."

Evaluation Modes

strong

Human Eval

Includes extracted eval setup.

"Deep research with Large Language Model (LLM) agents is emerging as a powerful paradigm for multi-step information discovery, synthesis, and analysis."

Quality Controls

missing

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"Deep research with Large Language Model (LLM) agents is emerging as a powerful paradigm for multi-step information discovery, synthesis, and analysis."

Benchmarks / Datasets

strong

Insightbench

Useful for quick benchmark comparison.

"We evaluate DataSTORM on InsightBench, where it achieves a new state-of-the-art result with a 19.4% relative improvement in insight-level recall and 7.2% in summary-level score."

Reported Metrics

strong

Recall

Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.

"We evaluate DataSTORM on InsightBench, where it achieves a new state-of-the-art result with a 19.4% relative improvement in insight-level recall and 7.2% in summary-level score."

Human Feedback Details

  • Uses human feedback: No
  • Feedback types: None
  • Rater population: Not reported
  • Expertise required: General

Evaluation Details

  • Evaluation modes: Human Eval
  • Agentic eval: Long Horizon
  • Quality controls: Not reported
  • Evidence quality: Moderate
  • Use this page as: Background context only

Protocol And Measurement Signals

Benchmarks / Datasets

Insightbench

Reported Metrics

recall

Research Brief

Metadata summary

Deep research with Large Language Model (LLM) agents is emerging as a powerful paradigm for multi-step information discovery, synthesis, and analysis.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • Deep research with Large Language Model (LLM) agents is emerging as a powerful paradigm for multi-step information discovery, synthesis, and analysis.
  • However, existing approaches primarily focus on unstructured web data, while the challenges of conducting deep research over large-scale structured databases remain relatively underexplored.
  • Unlike web-based research, effective data-centric research requires more than retrieval and summarization and demands iterative hypothesis generation, quantitative reasoning over structured schemas, and convergence toward a coherent analytical narrative.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Validate inferred eval signals (Human evaluation, Long-horizon tasks) against the full paper.
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended Queries

Research Summary

Contribution Summary

  • Deep research with Large Language Model (LLM) agents is emerging as a powerful paradigm for multi-step information discovery, synthesis, and analysis.
  • In this paper, we present DataSTORM, an LLM-based agentic system capable of autonomously conducting research across both large-scale structured databases and internet sources.
  • We evaluate DataSTORM on InsightBench, where it achieves a new state-of-the-art result with a 19.4% relative improvement in insight-level recall and 7.2% in summary-level score.

Why It Matters For Eval

  • Deep research with Large Language Model (LLM) agents is emerging as a powerful paradigm for multi-step information discovery, synthesis, and analysis.
  • In this paper, we present DataSTORM, an LLM-based agentic system capable of autonomously conducting research across both large-scale structured databases and internet sources.

Researcher Checklist

  • Gap: Human feedback protocol is explicit

    No explicit human feedback protocol detected.

  • Pass: Evaluation mode is explicit

    Detected: Human Eval

  • Gap: Quality control reporting appears

    No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.

  • Pass: Benchmark or dataset anchors are present

    Detected: Insightbench

  • Pass: Metric reporting is present

    Detected: recall

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

Get Started

Join the #1 Platform for AI Training Talent

Where top AI builders and expert AI Trainers connect to build the future of AI.
Self-Service
Post a Job
Post your project and get a shortlist of qualified AI Trainers and Data Labelers. Hire and manage your team in the tools you already use.
Managed Service
For Large Projects
Done-for-You
We recruit, onboard, and manage a dedicated team inside your tools. End-to-end operations for large or complex projects.
For Freelancers
Join as an AI Trainer
Find AI training and data labeling projects across platforms, all in one place. One profile, one application process, more opportunities.