Human Feedback Types
missingNone explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"We present Fikiria, a two-stage SFT+GRPO recipe for Swahili mathematical reasoning."
HFEPX · Eval paper review
Jessica Lundin, Katherine Rosenfeld, David Adelani, Geoffrey Mosoti Nyakiongora +4 more
Published
Nov 11, 2026
Citations
0
Trust level
Moderate
Usefulness score
37/100 (Low)
Extraction confidence
55% (Moderate)
Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.
Rater population
Not reported
Signals refreshed
Nov 11, 2026
This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.
Use this for comparison and orientation, not as your only source.
Best use
Background context only
Use if you need
A benchmark-and-metrics comparison anchor.
What to verify
Validate the evaluation procedure and quality controls in the full paper before operational use.
Main weakness
No major weakness surfaced.
Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.
If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here
We present Fikiria, a two-stage SFT+GRPO recipe for Swahili mathematical reasoning. Its reward multiplies a format gate by a weighted sum of answer accuracy and the ChrF\texttt{++} similarity of the Swahili reasoning to an in-language reference chain of thought, so that training targets the surface fidelity of the reasoning trace and not only the final answer. We train on a 2.3k-problem Swahili dataset created by translating GSM8K with GPT-4.1 and filtering with SSA-COMET. On AfriMGSM Swahili, Fikiria-AfriqueQwen-14B reaches 79.2\%. Under the same fixed prompt and strict answer-format scoring, GPT-4o reaches 68.0\%, partly because it often fails the required answer format; IrokoBench reports 78.8\% for GPT-4o using a best-per-model prompt, a figure numerically close to ours but not directly comparable. In a small human evaluation with co-author annotators, GPT-4o's outputs were preferred overall. ChrF\texttt{++} measures surface fidelity, not the validity of individual reasoning steps.
These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.
None explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"We present Fikiria, a two-stage SFT+GRPO recipe for Swahili mathematical reasoning."
Human Eval, Automatic Metrics
Includes extracted eval setup.
"We present Fikiria, a two-stage SFT+GRPO recipe for Swahili mathematical reasoning."
Not reported
No explicit QC controls found.
"We present Fikiria, a two-stage SFT+GRPO recipe for Swahili mathematical reasoning."
GSM8K
Useful for quick benchmark comparison.
"We train on a 2.3k-problem Swahili dataset created by translating GSM8K with GPT-4.1 and filtering with SSA-COMET."
Accuracy
Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.
"Its reward multiplies a format gate by a weighted sum of answer accuracy and the ChrF\texttt{++} similarity of the Swahili reasoning to an in-language reference chain of thought, so that training targets the surface fidelity of the reasoning trace and not only the final answer."
We present Fikiria, a two-stage SFT+GRPO recipe for Swahili mathematical reasoning.
Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.
Human feedback protocol is explicit
No explicit human feedback protocol detected.
Evaluation mode is explicit
Detected: Human Eval, Automatic Metrics
Quality control reporting appears
No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.
Benchmark or dataset anchors are present
Detected: GSM8K
Metric reporting is present
Detected: accuracy