Human Feedback Types
strongRubric Rating
Directly usable for protocol triage.
"Deep research agents synthesize open-web evidence into long reports, but current benchmarks do not evaluate research centered on a source video."
HFEPX · Eval paper review
Jiahao Meng, Qize Yang, Yuxuan Wang, Yunfei Chu +3 more
Published
Oct 22, 2026
Citations
0
Trust level
Moderate
Usefulness score
65/100 (Medium)
Extraction confidence
65% (Moderate)
Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.
Rater population
Not reported
Signals refreshed
Oct 22, 2026
This paper has useful evaluation signal, but protocol completeness is partial; pair it with related papers before deciding implementation strategy.
Use this for comparison and orientation, not as your only source.
Use this page for context, then validate protocol choices against stronger HFEPX references before implementation decisions.
Best use
Secondary protocol comparison source
Use if you need
A concrete protocol example with enough signal to inform rater workflow design.
What to verify
Validate the exact study setup in the full paper before operational use.
Main weakness
The abstract does not clearly describe the evaluation setup.
Useful as a secondary reference; validate protocol details against neighboring papers.
If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here
Deep research agents synthesize open-web evidence into long reports, but current benchmarks do not evaluate research centered on a source video. We introduce Video-Centered Deep Research Report Generation. Given a video and user request, an agent identifies research questions, retrieves external multimodal evidence, and produces an interactive report linked to relevant video moments. This task has direct practical value because it helps users locate relevant moments, verify claims, reproduce demonstrated procedures, and make informed decisions from video content. We present a skill-based workflow and OmniDR-Bench for this task. For evaluation, we propose Omni Atomic Rubric Trees (Omni-ARTs). Each tree contains three dimensions, 23 shared directions, and task-specific atomic binary criteria. The directions test audiovisual grounding, multimodal evidence use, and interactive presentation. Audited Rubric Construction (ARC) builds these trees through independent evidence collection, automated checks, behavioral calibration, and iterative human review. OmniDR-Bench contains 50 Chinese and English tasks across 19 realworld subcategories. It includes 6,414 criteria. Across 18 agent configurations, the best system scores 63.3 out of 100. Current agents still need broader content coverage, stronger causal and logical analysis across modalities, and more accurate citation support. We further analyze models, harnesses, skill configurations, video categories, and research trajectories. The code and data are released at https://github.com/marinero4972/OmniDR-Bench.
These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.
Rubric Rating
Directly usable for protocol triage.
"Deep research agents synthesize open-web evidence into long reports, but current benchmarks do not evaluate research centered on a source video."
None explicit
Validate eval design from full paper text.
"Deep research agents synthesize open-web evidence into long reports, but current benchmarks do not evaluate research centered on a source video."
Calibration
Calibration/adjudication style controls detected.
"Audited Rubric Construction (ARC) builds these trees through independent evidence collection, automated checks, behavioral calibration, and iterative human review."
Omnidr Bench
Useful for quick benchmark comparison.
"We present a skill-based workflow and OmniDR-Bench for this task."
Not extracted
No metric anchors detected.
"Deep research agents synthesize open-web evidence into long reports, but current benchmarks do not evaluate research centered on a source video."
No metric terms were extracted from the available abstract.
Deep research agents synthesize open-web evidence into long reports, but current benchmarks do not evaluate research centered on a source video.
Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.
Human feedback protocol is explicit
Detected: Rubric Rating
Evaluation mode is explicit
No clear evaluation mode extracted.
Quality control reporting appears
Detected: Calibration
Benchmark or dataset anchors are present
Detected: Omnidr-Bench
Metric reporting is present
No metric terms extracted.