Skip to content
← Back to explorer

HFEPX Hub

Long Horizon + Coding (Last 30 Days)

Updated from current HFEPX corpus (Apr 17, 2026). 12 papers are grouped in this hub page.

Read Full Context

Updated from current HFEPX corpus (Apr 17, 2026). 12 papers are grouped in this hub page. Common evaluation modes: Automatic Metrics, Simulation Env. Most common rater population: Domain Experts. Common annotation unit: Trajectory. Frequently cited benchmark: BFCL. Common metric signal: accuracy. Use this page to compare protocol setup, judge behavior, and labeling design decisions before running new eval experiments. Newest paper in this set is from Apr 1, 2026.

Papers: 12 Last published: Apr 1, 2026 Global RSS Tag RSS
Long HorizonCodingLast 30d

Researcher Quick Triage

This hub is best used for protocol triage and replication planning from abstract-level evidence. Quality band: Developing .

High-Signal Coverage

100.0%

12 / 12 sampled papers are not low-signal flagged.

Replication-Ready Set

3

Benchmark + metric + eval mode explicitly present.

Judge/Human Comparability

0

Papers containing both `human_eval` and `llm_as_judge`.

  • 3 papers are replication-ready (benchmark + metric + explicit evaluation mode).
  • 0 papers support judge-vs-human agreement analysis.
  • 0 papers report explicit quality controls (calibration/adjudication/IAA).

Primary action: Start with the top 2 papers in “Start Here”, then validate assumptions in the protocol matrix.

Need evaluators for this research workflow?

Post a Job →

Why This Matters For Eval Research

  • 16.7% of papers report explicit human-feedback signals, led by critique/edit feedback.
  • automatic metrics appears in 83.3% of papers in this hub.
  • BFCL is a recurring benchmark anchor for cross-paper comparisons in this page.

Protocol Takeaways

  • Quality-control reporting is sparse in this slice; prioritize papers with explicit calibration or adjudication steps.
  • Rater context is mostly domain experts, and annotation is commonly trajectory-level annotation; use this to scope replication staffing.
  • Stratify by benchmark (BFCL vs GSM8K) before comparing methods.

Benchmark Interpretation

  • BFCL appears in 8.3% of hub papers (1/12); use this cohort for benchmark-matched comparisons.
  • GSM8K appears in 8.3% of hub papers (1/12); use this cohort for benchmark-matched comparisons.

Metric Interpretation

  • accuracy is reported in 41.7% of hub papers (5/12); compare with a secondary metric before ranking methods.
  • cost is reported in 25% of hub papers (3/12); compare with a secondary metric before ranking methods.
Researcher Checklist (Expanded)

Researcher Checklist

  • Gap: Papers with explicit human feedback

    Coverage is a replication risk (16.7% vs 45% target).

  • Gap: Papers reporting quality controls

    Coverage is a replication risk (0% vs 30% target).

  • Moderate: Papers naming benchmarks/datasets

    Coverage is usable but incomplete (33.3% vs 35% target).

  • Strong: Papers naming evaluation metrics

    Coverage is strong (83.3% vs 35% target).

  • Gap: Papers with known rater population

    Coverage is a replication risk (8.3% vs 35% target).

  • Moderate: Papers with known annotation unit

    Coverage is usable but incomplete (33.3% vs 35% target).

Strengths

  • Agentic evaluation appears in 100% of papers.

Known Gaps

  • Only 0% of papers report quality controls; prioritize calibration/adjudication evidence.
  • Rater population is under-specified (8.3% coverage).

Suggested Next Analyses

  • Stratify by benchmark (BFCL vs GSM8K) before comparing methods.
  • Track metric sensitivity by reporting both accuracy and cost.
Recommended Queries (Expanded)

Recommended Queries

Start with These 3

Use these when you need one protocol anchor, one benchmark anchor, and one recent comparison point before reading the wider hub.

Start Here (Best First 6)

Ranked for protocol completeness (human signal, benchmark + metric anchors, quality controls, and judge/human overlap).

Protocol Matrix (Top 12)

Use this to quickly compare protocol ingredients instead of scanning long prose.

Paper HF Signal Eval Modes Benchmarks Metrics QC
When Users Change Their Mind: Evaluating Interruptible Agents in Long-Horizon Web Navigation

Apr 1, 2026

Yes Simulation Env WebArena , Interruptbench Not Reported Not Reported
S0 Tuning: Zero-Overhead Adaptation of Hybrid Recurrent-Attention Models

Apr 1, 2026

No
Not Reported
Automatic Metrics MATH 500 , GSM8K Pass@1 , Inference cost Not Reported
SkillX: Automatically Constructing Skill Knowledge Bases for Agents

Apr 6, 2026

No
Not Reported
Automatic Metrics BFCL Task success Not Reported
Effective Strategies for Asynchronous Software Engineering Agents

Mar 23, 2026

No
Not Reported
Automatic Metrics Paperbench Accuracy Not Reported
The Ultimate Tutorial for AI-driven Scale Development in Generative Psychometrics: Releasing AIGENIE from its Bottle

Mar 30, 2026

Yes Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported
Scaling Reasoning Tokens via RL and Parallel Thinking: Evidence From Competitive Programming

Apr 1, 2026

No
Not Reported
Automatic Metrics Not Reported Accuracy , Pass@1 Not Reported
TRIMS: Trajectory-Ranked Instruction Masked Supervision for Diffusion Language Models

Apr 1, 2026

No
Not Reported
Automatic Metrics Not Reported Accuracy Not Reported
The Evolution of Tool Use in LLM Agents: From Single-Tool Call to Multi-Tool Orchestration

Mar 24, 2026

No
Not Reported
Automatic Metrics Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported
AgentGL: Towards Agentic Graph Learning with LLMs via Reinforcement Learning

Apr 7, 2026

No
Not Reported
Automatic Metrics Not Reported Accuracy Not Reported
Oblivion: Self-Adaptive Agentic Memory Control through Decay-Driven Activation

Mar 31, 2026

No
Not Reported
Automatic Metrics Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported
Hierarchical Chain-of-Thought Prompting: Enhancing LLM Reasoning Performance and Efficiency

Mar 31, 2026

No
Not Reported
Automatic Metrics Not Reported Accuracy , Coherence Not Reported
Mi:dm K 2.5 Pro

Mar 19, 2026

No
Not Reported
Automatic Metrics Not Reported Harmlessness Not Reported

Protocol Diff (Top Papers)

Fast side-by-side comparison for the highest-ranked papers in this hub.

Signal When Users Change Their Mind: Evaluating Interrupti… S0 Tuning: Zero-Overhead Adaptation of Hybrid Recur… SkillX: Automatically Constructing Skill Knowledge…
Human Feedback Critique EditNot reportedNot reported
Evaluation Modes Simulation EnvAutomatic MetricsAutomatic Metrics
Benchmarks WebArena, InterruptbenchMATH 500, GSM8KBFCL
Metrics Not reportedPass@1, Inference costTask success
Quality Controls Not reportedNot reportedNot reported
Rater Population UnknownUnknownUnknown
Annotation Unit UnknownTrajectoryUnknown
Suggested Reading Order (Extended)

This section is intentionally expanded only when needed; use “Start Here” above for a faster pass.

Suggested Reading Order

  1. AgentGL: Towards Agentic Graph Learning with LLMs via Reinforcement Learning

    Start here for detailed protocol reporting and quality-control evidence. Signals: automatic metrics. Focus: accuracy. Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly rely on agentic capabilities-iterative retrieval, tool use, and.

  2. SkillX: Automatically Constructing Skill Knowledge Bases for Agents

    Start here for detailed protocol reporting and quality-control evidence. Signals: automatic metrics. Focus: BFCL / task success. Abstract: Learning from experience is critical for building capable large language.

  3. Scaling Reasoning Tokens via RL and Parallel Thinking: Evidence From Competitive Programming

    Start here for detailed protocol reporting and quality-control evidence. Signals: automatic metrics. Focus: accuracy. Abstract: We study how to scale reasoning token budgets for competitive programming through two.

  4. When Users Change Their Mind: Evaluating Interruptible Agents in Long-Horizon Web Navigation

    Include a human-eval paper to calibrate against judge-based evaluation settings. Signals: simulation environments + critique/edit feedback. Focus: WebArena. Abstract: As LLM agents transition from short, static problem solving.

  5. The Ultimate Tutorial for AI-driven Scale Development in Generative Psychometrics: Releasing AIGENIE from its Bottle

    Include a human-eval paper to calibrate against judge-based evaluation settings. Signals: critique/edit feedback. Abstract: Psychological scale development has traditionally required extensive expert involvement, iterative revision, and large-scale pilot.

  6. S0 Tuning: Zero-Overhead Adaptation of Hybrid Recurrent-Attention Models

    Adds automatic metrics for broader protocol coverage within this hub. Signals: automatic metrics. Focus: MATH-500 / pass@1. Abstract: Using roughly 48 execution-verified HumanEval training solutions, tuning a single.

  7. Effective Strategies for Asynchronous Software Engineering Agents

    Adds automatic metrics for broader protocol coverage within this hub. Signals: automatic metrics. Focus: Paperbench / accuracy. Abstract: AI agents have become increasingly capable at isolated software engineering.

  8. TRIMS: Trajectory-Ranked Instruction Masked Supervision for Diffusion Language Models

    Adds automatic metrics for broader protocol coverage within this hub. Signals: automatic metrics. Focus: accuracy. Abstract: Diffusion language models (DLMs) offer a promising path toward low-latency generation through.

Known Limitations

Known Limitations

  • Only 0% of papers report quality controls; prioritize calibration/adjudication evidence.
  • Rater population is under-specified (8.3% coverage).
  • Narrative synthesis is grounded in metadata and abstracts only; full-paper implementation details are not parsed.
Research Utility Snapshot (Detailed)

Research Utility Snapshot

Human Feedback Mix

  • Critique Edit (2)

Evaluation Modes

  • Automatic Metrics (10)
  • Simulation Env (1)

Top Benchmarks

  • BFCL (1)
  • GSM8K (1)
  • HumanEval+ (1)
  • Interruptbench (1)

Top Metrics

  • Accuracy (5)
  • Cost (3)
  • Latency (2)
  • Pass@1 (2)

Rater Population Mix

  • Domain Experts (1)

Quality Controls

Coverage diagnostics (sample-based): human-feedback 16.7% · benchmarks 33.3% · metrics 83.3% · quality controls 0.0%.

Top Papers

  • When Users Change Their Mind: Evaluating Interruptible Agents in Long-Horizon Web Navigation

    Henry Peng Zou, Chunyu Miao, Wei-Chieh Huang, Yankai Chen, Yue Zhou · Apr 1, 2026 · Citations: 0

    Critique Edit Simulation Env Long Horizon

    As LLM agents transition from short, static problem solving to executing complex, long-horizon tasks in dynamic environments, the ability to handle user interruptions, such as adding requirement or revising goals, during mid-task execution…

  • The Ultimate Tutorial for AI-driven Scale Development in Generative Psychometrics: Releasing AIGENIE from its Bottle

    Lara Russell-Lasalandra, Hudson Golino, Luis Eduardo Garrido, Alexander P. Christensen · Mar 30, 2026 · Citations: 0

    Critique Edit Tool Use

    Psychological scale development has traditionally required extensive expert involvement, iterative revision, and large-scale pilot testing before psychometric evaluation can begin.

  • S0 Tuning: Zero-Overhead Adaptation of Hybrid Recurrent-Attention Models

    Jack Young · Apr 1, 2026 · Citations: 0

    Automatic Metrics Long Horizon

    Using roughly 48 execution-verified HumanEval training solutions, tuning a single initial state matrix per recurrent layer, with zero inference overhead, outperforms LoRA by +10.8 pp (p < 0.001) on HumanEval.

  • SkillX: Automatically Constructing Skill Knowledge Bases for Agents

    Chenxi Wang, Zhuoyun Yu, Xin Xie, Wuguannan Yao, Runnan Fang · Apr 6, 2026 · Citations: 0

    Automatic Metrics Long Horizon

    Learning from experience is critical for building capable large language model (LLM) agents, yet prevailing self-evolving paradigms remain inefficient: agents learn in isolation, repeatedly rediscover similar behaviors from limited…

  • Effective Strategies for Asynchronous Software Engineering Agents

    Jiayi Geng, Graham Neubig · Mar 23, 2026 · Citations: 0

    Automatic Metrics Long Horizon

    Inspired by these collaboration primitives, we introduce Centralized Asynchronous Isolated Delegation (CAID), a structured multi-agent coordination paradigm grounded in three core SWE primitives: centralized task delegation, asynchronous…

  • Scaling Reasoning Tokens via RL and Parallel Thinking: Evidence From Competitive Programming

    Qianfan Zhang, Tianyu Guo, Xuandi Ren, Jiale Chen, Ming Ding · Apr 1, 2026 · Citations: 0

    Automatic Metrics Long Horizon

    During RL training, we observe an approximately log-linear relationship between validation accuracy and the average number of generated reasoning tokens over successive checkpoints, and show two ways to shift this training trajectory:…

  • TRIMS: Trajectory-Ranked Instruction Masked Supervision for Diffusion Language Models

    Lingjie Chen, Ruizhong Qiu, Yuyu Fan, Yanjun Zhao, Hanghang Tong · Apr 1, 2026 · Citations: 0

    Automatic Metrics Long Horizon

    Experiments on LLaDA and Dream across math and coding benchmarks show that TRIMS significantly improves the accuracy-parallelism trade-off over both standard MDLM training and train-free acceleration baselines, while achieving competitive…

  • The Evolution of Tool Use in LLM Agents: From Single-Tool Call to Multi-Tool Orchestration

    Haoyuan Xu, Chang Li, Xinyan Ma, Xianhao Ou, Zihan Zhang · Mar 24, 2026 · Citations: 0

    Automatic Metrics Tool Use

    As agent systems evolve, however, the central problem has shifted from isolated invocation to multi-tool orchestration over long trajectories with intermediate state, execution feedback, changing environments, and practical constraints such…

  • AgentGL: Towards Agentic Graph Learning with LLMs via Reinforcement Learning

    Yuanfu Sun, Kang Li, Dongzhe Fan, Jiajin Liu, Qiaoyu Tan · Apr 7, 2026 · Citations: 0

    Automatic Metrics Tool Use

    To bridge this gap, we introduce Agentic Graph Learning (AGL), a paradigm that reframes graph learning as an interleaved process of topology-aware navigation and LLM-based inference.

  • Oblivion: Self-Adaptive Agentic Memory Control through Decay-Driven Activation

    Ashish Rana, Chia-Chien Hung, Qumeng Sun, Julian Martin Kunkel, Carolin Lawrence · Mar 31, 2026 · Citations: 0

    Automatic Metrics Long Horizon

    Human memory adapts through selective forgetting: experiences become less accessible over time but can be reactivated by reinforcement or contextual cues.

  • Hierarchical Chain-of-Thought Prompting: Enhancing LLM Reasoning Performance and Efficiency

    Xingshuai Huang, Derek Li, Bahareh Nikpour, Parsa Omidi · Mar 31, 2026 · Citations: 0

    Automatic Metrics Long Horizon

    Extensive evaluations across diverse LLMs and mathematical reasoning benchmarks show that Hi-CoT consistently improves average accuracy by 6.2% (up to 61.4% on certain models and tasks) while reducing reasoning trace length by 13.9%…

  • Mi:dm K 2.5 Pro

    KT Tech innovation Group · Mar 19, 2026 · Citations: 0

    Automatic Metrics Long Horizon

    The evolving LLM landscape requires capabilities beyond simple text generation, prioritizing multi-step reasoning, long-context understanding, and agentic workflows.

Related Hubs

Get Started

Join the #1 Platform for AI Training Talent

Where top AI builders and expert AI Trainers connect to build the future of AI.
Self-Service
Post a Job
Post your project and get a shortlist of qualified AI Trainers and Data Labelers. Hire and manage your team in the tools you already use.
Managed Service
For Large Projects
Done-for-You
We recruit, onboard, and manage a dedicated team inside your tools. End-to-end operations for large or complex projects.
For Freelancers
Join as an AI Trainer
Find AI training and data labeling projects across platforms, all in one place. One profile, one application process, more opportunities.