Write Once, Check Many: Reusable Ledgers for Post-Hoc Policy Compliance Auditing of Agent Trajectories
Abstract
Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
Auditing LLM agents against policies is critical to ensure safety but requires rereading long trajectories once per policy. Can we instead record each trajectory once and reuse that record for policies not known in advance? We propose write once, check many, a framework in which a writer model converts each agent trajectory into a policy-independent ledger of the agent's actions and outcomes. A reader then checks each new policy against the ledger alone, without access to the original trajectory. On 900 trajectories from SHADE-Arena, $τ$-bench, and $τ^2$-bench, we show that a 12B reader of narrative ledgers can either match or in fact achieve higher AUC than the same 12B model reading full trajectories. On SHADE-Arena policies that combine several facts, our approach outperforms a 31B model reading the trajectory (.777 vs. .713 AUC). When checking eight SHADE-Arena policies separately, ledgers use about $5\times$ fewer tokens, including the cost of writing them. A deeper analysis shows that rule-based extraction performs better on some single-action policies, and ledgers can miss evidence in long tool outputs and message contents. Our results suggest that reusable, policy-independent records can make retrospective agent auditing more efficient and effective, and highlight important considerations in ledger design.
Results and benchmarks
Auditing LLM agents against policies is critical to ensure safety but requires rereading long trajectories once per policy.
Benchmark evidence is limited
Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.
Utility signals: depth 65/100, grounding 75/100, status medium.
Implementation
No direct implementation yet
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.
No verified maintained repo yet
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No maintained paper-verified implementation was found; start with the closest related repositories below.
- Compare repo methods against the paper equations/algorithm before trusting metrics.
- Create a minimal baseline implementation from the paper and use adjacent repos as references.
Time to first repro: a few days
wuyoscar/AISafetyHot-Hub is the closest maintained adjacent implementation (Matched via arXiv identifier search). It is not paper-verified; validate algorithm and evaluation setup against the paper before trusting reported metrics. Community adoption signal: 1658 GitHub stars.
- Adjacent implementations are not paper-verified
- Recommended repository is adjacent and not paper-verified.
- Adjacent implementation match confidence is low.
Reproduction readiness
No repo
No verified implementation available
- No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Validation caveat
Repositories and ecosystem
Closest related implementations
These are not paper-verified. Use them as reference points when no direct implementation is available.
- wuyoscar/AISafetyHot-Hub Adjacent · Confidence: Low · 1,658 stars
Matched via arXiv identifier search
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
- ashwin-333/reusable-ledgers
Confidence: Medium · 0 stars
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Datasets
Spaces
Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Research context
Tasks
Agentic tool use
Methods
Transformer
Domains
Large Language Models, AI Agents
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.