Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Toward Autonomous RTL and Synthesis Optimization: Benchmarking and Self-Improving Agents

Wenji Fang, Yao Lu, Jinghua Wang, Zhiyao XiePublished Nov 10, 2026
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Context only
Use as context only
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
2
Review before use

Abstract

Domain fit: AI-core · Core AI workload signals detected from paper context and implementation/artifact evidence.

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) and autonomous agents are creating new opportunities for hardware design optimization. This paper examines three connected directions toward autonomous RTL and synthesis optimization: (1) Realistic benchmarking. We discuss reference-based and open-ended RTL optimization benchmarks that evaluate optimization opportunities under realistic EDA workflows. (2) Tool-grounded RTL optimization. We present Dr. RTL, a multi-agent framework that automates critical-path analysis, RTL rewriting, and implementation-level evaluation, while continuously improving through reusable optimization skills. Evaluated on 20 real-world RTL designs, Dr.~RTL achieves average WNS/TNS improvements of 21\%/17\% with a 6\% area reduction over commercial synthesis. (3) Design-specific synthesis optimization. We explore agent-driven synthesis script tuning and the discovery of executable synthesis algorithms across intermediate representations, technology-independent optimization, and technology mapping. Finally, we envision AI-native design automation that jointly explores architectural, RTL, and EDA algorithm design spaces, guided by verification constraints and implementation feedback.

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: hot
Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) and autonomous agents are creating new opportunities for hardware design optimization.

Implementation

No direct implementation yet

Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.

Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.

Implementation evidence summary
Confidence: low

Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.

Reproduction risks
  • Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Nov 12, 2026

No repo

No verified implementation available

  • No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

Tasks

Agentic tool use

Methods

Transformer

Domains

Natural Language Processing, AI Agents

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.