Policy and World Modeling Co-Training for Language Agents
Ning Lu, Baijiong Lin, Shengcai Liu, Jiahao Wu, Haoze Lv, Yanbin Wei, Lingting Zhu, Shengju Qian, Xin Wang, Ying-Cong Chen, Qi Wang, Ke Tang
Core AI workload signals detected from paper context and implementation/artifact evidence.
Reinforcement learning (RL) improves large language model (LLM) agents by teaching them which actions lead to high rewards, but provides little supervision on what those actions do to the environment. World modeling (WM) can fill this gap, yet existing approaches often require separate simulators, extra training stages, or additional inference-time computation. We observe that on-policy RL rollouts already contain th ...
e needed signal: each transition pairs an action with its resulting next observation. Based on this observation, we propose PaW, a Policy and World modeling co-training framework that adds auxiliary WM supervision to the same policy during RL, without changing the inference paradigm. To make auxiliary WM supervision informative and stable, PaW introduces three components: action-entropy-based WM data selection, noise-tolerant WM loss, and reward-adaptive loss balancing. Experiments on three agentic task benchmarks show consistent improvements over strong RL baselines across models and RL algorithms. These results suggest that standard RL rollouts are a practical source of WM supervision for language-agent training.
Results & Benchmarks
No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.
Reinforcement learning (RL) improves large language model (LLM) agents by teaching them which actions lead to high rewards, but provides little supervision on what those actions do to the environment.
Implementation Evidence Summary
leggedrobotics/robotic_world_model is the closest maintained adjacent implementation (Matches contextual method/domain keyword: reinforcement learning). It is not paper-verified; validate algorithm and evaluation setup against the paper before trusting reported metrics. Community adoption signal: 649 GitHub stars.
Reproduction Risks
- Adjacent implementations are not paper-verified
- Recommended repository is adjacent and not paper-verified.
- Adjacent implementation match confidence is low.
Hardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence disclosure
Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.
Utility signals: depth 65/100, grounding 75/100, status medium.
Implementation Status
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No maintained paper-verified implementation was found; start with the closest related repositories below.
- Compare repo methods against the paper equations/algorithm before trusting metrics.
- Create a minimal baseline implementation from the paper and use adjacent repos as references.
Reproduction readiness
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
No verified implementation available
- · No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.
Closest related implementations
These are not paper-verified. Use them as reference points when no direct implementation is available.
- leggedrobotics/robotic_world_modelAdjacentConfidence: LowStars: 649
Matches contextual method/domain keyword: reinforcement learning
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Research context
Tasks
Agentic tool use
Methods
Reinforcement learning
Domains
Natural Language Processing, Large Language Models, AI Agents
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.