Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: thin evidence
Time to repro: a few hours
2 risk flags

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: hot
Direct + Inferred Evidence

Some benchmark signal exists in the extracted evidence, but it is not structured strongly enough yet for a confident benchmark decision.

Benchmark signal from claims

  • With 10.6k SFT samples, the 30B OpenSeeker-v2 agent achieves state-of-the-art performance within its model scale and ReAct paradigm on BrowseComp, BrowseComp-ZH, Humanity’s Last Exam, and xbench.
  • OpenSeeker-v2 surpasses Tongyi DeepResearch, which uses CPT, SFT, and RL, by achieving 46.0% vs 43.4% on BrowseComp, 58.1% vs 46.7% on BrowseComp-ZH, 34.6% vs 32.9% on Humanity’s Last Exam, and 78.0% vs 75.0% on xbench.

Deep search capabilities have become an indispensable competency for frontier Large Language Model (LLM) agents, yet their development remains dominated by industrial giants.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: medium

PolarSeeker/OpenSeeker is the best available implementation candidate based on ranking signals, but recommendation confidence is not yet high. Dependency/environment manifests are present.

Open PolarSeeker/OpenSeeker

Reproduction Risks

  • License metadata missing
  • No CI workflows detected
Evidence disclosure

LLM evidence refs: paper.abstract, evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_6], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_caption_5], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_caption_2], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_8], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_table_2], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_table_1], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_caption_1], paper.title, summary.hasReliableImplementation

Evidence graph: 4 refs, 4 links.

Utility signals: depth 60/100, grounding 85/100, status medium.

Implementation Comparison

Top 3 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

PolarSeeker/OpenSeeker
best maintained
Maintenance: Active
Confidence: Medium
Reproducibility: Limited

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

Stars
730
Last push
May 22, 2026 (7d ago)
Dependencies

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
Maintenance: Active
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Moderate

Matched via arXiv identifier search

Stars
0
Last push
May 25, 2026 (3d ago)
CIDependencies

Risk flags

  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
  • Low confidence match
mhi33l/OpenSeeker
alternative
Maintenance: Active
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Limited

Matched via arXiv identifier search

Stars
0
Last push
May 10, 2026 (19d ago)
Dependencies

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup

Best implementation now

PolarSeeker/OpenSeeker
Confidence: Medium
Reproducibility: Limited

OpenSeeker: A search agent with open-source data and models

Stars: 730
Forks: 54
Last push: May 22, 2026
Matched via arXiv identifier search
Strong overlap with paper title keywords
Community adoption signal (730 stars)
License –
CI –
Deps ✓
Docker –
  • Selected PolarSeeker/OpenSeeker as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Reproduction readiness

Setup Required
Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: May 28, 2026

Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed

  • · PolarSeeker/OpenSeeker has requirements.txt but requires manual environment setup.
  • · No Dockerfile — you will set up the environment manually.
  • · No CI pipeline — test coverage is unknown.
Open PolarSeeker/OpenSeeker

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/PolarSeeker/OpenSeeker.git
pip install -r requirements.txt

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Datasets

No trustworthy dataset matches right now.

Search datasets on Hugging Face

Spaces

No trustworthy demo spaces right now.

Search spaces on Hugging Face

Research context

Tasks

Agentic tool use

Methods

Reinforcement learning

Domains

Natural Language Processing, Large Language Models, AI Agents

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.