Thanh Luong Tuan
Core AI workload signals detected from paper context and implementation/artifact evidence.
Enterprise adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) is constrained by hallucination, domain drift, and the inability to enforce regulatory compliance at the reasoning level. We present a neurosymbolic architecture implemented within the Foundation AgenticOS (FAOS) platform that addresses these limitations through ontology-constrained neural reasoning. Our approach introduces a three-layer ontological framework--Role, ...
Domain, and Interaction ontologies--that provides formal semantic grounding for LLM-based enterprise agents. We formalize the concept of asymmetric neurosymbolic coupling, wherein symbolic ontological knowledge constrains agent inputs (context assembly, tool discovery, governance thresholds) while proposing mechanisms for extending this coupling to constrain agent outputs (response validation, reasoning verification, compliance checking). We evaluate the architecture through a controlled experiment (600 runs across five industries: FinTech, Insurance, Healthcare, Vietnamese Banking, and Vietnamese Insurance), finding that ontology-coupled agents significantly outperform ungrounded agents on Metric Accuracy (p < .001, W = .460), Regulatory Compliance (p = .003, W = .318), and Role Consistency (p < .001, W = .614), with improvements greatest where LLM parametric knowledge is weakest--particularly in Vietnam-localized domains. Our contributions include: (1) a formal three-layer enterprise ontology model, (2) a taxonomy of neurosymbolic coupling patterns, (3) ontology-constrained tool discovery via SQL-pushdown scoring, (4) a proposed framework for output-side ontological validation, (5) empirical evidence for the inverse parametric knowledge effect that ontological grounding value is inversely proportional to LLM training data coverage of the domain, and (6) a production system serving 21 industry verticals with 650+ agents.
No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.
Enterprise adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) is constrained by hallucination, domain drift, and the inability to enforce regulatory compliance at the reasoning level.
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
Hardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 60/100, grounding 58/100, status medium.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Matched via arXiv identifier search · Strong overlap with paper title keywords
Risk flags
Matched via arXiv identifier search
Risk flags
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
Hardware requirements
No verified implementation available
No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Tasks
Agentic tool use
Methods
Transformer, Agentic systems
Domains
Natural Language Processing, Large Language Models, AI Agents
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.