Linghao Zhang
Core AI workload signals detected from paper context and implementation/artifact evidence.
The emergence of large language model (LLM)-based agent frameworks has shifted the primary challenge in building domain-expert AI agents from raw capability to effective encoding of domain expertise. Two dominant paradigms -- code-first development, which embeds expertise in deterministic pipelines, and prompt-first development, which captures expertise in static system prompts -- both treat agent construction as a d ...
iscrete engineering phase preceding deployment. We argue that this sequential assumption creates a fundamental mismatch with the nature of domain expertise, which is substantially tacit, deeply personal, and continuously evolving. We propose Nurture-First Development (NFD), a paradigm in which agents are initialized with minimal scaffolding and progressively grown through structured conversational interaction with domain practitioners. The central mechanism is the Knowledge Crystallization Cycle, whereby fragmented knowledge embedded in operational dialogue is periodically consolidated into structured, reusable knowledge assets. We formalize NFD through: (1) a Three-Layer Cognitive Architecture organizing agent knowledge by volatility and personalization degree; (2) the Knowledge Crystallization Cycle with formal definitions of crystallization operations and efficiency metrics; and (3) an operational framework comprising a Dual-Workspace Pattern and Spiral Development Model. We illustrate the paradigm through a detailed case study on building a financial research agent for U.S. equity analysis and discuss the conditions, limitations, and broader implications of NFD for human-agent co-evolution.
No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.
The emergence of large language model (LLM)-based agent frameworks has shifted the primary challenge in building domain-expert AI agents from raw capability to effective encoding of domain expertise.
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
Hardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 60/100, grounding 58/100, status medium.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Matched via arXiv identifier search
Risk flags
Matched via arXiv identifier search
Risk flags
Matched via arXiv identifier search
Risk flags
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
Hardware requirements
No verified implementation available
No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Datasets
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Tasks
Agentic tool use
Methods
Transformer
Domains
Natural Language Processing, Large Language Models, AI Agents
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.