Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

MMA: Multimodal Memory Agent

Yihao Lu, Wanru Cheng, Zeyu Zhang, Hao TangPublished Feb 18, 2026
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Context only
Use as context only
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
2
Review before use

Abstract

Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.

Long-horizon multimodal agents depend on external memory; however, similarity-based retrieval often surfaces stale, low-credibility, or conflicting items, which can trigger overconfident errors. We propose Multimodal Memory Agent (MMA), which assigns each retrieved memory item a dynamic reliability score by combining source credibility, temporal decay, and conflict-aware network consensus, and uses this signal to reweight evidence and abstain when support is insufficient. We also introduce MMA-Bench, a programmatically generated benchmark for belief dynamics with controlled speaker reliability and structured text-vision contradictions. Using this framework, we uncover the "Visual Placebo Effect", revealing how RAG-based agents inherit latent visual biases from foundation models. On FEVER, MMA matches baseline accuracy while reducing variance by 35.2% and improving selective utility; on LoCoMo, a safety-oriented configuration improves actionable accuracy and reduces wrong answers; on MMA-Bench, MMA reaches 41.18% Type-B accuracy in Vision mode, while the baseline collapses to 0.0% under the same protocol. Code: https://github.com/AIGeeksGroup/MMA.

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: warm
Long-horizon multimodal agents depend on external memory; however, similarity-based retrieval often surfaces stale, low-credibility, or conflicting items, which can trigger overconfident errors.

Implementation

No direct implementation yet

Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.

Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.

Implementation evidence summary
Confidence: low

Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.

Reproduction risks
  • Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

somtri/flashbulb
alternative
Maintenance
Active
Confidence
Medium
Reproducibility
Strong
Stars
1
Last push
Aug 19, 2026 (6d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

  • No tagged releases
AIGeeksGroup/MMA
alternative
Maintenance
Recently updated
Confidence
Medium
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
23
Last push
Mar 30, 2026 (148d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Aug 25, 2026

No repo

No verified implementation available

  • No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Repositories and ecosystem

Official

No additional official repositories detected.

Community

  • somtri/flashbulb
    Confidence: Medium

    Drift-adaptive, zero-write-token memory for a Qwen agent (Qwen Cloud Hackathon, Track 1 MemoryAgent). Two token-free signals; +0.35 clean recall under drift vs SOTA; Alibaba ECS + OSS.

    1 stars · 0 forks · Last push Aug 19, 2026 · MIT license

  • AIGeeksGroup/MMA
    Confidence: Medium

    MMA: Multimodal Memory Agent

    23 stars · 4 forks · Last push Mar 30, 2026

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

Tasks

Agentic tool use, Retrieval / indexing

Methods

Retrieval-augmented generation

Domains

Computer vision, AI Agents, Information Retrieval

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers