MITRA-Swarm: Injecting Explicit Linguistic Structure into Foundation Models for Classical Machine Translation

Classical Sanskrit poses three challenges unresolved by single-call monolithic models: morphophonemic fusion Sandhi, dense nominal compounding Samāsa, and discourse-level zero-anaphora forced by poetic meter. We present MITRA-Swarm, a multi-agent architecture injecting explicit linguistic structure into an otherwise monolithic pipeline: a Sandhi-splitting agent, a parallel array of generalist gemma-4-26B-A4B-it and domain-specialized gemma-2-mitra-it translators, and a discourse-aware Ellipsis Restorer that consults corpus-derived register tags to avoid inventing active-voice subjects in impersonal legal and philosophical registers. Two separated judges evaluate quality: a routing judge ($J_{\text{route}}$, same model family as the generators) driving an internal critique loop, and an independent reporting judge ($J_{\text{report}}=$gpt-4o-mini, no shared vendor lineage) scoring every output exactly once. On a stratified benchmark of 1,000 verses across five registers (23,990 scored verdicts, 12-condition pre-registered ablation), the full swarm reaches $85.90$ MQM against a monolithic baseline of $85.27$ ($Δ=+0.63$, $p_{\text{adj}}=0.0018$, 95% CI $[+0.30,+0.97]$), and isolated discourse restoration alone accounts for $+0.44$ MQM ($p_{\text{adj}}=0.0288$), outperforming a call-count-matched self-refinement baseline by $+0.51$ MQM ($p_{\text{adj}}=0.0288$). Severe per-verse failures (MQM$<80$) fall from $9.0\%$ to $7.6\%$, at roughly $9\times$ the per-verse inference cost of the baseline. Additionally, $J_{\text{route}}$ scores its own family's outputs $2$-$7$ MQM higher than $J_{\text{report}}$ on every one of the 12 conditions, empirically motivating the two-judge split; and a preflight screen of a 192,151-entry retrieval index against all 12 evaluation works verifies 0 reference leaks across 269 runtime checks. These are small gains on a metric saturating near 85-86.