Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Memory-Centric Continual Learning for AI Agents

Dongfang Li, Zhuoen Chen, Bonian Jia, Zixuan Liu, Zhengxuan Lu +23 morePublished Oct 21, 2026
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Context only
Use as context only
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
1
Review before use

Abstract

Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.

Autonomous agents powered by foundation models can reason, plan, and use tools, but their fixed weights and context limits hinder sustained learning from experience over long-term deployment. While external memory systems attempt to bridge this gap, they mostly act as passive retrieval caches, evaluated primarily by whether they can recall stored facts or past interactions. Whether memory can drive genuine continual learning remains an open question. In this paper, we introduce Memory-Centric Continual Learning (MCCL), arguing that memory should be judged by whether it improves future actions, not merely what it retrieves. MCCL has three main parts. First, a three-axis taxonomy organizes memory by where state is stored (substrates), what form it takes (assets), and how it is managed (policies). This defines a two-loop lifecycle that updates memory state in an inner loop while refining management policies in an outer loop based on task feedback. Second, an evaluation protocol measures retention under interference, adaptation to change, and task transfer to isolate genuine behavioral gains from simple context expansion. Third, a memory scaling framework models how agent performance scales with experience, storage capacity, and compute budgets across non-parametric and parametric memory. Together, these components reframe agent memory from passive lookup to continuous learning, offering a principled route toward self-improving autonomous agents.

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: warm
Autonomous agents powered by foundation models can reason, plan, and use tools, but their fixed weights and context limits hinder sustained learning from experience over long-term deployment.

Implementation

No direct implementation yet

Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.

Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.

Implementation evidence summary
Confidence: low

wuyoscar/AISafetyHot-Hub is the closest maintained adjacent implementation (Matched via arXiv identifier search). It is not paper-verified; validate algorithm and evaluation setup against the paper before trusting reported metrics. Community adoption signal: 1658 GitHub stars.

Reproduction risks
  • Adjacent implementations are not paper-verified
  • Recommended repository is adjacent and not paper-verified.
  • Adjacent implementation match confidence is low.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

Maintenance
Active
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Strong
Stars
1
Last push
Oct 18, 2026 (8d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search

  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
  • Low confidence match
Maintenance
Active
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
0
Last push
Oct 19, 2026 (6d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search

  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
  • Dependency manifest missing
Maintenance
Active
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
0
Last push
Oct 12, 2026 (13d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search

  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
  • Low confidence match

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Oct 25, 2026

No repo

No verified implementation available

  • No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Repositories and ecosystem

Closest related implementations

These are not paper-verified. Use them as reference points when no direct implementation is available.

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

Tasks

Agentic tool use, Retrieval / indexing

Methods

Retrieval-augmented generation

Domains

AI Agents, Information Retrieval

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.