Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Learning to Explore: Scaling Agentic Reasoning via Exploration-Aware Policy Optimization

Xingyuan Hua, Sheng Yue, Ju RenPublished May 9, 2026
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Context only
Use as context only
Benchmark evidence
Thin evidence
Verify before relying
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
2
Review before use

Abstract

Domain fit: AI-core · Core AI workload signals detected from paper context and implementation/artifact evidence.

Recent advancements in agentic test-time scaling allow models to gather environmental feedback before committing to final actions. A key limitation of existing methods is that they typically employ undifferentiated exploration strategies, lacking the ability to adaptively distinguish when exploration is truly required. In this paper, we propose an exploration-aware reinforcement learning framework that enables LLM agents to adaptively explore only when uncertainty is high. Our method introduces a fine-grained reward function via variational inference that explicitly evaluates exploratory actions by estimating their potential to improve future decision-making, together with an exploration-aware grouping mechanism that separates exploratory actions from task-completion actions during optimization. By targeting informational gaps, this design allows agents to explore selectively and transition to execution as soon as the task context is clear. Empirically, we demonstrate that our approach achieves consistent improvements across a range of challenging text-based and GUI-based agent benchmarks. Code is available at https://github.com/HansenHua/EAPO-ICML26 and models are available at https://huggingface.co/hansenhua/EAPO-ICML26.

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: hot
Recent advancements in agentic test-time scaling allow models to gather environmental feedback before committing to final actions.
Task Dataset Metric Value Source
Agentic tool use ALFWorld EAPO . 58.5 paper-derived
Agentic tool use WebShop EAPO . 33.2 paper-derived

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure below.

Implementation

No direct implementation yet

Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.

Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.

Implementation evidence summary
Confidence: low

No direct maintained repository implementation was found, but paper-linked Hugging Face artifacts are available.

Reproduction risks
  • Estimate assumes artifact-level reproduction; full training reproduction may require additional paper details.

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Aug 26, 2026

No repo

No verified implementation available

  • No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Hugging Face artifacts

Datasets

No trustworthy datasets matches right now.

Search datasets on Hugging Face

Spaces

No trustworthy spaces matches right now.

Search spaces on Hugging Face

Research context

Tasks

Agentic tool use

Methods

Reinforcement learning

Domains

Large Language Models, AI Agents

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.