Learning to Explore: Scaling Agentic Reasoning via Exploration-Aware Policy Optimization
Abstract
Domain fit: AI-core · Core AI workload signals detected from paper context and implementation/artifact evidence.
Recent advancements in agentic test-time scaling allow models to gather environmental feedback before committing to final actions. A key limitation of existing methods is that they typically employ undifferentiated exploration strategies, lacking the ability to adaptively distinguish when exploration is truly required. In this paper, we propose an exploration-aware reinforcement learning framework that enables LLM agents to adaptively explore only when uncertainty is high. Our method introduces a fine-grained reward function via variational inference that explicitly evaluates exploratory actions by estimating their potential to improve future decision-making, together with an exploration-aware grouping mechanism that separates exploratory actions from task-completion actions during optimization. By targeting informational gaps, this design allows agents to explore selectively and transition to execution as soon as the task context is clear. Empirically, we demonstrate that our approach achieves consistent improvements across a range of challenging text-based and GUI-based agent benchmarks. Code is available at https://github.com/HansenHua/EAPO-ICML26 and models are available at https://huggingface.co/hansenhua/EAPO-ICML26.
Results and benchmarks
Recent advancements in agentic test-time scaling allow models to gather environmental feedback before committing to final actions.
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic tool use | ALFWorld | EAPO . | 58.5 | paper-derived |
| Agentic tool use | WebShop | EAPO . | 33.2 | paper-derived |
Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure below.
Evidence graph: 3 refs, 2 links.
Utility signals: depth 95/100, grounding 78/100, status high.
Implementation
No direct implementation yet
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.
No verified maintained repo yet
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- Use the paper-linked Hugging Face release as the starting artifact, then reconstruct training and evaluation settings from the paper.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Start from this likely method family: Reinforcement learning.
Time to first repro: a few days · Best available artifact: hansenhua/EAPO-ICML26
No direct maintained repository implementation was found, but paper-linked Hugging Face artifacts are available.
- Estimate assumes artifact-level reproduction; full training reproduction may require additional paper details.
Reproduction readiness
No repo
No verified implementation available
- No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Hugging Face artifacts
Models
Datasets
No trustworthy datasets matches right now.
Search datasets on Hugging FaceSpaces
No trustworthy spaces matches right now.
Search spaces on Hugging FaceResearch context
Tasks
Agentic tool use
Methods
Reinforcement learning
Domains
Large Language Models, AI Agents
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.