GRASP: GRanularity-Aware Search Policy for Agentic RAG
Abstract
Domain fit: AI-core · Core AI workload signals detected from paper context and implementation/artifact evidence.
Agentic retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) extends static RAG by allowing language models to iteratively reason, generate search queries, retrieve evidence, and predict answers. However, it remains challenging for models to decide when to retrieve, whether to use lexical matching or semantic similarity, and how to control context granularity to prevent irrelevant tokens from interfering with agent reasoning. In this paper, we introduce GRASP, a reinforcement learning (RL) framework for training agents to adaptively coordinate complementary retrieval tools during multi-step reasoning. GRASP provides the agent with semantic search, keyword search, and paragraph-reading actions, enabling it to retrieve sentence-level evidence and expand further context only when needed. We train the policy with a reward that jointly accounts for answer accuracy, grounded reading, complementary search, and turn efficiency. Experiments on multi-hop reasoning benchmarks show that GRASP improves both retrieval recall and downstream question answering performance compared with single-step retrieval, prompting-based agentic RAG, and RL-based retrieval baselines. Qualitative and ablation analyses show that the learned policy develops interpretable skimming and scanning behavior: it uses semantic search for broad exploration, paragraph reading for local verification, and keyword search for entity-specific evidence. These results suggest that learning to coordinate retrieval signals and context granularity is critical for agent's correct reasoning.
Results and benchmarks
Agentic retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) extends static RAG by allowing language models to iteratively reason, generate search queries, retrieve evidence, and predict answers.
Benchmark evidence is limited
Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.
Utility signals: depth 65/100, grounding 75/100, status medium.
Implementation
No direct implementation yet
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.
No verified maintained repo yet
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No maintained paper-verified implementation was found; start with the closest related repositories below.
- Compare repo methods against the paper equations/algorithm before trusting metrics.
- Create a minimal baseline implementation from the paper and use adjacent repos as references.
Time to first repro: a few days
kruschdev/krusch-context-mcp is the closest maintained adjacent implementation (Matched via arXiv identifier search). It is not paper-verified; validate algorithm and evaluation setup against the paper before trusting reported metrics. Community adoption signal: 71 GitHub stars.
- Adjacent implementations are not paper-verified
- Recommended repository is adjacent and not paper-verified.
- Adjacent implementation match confidence is low.
Reproduction readiness
No repo
No verified implementation available
- No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Validation caveat
Repositories and ecosystem
Closest related implementations
These are not paper-verified. Use them as reference points when no direct implementation is available.
- kruschdev/krusch-context-mcp Adjacent · Confidence: Low · 71 stars
Matched via arXiv identifier search
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Research context
Tasks
Agentic tool use, Retrieval / indexing
Methods
Reinforcement learning
Domains
Natural Language Processing, AI Agents, Information Retrieval
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.