Emergent Collusion in Long-Horizon LLM Agent Interaction
Abstract
Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
LLM agents are increasingly deployed in collaborative settings, yet long-term interaction may give rise to undesirable coordination. We study the emergence of collusion in a long-horizon multi-agent environment: two agents repeatedly complete individual tasks, share task logs, verify each other's work, and receive rewards. We introduce realistic constraints that make compliance with the verification protocol incompatible with reward maximization, and find that agents increasingly deviate from the protocol over repeated interactions. Collusion emerges in 94% of trajectories across 10 models, and more capable models within the same family reach it earlier. Controlled peer interventions show that collusion is shaped by peer behavior, while ablations reveal additional effects of reward structure, the verification feedback agents receive, and their interaction history. In particular, restricting the amount and scope of interaction history available to agents reduces collusion. Overall, our findings show that long-horizon interaction can reshape how agents coordinate in ways that create safety risks.
Results and benchmarks
LLM agents are increasingly deployed in collaborative settings, yet long-term interaction may give rise to undesirable coordination.
Benchmark evidence is limited
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 60/100, grounding 58/100, status medium.
Implementation
No direct implementation yet
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.
No verified maintained repo yet
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Time to first repro: a few days
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
- Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow
Compare implementation paths
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
- Maintenance
- Recently updated
- Confidence
- Medium
- Reproducibility
- Moderate
- Stars
- 15
- Last push
- Sep 24, 2026 (32d)
Matched via arXiv identifier search · Strong overlap with paper title keywords
- No CI pipeline detected
- No tagged releases
- No Docker setup
- Maintenance
- Active
- Confidence
- Low
- Reproducibility
- Moderate
- Stars
- 2
- Last push
- Oct 6, 2026 (20d)
Matched via arXiv identifier search
- No CI pipeline detected
- No tagged releases
- No Docker setup
- Maintenance
- Active
- Confidence
- Low
- Reproducibility
- Moderate
- Stars
- 0
- Last push
- Oct 13, 2026 (12d)
Matched via arXiv identifier search
- No CI pipeline detected
- No tagged releases
- No Docker setup
Reproduction readiness
No repo
No verified implementation available
- No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Validation caveat
Repositories and ecosystem
Official
No additional official repositories detected.
Community
- SALT-NLP/agent-collusionConfidence: Medium
Code for the paper "Emergent Collusion in Long-Horizon LLM Agent Interaction"
15 stars · 0 forks · Last push Sep 24, 2026 · MIT license
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
- yukiwukii/joint-task-collusion
Confidence: Low · 2 stars
- ebenl08/apart-collusion-study
Confidence: Low · 0 stars
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Datasets
Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Research context
Tasks
Agentic tool use
Methods
Transformer
Domains
Large Language Models, AI Agents
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.