BharatSynthQA: A Context-Grounded Question Answering Dataset on Indian Temples and Religious Heritage
Abstract
Domain fit: AI-core · Core AI workload signals detected from paper context and implementation/artifact evidence.
India's temples and other places of worship are among its richest repositories of cultural heritage, bringing together religious tradition, history, architecture, and art. Due to the widespread curiosity, people increasingly turn to Artificial Intelligence (AI) assistants for information about them. Current models are rarely trained or evaluated on this domain. We present BharatSynthQA, a passage grounded question answering (QA) dataset focused on Indian temples, which also covers other religious sites connected to them. Our pipeline crawls Wikipedia from topics seeded by authentic heritage sources, filters articles for topical relevance, and locations in India. Further it generates Boolean, factoid, and explanatory QA pairs with a fewshot prompted LLM. An LLM judge filters the pairs on answer correctness, retaining 98,677 of 131,494 generated pairs. Additionally, 300 human-annotated pairs are released separately as a reference set. Human evaluation of the subsample of this dataset showed 89.83% of the questions were formed correctly. Benchmarking five current LLMs shows that factoid token F1 is only 0.18-0.30 without the source passage but 0.73-0.77 with it, indicating that this domain is poorly captured in model knowledge. The dataset is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/theshivam7/bharatsynth-qa to support research on culturally grounded QA and retrieval-augmented generation for Indian heritage.
Results and benchmarks
India's temples and other places of worship are among its richest repositories of cultural heritage, bringing together religious tradition, history, architecture, and art.
Benchmark evidence is limited
LLM evidence refs: paper.title, summary.hasReliableImplementation, guidance.mode
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 60/100, grounding 58/100, status medium.
Implementation
No direct implementation yet
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.
No verified maintained repo yet
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- Use the paper-linked Hugging Face release as the starting artifact, then reconstruct training and evaluation settings from the paper.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Time to first repro: a few days
No direct maintained repository implementation was found, but paper-linked Hugging Face artifacts are available.
- Estimate assumes artifact-level reproduction; full training reproduction may require additional paper details.
Reproduction readiness
No repo
No verified implementation available
- No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Validation caveat
Hugging Face artifacts
Models
No trustworthy models matches right now.
Search models on Hugging FaceDatasets
Spaces
No trustworthy spaces matches right now.
Search spaces on Hugging FaceResearch context
Tasks
Instruction tuning, Retrieval / indexing
Methods
Transformer, Retrieval-augmented generation
Domains
Large Language Models, Information Retrieval
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
LLM evidence refs: paper.title, summary.hasReliableImplementation, guidance.mode