Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Δτ-Bench: Pushing Agents Toward a Moving Capability

Shuofei Qiao, Xuanguang Pan, Yijun Chen, Wendi Feng, Bin Wu +4 morePublished Oct 25, 2026
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Context only
Use as context only
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
2
Review before use

Abstract

Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.

In this paper, we introduce $Δτ$-Bench, an executable agent benchmark that models the structural evolution of large tool ecosystems. In $Δτ$-Bench, independently evolving services continually reshape how tasks can be accomplished: familiar tools may disappear or be replaced, while more efficient alternatives emerge amid overlapping functionality and noisy documentation. Against this moving capability frontier, we evaluate whether agents can proactively discover efficient tool-use paths and promptly revise their accumulated procedural knowledge, bringing together demands that existing benchmarks fail to examine. $Δτ$-Bench comprises 1,588 validated multi-turn tasks across 42 domains and six successive ecosystem states generated through capability-preserving transformations. Our evaluation shows that even the strongest evaluated model or harness achieves only 42.3% task success, while initial gains from existing skill-learning methods can not consistently translate into better adaptation as the ecosystem evolves. These findings motivate Steward, an ecosystem manager that jointly manages tools and procedural knowledge through incremental skill maintenance and dynamic provisioning during task execution. Experiments show that Steward sustains higher task success across ecosystem changes with lower skill-maintenance overhead, while improving both recovery from disrupted workflows and adoption of more efficient alternatives.

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: warm
In this paper, we introduce $Δτ$-Bench, an executable agent benchmark that models the structural evolution of large tool ecosystems.

Implementation

No direct implementation yet

Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.

Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.

Implementation evidence summary
Confidence: low

Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.

Reproduction risks
  • Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

Maintenance
Active
Confidence
Medium
Reproducibility
Strong
Stars
5
Last push
Oct 27, 2026 (4d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
Maintenance
Active
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
0
Last push
Oct 26, 2026 (4d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search

  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
  • Low confidence match

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Oct 30, 2026

No repo

No verified implementation available

  • No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Repositories and ecosystem

Official

No additional official repositories detected.

Community

  • zjunlp/delta-tau-bench
    Confidence: Medium

    Δτ-Bench: Pushing Agents Toward a Moving Capability Frontier

    5 stars · 0 forks · Last push Oct 27, 2026 · MIT license

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

Tasks

Agentic tool use

Methods

Agentic systems

Domains

AI Agents

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.