Xiaojun Wu, Cehao Yang, Honghao Liu, Xueyuan Lin, Wenjie Zhang, Zhichao Shi, Xuhui Jiang, Chengjin Xu, Jia Li, Jian Guo
Core AI workload signals detected from paper context and implementation/artifact evidence.
LLM agents increasingly rely on external inference conditions: prompts, tools, memory, SOPs, skills, and harness feedback. These assets can improve task execution without changing model weights, but they are often revised by heuristic reflection or by reusing observed successes and failures as if counts alone were reliable belief. We introduce \textbf{Bayesian-Agent}, a native and cross-harness framework that treats ...
reusable skills and SOPs as hypotheses about whether a frozen model will succeed under a particular prompt, context, and harness environment. Bayesian-Agent records verified trajectory evidence, maintains a feature-conditioned categorical posterior over each skill, and maps posterior state into inspectable actions such as patch, split, compress, retire, and explore. Model-facing prompts receive executable guardrails and failure-mode patches, while posterior summaries remain available for audit. With \texttt{deepseek-v4-flash}, incremental repair improves SOP-Bench from 80\% to 95\%, Lifelong AgentBench from 90\% to 100\%, and RealFin-Bench from 45\% to 65\%. We further evaluate Bayesian-Agent's native backend and optional GenericAgent, mini-swe-agent, and Claude Code backends. The results include positive, negative, saturated, and case-study settings, suggesting that agent skill evolution is best viewed as posterior-guided harness optimization rather than uncalibrated prompt accumulation. The source code is available at https://github.com/DataArcTech/Bayesian-Agent.
No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.
LLM agents increasingly rely on external inference conditions: prompts, tools, memory, SOPs, skills, and harness feedback.
DataArcTech/Bayesian-Agent is the best available implementation candidate based on ranking signals, but recommendation confidence is not yet high. CI workflows are present. License is declared (MIT).
Open DataArcTech/Bayesian-AgentEvidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.
Utility signals: depth 55/100, grounding 75/100, status medium.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Matched via arXiv identifier search · Strong overlap with paper title keywords
Risk flags
🥇 Not Just Another Agent Framework, But a Bayesian Evolution Layer That Can Work Across Harnesses
Ready to reproduce
Quick start
git clone https://github.com/DataArcTech/Bayesian-Agent.git
pip install -e .No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.
No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.
No trustworthy model matches right now.
Search models on Hugging FaceBroaden dataset search
No trustworthy demo spaces right now.
Search spaces on Hugging FaceTasks
Agentic tool use
Methods
Transformer
Domains
Large Language Models, AI Agents
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.