Aviary: training language agents on challenging scientific tasks
Abstract
Domain fit: AI-core · Core AI workload signals detected from paper context and implementation/artifact evidence.
Solving complex real-world tasks requires cycles of actions and observations. This is particularly true in science, where tasks require many cycles of analysis, tool use, and experimentation. Language agents are promising for automating intellectual tasks in science because they can interact with tools via natural language or code. Yet their flexibility creates conceptual and practical challenges for software implementations, since agents may comprise non-standard components such as internal reasoning, planning, tool usage, as well as the inherent stochasticity of temperature-sampled language models. Here, we introduce Aviary, an extensible gymnasium for language agents. We formalize agents as policies solving language-grounded partially observable Markov decision processes, which we term language decision processes. We then implement five environments, including three challenging scientific environments: (1) manipulating DNA constructs for molecular cloning, (2) answering research questions by accessing scientific literature, and (3) engineering protein stability. These environments were selected for their focus on multi-step reasoning and their relevance to contemporary biology research. Finally, with online training and scaling inference-time compute, we show that language agents backed by open-source, non-frontier LLMs can match and exceed both frontier LLM agents and human experts on multiple tasks at up to 100x lower inference cost.
Results and benchmarks
Solving complex real-world tasks requires cycles of actions and observations.
Benchmark evidence is limited
Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.
Utility signals: depth 35/100, grounding 75/100, status low.
Implementation
Best maintained implementation now
High accuracy RAG for answering questions from scientific documents with citations
9,080 stars · 911 forks · Last push Aug 12, 2026 · Apache-2.0 license
- License
- CI
- Dependencies
- Docker
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Community adoption signal (9080 stars)
future-house/paper-qa is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. CI workflows are present. License is declared (Apache-2.0).
Open future-house/paper-qa- No repository-level red flags were detected, but paper-specific preprocessing and hyperparameter details may still be under-specified.
- Selected future-house/paper-qa as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
- Includes CI workflow signals.
- Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
- Repository activity is within the last 24 months.
Compare implementation paths
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
- Maintenance
- Active
- Confidence
- High
- Reproducibility
- Strong
- Stars
- 9,080
- Last push
- Aug 12, 2026 (13d)
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Community adoption signal (9080 stars)
- No Docker setup
- Maintenance
- Active
- Confidence
- High
- Reproducibility
- Strong
- Stars
- 274
- Last push
- Aug 19, 2026 (6d)
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Matched via arXiv identifier search
- No Docker setup
- Maintenance
- Active
- Confidence
- High
- Reproducibility
- Strong
- Stars
- 137
- Last push
- Aug 12, 2026 (13d)
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Matched via arXiv identifier search
- No Docker setup
Reproduction readiness
Ready to run
Ready to reproduce
- Clone future-house/paper-qa and install dependencies from pyproject.toml.
- CI pipeline detected, so automated tests are in place.
- Last updated 13 days ago.
Quick start
git clone https://github.com/future-house/paper-qa.git
pip install -e . Validation caveat
Repositories and ecosystem
Official
- Future-House/ldpConfidence: High
Framework enabling modular interchange of language agents, environments, and optimizers
137 stars · 18 forks · Last push Aug 12, 2026 · Apache-2.0 license
Community
No additional community repositories detected yet.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
- Future-House/paper-qa
Confidence: Low · 9,080 stars
- Aurora-Xiang/PaperQA2
Confidence: Low · 4 stars
- 0gaowei/paper-agent
Confidence: Low · 0 stars
- parantushah/paper-qa
Confidence: Low · 0 stars
- Prakhar-CCXXI/Scholar-Assist-AI
Confidence: Low · 0 stars
Hugging Face artifacts
No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.
Models
No trustworthy models matches right now.
Search models on Hugging FaceDatasets
No trustworthy datasets matches right now.
Search datasets on Hugging FaceSpaces
- HuggingFaceTB/smol-training-playbook
3,268 likes
Research context
Tasks
Agentic tool use
Methods
Transformer
Domains
Natural Language Processing, Large Language Models, AI Agents
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).