Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Aviary: training language agents on challenging scientific tasks

Siddharth Narayanan, James D. Braza, Ryan-Rhys Griffiths, Manu Ponnapati, Albert Bou +6 morePublished Dec 30, 2024
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few hours
Fast first run
Risk flags
0
None detected

Abstract

Domain fit: AI-core · Core AI workload signals detected from paper context and implementation/artifact evidence.

Solving complex real-world tasks requires cycles of actions and observations. This is particularly true in science, where tasks require many cycles of analysis, tool use, and experimentation. Language agents are promising for automating intellectual tasks in science because they can interact with tools via natural language or code. Yet their flexibility creates conceptual and practical challenges for software implementations, since agents may comprise non-standard components such as internal reasoning, planning, tool usage, as well as the inherent stochasticity of temperature-sampled language models. Here, we introduce Aviary, an extensible gymnasium for language agents. We formalize agents as policies solving language-grounded partially observable Markov decision processes, which we term language decision processes. We then implement five environments, including three challenging scientific environments: (1) manipulating DNA constructs for molecular cloning, (2) answering research questions by accessing scientific literature, and (3) engineering protein stability. These environments were selected for their focus on multi-step reasoning and their relevance to contemporary biology research. Finally, with online training and scaling inference-time compute, we show that language agents backed by open-source, non-frontier LLMs can match and exceed both frontier LLM agents and human experts on multiple tasks at up to 100x lower inference cost.

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: hot
Solving complex real-world tasks requires cycles of actions and observations.

Implementation

Best maintained implementation now

Recommended
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Strong

High accuracy RAG for answering questions from scientific documents with citations

9,080 stars · 911 forks · Last push Aug 12, 2026 · Apache-2.0 license

  • License
  • CI
  • Dependencies
  • Docker

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Community adoption signal (9080 stars)

Why this implementation
Confidence: high

future-house/paper-qa is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. CI workflows are present. License is declared (Apache-2.0).

Open future-house/paper-qa
Reproduction risks
  • No repository-level red flags were detected, but paper-specific preprocessing and hyperparameter details may still be under-specified.
  • Selected future-house/paper-qa as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes CI workflow signals.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

future-house/paper-qa
best maintained
Maintenance
Active
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Strong
Stars
9,080
Last push
Aug 12, 2026 (13d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Community adoption signal (9080 stars)

  • No Docker setup
Future-House/aviary
historical official
Maintenance
Active
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Strong
Stars
274
Last push
Aug 19, 2026 (6d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Matched via arXiv identifier search

  • No Docker setup
Future-House/ldp
alternative
Maintenance
Active
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Strong
Stars
137
Last push
Aug 12, 2026 (13d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Matched via arXiv identifier search

  • No Docker setup

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: Aug 24, 2026

Ready to run

Ready to reproduce

  • Clone future-house/paper-qa and install dependencies from pyproject.toml.
  • CI pipeline detected, so automated tests are in place.
  • Last updated 13 days ago.
Open future-house/paper-qa

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/future-house/paper-qa.git
pip install -e .

Repositories and ecosystem

Official

  • Future-House/ldp
    Confidence: High

    Framework enabling modular interchange of language agents, environments, and optimizers

    137 stars · 18 forks · Last push Aug 12, 2026 · Apache-2.0 license

Community

No additional community repositories detected yet.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Models

No trustworthy models matches right now.

Search models on Hugging Face

Datasets

No trustworthy datasets matches right now.

Search datasets on Hugging Face

Research context

Tasks

Agentic tool use

Methods

Transformer

Domains

Natural Language Processing, Large Language Models, AI Agents

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).