Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

AgentWorld: Benchmarking Long-Horizon Collaboration of Multi-agent LLMs

Raphael Shu, Yusen Zhang, Young Min Cho, Jin Mo Yang, Yuan Yuan +5 morePublished Sep 25, 2026
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Context only
Use as context only
Benchmark evidence
Thin evidence
Verify before relying
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
2
Review before use

Abstract

Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.

Existing multi-agent benchmarks primarily test in competitive settings, short-horizon interactions under 20 steps, or simply aggregate individual performance, failing to isolate and highlight genuine collaboration capabilities of LLM-based agents. We introduce AgentWorld, a benchmark of 100 human-annotated tasks (with 100 augmented variants) for evaluating long-horizon, multi-agent collaboration. Tasks span 50+ interaction rounds across a rich MMORPG sandbox and require 3-20 agents with asymmetric roles and abilities to coordinate through communication, joint planning, and resource sharing under a blackbox setting where each agent acts independently without access to others' internal states. To quantify collaboration effectiveness in addition to conventional binary task success, we propose Causal Collaboration Effectiveness (CCE), a graph-based metric that traces causal dependencies between agent actions and measures what fraction of a team's effort actually contributed to the outcome. Experiments with Gemini 3 Flash, Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5 Mini, and DeepSeek R1-70B show that even the best model achieves only 52.0% task success, with systematic failure modes including communication breakdowns, role confusion, and inability to maintain shared plans across rounds. AgentWorld is fully open-source.

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: hot
Existing multi-agent benchmarks primarily test in competitive settings, short-horizon interactions under 20 steps, or simply aggregate individual performance, failing to isolate and highlight genuine collaboration capabilities of LLM-based agents.
Task Dataset Metric Value Source
Agentic tool use Gemini 3 Flash Claude Sonnet 4 0.338 paper-derived
Agentic tool use Claude Haiku 4.5 GPT-4.1 0.294 paper-derived

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure below.

Implementation

No direct implementation yet

Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.

Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.

Implementation evidence summary
Confidence: low

Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.

Reproduction risks
  • Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

Maintenance
Active
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
2
Last push
Oct 24, 2026 (5d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search

  • No Docker setup
  • Dependency manifest missing
  • Low confidence match
Maintenance
Active
Confidence
Medium
Reproducibility
Strong
Stars
0
Last push
Oct 25, 2026 (5d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Oct 29, 2026

No repo

No verified implementation available

  • No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Repositories and ecosystem

Official

No additional official repositories detected.

Community

  • sinkytiger/agentworld-lite
    Confidence: Medium

    Unofficial lightweight testbed for multi-agent LLM collaboration: AgentWorld's CCE metric + AutoGym-style blueprint-first task generation. Runs on Claude or free Ollama models.

    0 stars · 0 forks · Last push Oct 25, 2026 · MIT license

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

Tasks

Agentic tool use

Methods

Transformer

Domains

Large Language Models, AI Agents

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.