Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

AgentRx: Diagnosing AI Agent Failures from Execution Trajectories

Shraddha Barke, Arnav Goyal, Alind Khare, Avaljot Singh, Suman Nath +1 morePublished Feb 2, 2026
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Context only
Use as context only
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
1
Review before use

Abstract

Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.

AI agents often fail in ways that are difficult to localize because executions are probabilistic, long-horizon, multi-agent, and mediated by noisy tool outputs. We address this gap by manually annotating failed agent runs and release a novel benchmark of 170 trajectories across 11 diverse task settings, including structured API workflows, incident management, and open-ended web/file tasks. Each trajectory is annotated with a critical failure step and a category from a grounded-theory derived, cross-domain failure taxonomy. To mitigate the human cost of failure attribution, we present AgentRx, an $\textit{automated diagnostic framework}$ that pinpoints the critical failure step in a failed agent trajectory. It synthesizes constraints, evaluates them step-by-step, and produces an auditable validation log of constraint violations with associated evidence; an LLM-based judge uses this log to localize the critical step and category. AgentRx improves step localization by 75% on average over prior work, while providing failure category attribution.

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: warm
AI agents often fail in ways that are difficult to localize because executions are probabilistic, long-horizon, multi-agent, and mediated by noisy tool outputs.

Implementation

No direct implementation yet

Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.

Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.

Implementation evidence summary
Confidence: low

microsoft/AgentRx is the closest maintained adjacent implementation (Matched via arXiv identifier search). It is not paper-verified; validate algorithm and evaluation setup against the paper before trusting reported metrics. Community adoption signal: 160 GitHub stars.

Reproduction risks
  • Adjacent implementations are not paper-verified
  • Recommended repository is adjacent and not paper-verified.
  • Adjacent implementation match confidence is low.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

chirag-7/AgentRx
alternative
Maintenance
Recently updated
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Strong
Stars
0
Last push
Jul 30, 2026 (91d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search

  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
  • Low confidence match
Maintenance
Recently updated
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Strong
Stars
0
Last push
Jun 22, 2026 (129d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search

  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
  • Low confidence match
Maintenance
Active
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Strong
Stars
0
Last push
Oct 19, 2026 (11d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search

  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
  • Low confidence match

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Oct 29, 2026

No repo

No verified implementation available

  • No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Repositories and ecosystem

Closest related implementations

These are not paper-verified. Use them as reference points when no direct implementation is available.

  • microsoft/AgentRx Adjacent · Confidence: Low · 160 stars

    Matched via arXiv identifier search

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

Tasks

Agentic tool use

Methods

Transformer

Domains

Large Language Models, AI Agents

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.