Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Activity Frames: Deterministic Screen-Activity Compilation for Agent Memory and Replay

Nossa IyamuPublished Aug 6, 2026
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few hours
Fast first run
Risk flags
0
None detected

Abstract

Domain fit: AI-core · Core AI workload signals detected from paper context and implementation/artifact evidence.

Computer-use agents pay full frontier inference to re-derive routines their user has already performed, because an agent's memory today records what the user said, not what the user did. We compile passively captured screen activity into agent memory with a deterministic, zero-model pipeline: it segments a local capture stream into typed activity frames, bounded episodes carrying application, site, timing, input volume, and evidence pointers back to the raw rows, with no model in the loop, so the output is byte-identical, cacheable, and mechanically auditable. On one professional's single-user corpus of 128,756 frames over 51 active days, the compiler reduces a day of raw capture to a prompt-ready context block 86x smaller in 68 ms, and an agent reading that block answers questions about the day at 98.4% accuracy (Wilson 95% CI 91.7-99.7%) against an independent oracle, versus 66-80% for an LLM summary of the same capture, a mid-tier model reading the block matching a frontier one. The same compiler doubles as a demand-side cost instrument. Read off passive, pre-delegation human activity rather than agent rollouts, it supplies two parameters that agent-cost models assume but, to our knowledge, have not measured: the Routine Overhead Ratio R and the routine recurrence h. We report first values of R, a modeled upper bound, at 60-343x, and a delegable recurrence of 9.0% in-sample and 7.7% out-of-sample, for a realistic all-fleet token ceiling near 8%; a compiled routine replays deterministically with the model out of the loop, demonstrated live at zero model tokens on a guard-matched hit. Schema, compiler, and evaluation harness are open.

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: hot
Computer-use agents pay full frontier inference to re-derive routines their user has already performed, because an agent's memory today records what the user said, not what the user did.

Implementation

Best maintained implementation now

Recommended
Confidence: Medium
Reproducibility: Strong

Turn your workday into structured workflows agents can execute. 100% local, served over MCP.

544 stars · 36 forks · Last push Aug 11, 2026 · MIT license

  • License
  • CI
  • Dependencies
  • Docker

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Partial overlap with paper title keywords · Community adoption signal (544 stars)

Why this implementation
Confidence: medium

nossa-y/activity-frames is the best available implementation candidate based on ranking signals, but recommendation confidence is not yet high. CI workflows are present. License is declared (MIT).

Open nossa-y/activity-frames
Reproduction risks
  • No repository-level red flags were detected, but paper-specific preprocessing and hyperparameter details may still be under-specified.
  • Selected nossa-y/activity-frames as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes CI workflow signals.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: Aug 24, 2026

Ready to run

Ready to reproduce

  • Clone nossa-y/activity-frames and install dependencies from pyproject.toml.
  • CI pipeline detected, so automated tests are in place.
  • Last updated 14 days ago.
Open nossa-y/activity-frames

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/nossa-y/activity-frames.git
pip install -e .

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Research context

Tasks

Agentic tool use

Methods

Transformer

Domains

Large Language Models, AI Agents

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.