Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies
← Back to explorer

Tag: General

General papers in the current HFEPX explorer (897 papers).

Papers in tag: 897

Running a General study?

Post a Job →

Research Utility Snapshot

Evaluation Modes

  • Automatic Metrics (13)
  • Simulation Env (4)
  • Human Eval (1)

Human Feedback Types

  • Pairwise Preference (4)
  • Red Team (3)
  • Critique Edit (1)

Required Expertise

  • General (20)
MolQuest: A Benchmark for Agentic Evaluation of Abductive Reasoning in Chemical Structure Elucidation

Taolin Han, Shuang Wu, Jinghang Wang, Yuhao Zhou, Renquan Lv, Bing Zhao · Mar 26, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic MetricsSimulation Env General
  • Current scientific evaluation benchmarks predominantly rely on static, single-turn Question Answering (QA) formats, which are inadequate for measuring model performance in complex scientific tasks that require multi-step iteration and…
  • To address this gap, we introduce MolQuest, a novel agent-based evaluation framework for molecular structure elucidation built upon authentic chemical experimental data.
Does Explanation Correctness Matter? Linking Computational XAI Evaluation to Human Understanding

Gregor Baer, Chao Zhang, Isel Grau, Pieter Van Gorp · Mar 26, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic MetricsSimulation Env General
  • Higher correctness is assumed to produce better human understanding, but this link has not been tested experimentally with controlled levels.
  • These findings show that not all differences in functional correctness translate to differences in human understanding, underscoring the need to validate functional metrics against human outcomes.
Prompt Attack Detection with LLM-as-a-Judge and Mixture-of-Models

Hieu Xuan Le, Benjamin Goh, Quy Anh Tang · Mar 26, 2026 · Citations: 0

Red Team Llm As Judge General
  • In production, guardrails must mitigate these attacks under strict low-latency constraints, resulting in a deployment gap in which lightweight classifiers and rule-based systems struggle to generalize under distribution shift, while…
  • In this work, we examine whether lightweight, general-purpose LLMs can reliably serve as security judges under real-world production constraints.
FinMCP-Bench: Benchmarking LLM Agents for Real-World Financial Tool Use under the Model Context Protocol

Jie Zhu, Yimin Tian, Boyang Li, Kehao Wu, Zhongzhi Liang, Junhui Li · Mar 26, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics General
  • This paper introduces FinMCP-Bench, a novel benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLMs) in solving real-world financial problems through tool invocation of financial model context protocols.
  • Using this benchmark, we systematically assess a range of mainstream LLMs and propose metrics that explicitly measure tool invocation accuracy and reasoning capabilities.
When AI Meets Early Childhood Education: Large Language Models as Assessment Teammates in Chinese Preschools

Xingming Li, Runke Huang, Yanan Bao, Yuye Jin, Yuru Jiao, Qingyong Hu · Mar 25, 2026 · Citations: 0

Rubric Rating Automatic Metrics General
  • In this paper, we investigate whether AI can serve as a scalable assessment teammate by extracting structured quality indicators and validating their alignment with human expert judgments.
  • Our contributions include: (1) TEPE-TCI-370h (Tracing Effective Preschool Education), the first large-scale dataset of naturalistic teacher-child interactions in Chinese preschools (370 hours, 105 classrooms) with standardized ECQRS-EC and…
GameplayQA: A Benchmarking Framework for Decision-Dense POV-Synced Multi-Video Understanding of 3D Virtual Agents

Yunzhe Wang, Runhui Xu, Kexin Zheng, Tianyi Zhang, Jayavibhav Niranjan Kogundi, Soham Hans · Mar 25, 2026 · Citations: 0

Simulation Env General
  • Multimodal LLMs are increasingly deployed as perceptual backbones for autonomous agents in 3D environments, from robotics to virtual worlds.
  • We introduce GameplayQA, a framework for evaluating agentic-centric perception and reasoning through video understanding.
BeliefShift: Benchmarking Temporal Belief Consistency and Opinion Drift in LLM Agents

Praveen Kumar Myakala, Manan Agrawal, Rahul Manche · Mar 25, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise PreferenceCritique Edit Automatic Metrics General
  • LLMs are increasingly used as long-running conversational agents, yet every major benchmark evaluating their memory treats user information as static facts to be stored and retrieved.
  • We further introduce four novel evaluation metrics: Belief Revision Accuracy (BRA), Drift Coherence Score (DCS), Contradiction Resolution Rate (CRR), and Evidence Sensitivity Index (ESI).
Unbiased Reward Modeling from Implicit Feedback for LLM Alignment

Hao Wang, Haocheng Yang, Licheng Pan, Lei Shen, Xiaoxi Li, Yinuo Wang · Mar 24, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics General
  • Despite the success of reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), existing reward modeling methods largely rely on explicit feedback, which is costly to collect and difficult to scale.
  • Experiments across diverse LLM backbones and benchmark datasets validate that ImplicitRM learns accurate reward models from implicit feedback and improves performance on downstream RLHF tasks.
Towards Automated Community Notes Generation with Large Vision Language Models for Combating Contextual Deception

Jin Ma, Jingwen Yan, Mohammed Aldeen, Ethan Anderson, Taran Kavuru, Jinkyung Katie Park · Mar 23, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics General
  • However, its reliance on human contributors limits both the timeliness and scalability.
  • Finally, we introduce a new evaluation metric, Context Helpfulness Score (CHS), that aligns with user study outcomes rather than relying on lexical overlap.
TREX: Trajectory Explanations for Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning

Dilina Rajapakse, Juan C. Rosero, Ivana Dusparic · Mar 23, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference General
  • Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning (MORL) addresses this limitation by enabling agents to optimize several objectives simultaneously, explicitly reasoning about trade-offs between them.
  • Current Explainable Reinforcement Learning (XRL) methods are typically designed for single scalar rewards and do not account for explanations with respect to distinct objectives or user preferences.
SecureBreak -- A dataset towards safe and secure models

Marco Arazzi, Vignesh Kumar Kembu, Antonino Nocera · Mar 23, 2026 · Citations: 0

Red Team General
  • To provide a contribution in this scenario, this paper introduces SecureBreak, a safety-oriented dataset designed to support the development of AI-driven solutions for detecting harmful LLM outputs caused by residual weaknesses in security…
  • The dataset is highly reliable due to careful manual annotation, where labels are assigned conservatively to ensure safety.