Skip to content
← Back to explorer

AD-CARE: A Guideline-grounded, Modality-agnostic LLM Agent for Real-world Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis with Multi-cohort Assessment, Fairness Analysis, and Reader Study

Wenlong Hou, Sheng Bi, Guangqian Yang, Lihao Liu, Ye Du, Hanxiao Xue, Juncheng Wang, Yuxiang Feng, Yue Xun, Nanxi Yu, Ning Mao, Mo Yang, Yi Wah Eva Cheung, Ling Long, Kay Chen Tan, Lequan Yu, Xiaomeng Ma, Shaozhen Yan, Shujun Wang · Mar 26, 2026 · Citations: 0

How to use this page

Low trust

Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.

Best use

Background context only

What to verify

Validate the evaluation procedure and quality controls in the full paper before operational use.

Evidence quality

Low

Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a growing global health challenge as populations age, and timely, accurate diagnosis is essential to reduce individual and societal burden. However, real-world AD assessment is hampered by incomplete, heterogeneous multimodal data and variability across sites and patient demographics. Although large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in biomedicine, their use in AD has largely been confined to answering narrow, disease-specific questions rather than generating comprehensive diagnostic reports that support clinical decision-making. Here we expand LLM capabilities for clinical decision support by introducing AD-CARE, a modality-agnostic agent that performs guideline-grounded diagnostic assessment from incomplete, heterogeneous inputs without imputing missing modalities. By dynamically orchestrating specialized diagnostic tools and embedding clinical guidelines into LLM-driven reasoning, AD-CARE generates transparent, report-style outputs aligned with real-world clinical workflows. Across six cohorts comprising 10,303 cases, AD-CARE achieved 84.9% diagnostic accuracy, delivering 4.2%-13.7% relative improvements over baseline methods. Despite cohort-level differences, dataset-specific accuracies remain robust (80.4%-98.8%), and the agent consistently outperforms all baselines. AD-CARE reduced performance disparities across racial and age subgroups, decreasing the average dispersion of four metrics by 21%-68% and 28%-51%, respectively. In a controlled reader study, the agent improved neurologist and radiologist accuracy by 6%-11% and more than halved decision time. The framework yielded 2.29%-10.66% absolute gains over eight backbone LLMs and converges their performance. These results show that AD-CARE is a scalable, practically deployable framework that can be integrated into routine clinical workflows for multimodal decision support in AD.

Abstract-only analysis — low confidence

All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.

  • This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.
  • The available metadata is too thin to trust this as a primary source.

Should You Rely On This Paper?

This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.

Main weakness

This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.

Trust level

Low

Usefulness score

0/100 • Low

Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Detected

Usefulness for eval research

Adjacent candidate

Extraction confidence 35%

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

missing

None explicit

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

"Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a growing global health challenge as populations age, and timely, accurate diagnosis is essential to reduce individual and societal burden."

Evaluation Modes

partial

Automatic Metrics

Includes extracted eval setup.

"Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a growing global health challenge as populations age, and timely, accurate diagnosis is essential to reduce individual and societal burden."

Quality Controls

missing

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a growing global health challenge as populations age, and timely, accurate diagnosis is essential to reduce individual and societal burden."

Benchmarks / Datasets

missing

Not extracted

No benchmark anchors detected.

"Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a growing global health challenge as populations age, and timely, accurate diagnosis is essential to reduce individual and societal burden."

Reported Metrics

partial

Accuracy

Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.

"Across six cohorts comprising 10,303 cases, AD-CARE achieved 84.9% diagnostic accuracy, delivering 4.2%-13.7% relative improvements over baseline methods."

Human Feedback Details

  • Uses human feedback: No
  • Feedback types: None
  • Rater population: Not reported
  • Expertise required: Medicine

Evaluation Details

  • Evaluation modes: Automatic Metrics
  • Agentic eval: None
  • Quality controls: Not reported
  • Evidence quality: Low
  • Use this page as: Background context only

Protocol And Measurement Signals

Benchmarks / Datasets

No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.

Reported Metrics

accuracy

Research Brief

Metadata summary

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a growing global health challenge as populations age, and timely, accurate diagnosis is essential to reduce individual and societal burden.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a growing global health challenge as populations age, and timely, accurate diagnosis is essential to reduce individual and societal burden.
  • However, real-world AD assessment is hampered by incomplete, heterogeneous multimodal data and variability across sites and patient demographics.
  • Although large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in biomedicine, their use in AD has largely been confined to answering narrow, disease-specific questions rather than generating comprehensive diagnostic reports that support clinical decision-making.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Validate inferred eval signals (Automatic metrics) against the full paper.
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended Queries

Research Summary

Contribution Summary

  • Here we expand LLM capabilities for clinical decision support by introducing AD-CARE, a modality-agnostic agent that performs guideline-grounded diagnostic assessment from incomplete, heterogeneous inputs without imputing missing…
  • Despite cohort-level differences, dataset-specific accuracies remain robust (80.4%-98.8%), and the agent consistently outperforms all baselines.
  • In a controlled reader study, the agent improved neurologist and radiologist accuracy by 6%-11% and more than halved decision time.

Why It Matters For Eval

  • Despite cohort-level differences, dataset-specific accuracies remain robust (80.4%-98.8%), and the agent consistently outperforms all baselines.
  • In a controlled reader study, the agent improved neurologist and radiologist accuracy by 6%-11% and more than halved decision time.

Researcher Checklist

  • Gap: Human feedback protocol is explicit

    No explicit human feedback protocol detected.

  • Pass: Evaluation mode is explicit

    Detected: Automatic Metrics

  • Gap: Quality control reporting appears

    No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.

  • Gap: Benchmark or dataset anchors are present

    No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.

  • Pass: Metric reporting is present

    Detected: accuracy

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

Get Started

Join the #1 Platform for AI Training Talent

Where top AI builders and expert AI Trainers connect to build the future of AI.
Self-Service
Post a Job
Post your project and get a shortlist of qualified AI Trainers and Data Labelers. Hire and manage your team in the tools you already use.
Managed Service
For Large Projects
Done-for-You
We recruit, onboard, and manage a dedicated team inside your tools. End-to-end operations for large or complex projects.
For Freelancers
Join as an AI Trainer
Find AI training and data labeling projects across platforms, all in one place. One profile, one application process, more opportunities.