Skip to content
← Back to explorer

A Parallel Cross-Lingual Benchmark for Multimodal Idiomaticity Understanding

Dilara Torunoğlu-Selamet, Dogukan Arslan, Rodrigo Wilkens, Wei He, Doruk Eryiğit, Thomas Pickard, Adriana S. Pagano, Aline Villavicencio, Gülşen Eryiğit, Ágnes Abuczki, Aida Cardoso, Alesia Lazarenka, Dina Almassova, Amalia Mendes, Anna Kanellopoulou, Antoni Brosa-Rodríguez, Baiba Saulite, Beata Wojtowicz, Bolette Pedersen, Carlos Manuel Hidalgo-Ternero, Chaya Liebeskind, Danka Jokić, Diego Alves, Eleni Triantafyllidi, Erik Velldal, Fred Philippy, Giedre Valunaite Oleskeviciene, Ieva Rizgeliene, Inguna Skadina, Irina Lobzhanidze, Isabell Stinessen Haugen, Jauza Akbar Krito, Jelena M. Marković, Johanna Monti, Josue Alejandro Sauca, Kaja Dobrovoljc, Kingsley O. Ugwuanyi, Laura Rituma, Lilja Øvrelid, Maha Tufail Agro, Manzura Abjalova, Maria Chatzigrigoriou, María del Mar Sánchez Ramos, Marija Pendevska, Masoumeh Seyyedrezaei, Mehrnoush Shamsfard, Momina Ahsan, Muhammad Ahsan Riaz Khan, Nathalie Carmen Hau Norman, Nilay Erdem Ayyıldız, Nina Hosseini-Kivanani, Noémi Ligeti-Nagy, Numaan Naeem, Olha Kanishcheva, Olha Yatsyshyna, Daniil Orel, Petra Giommarelli, Petya Osenova, Radovan Garabik, Regina E. Semou, Rozane Rebechi, Salsabila Zahirah Pranida, Samia Touileb, Sanni Nimb, Sarfraz Ahmad, Sarvinoz Sharipova, Shahar Golan, Shaoxiong Ji, Sopuruchi Christian Aboh, Srdjan Sucur, Stella Markantonatou, Sussi Olsen, Vahide Tajalli, Veronika Lipp, Voula Giouli, Yelda Yeşildal Eraydın, Zahra Saaberi, Zhuohan Xie · Jan 13, 2026 · Citations: 0

How to use this page

Low trust

Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.

Best use

Background context only

What to verify

Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.

Evidence quality

Low

Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.

Abstract

Potentially idiomatic expressions (PIEs) construe meanings inherently tied to the everyday experience of a given language community. As such, they constitute an interesting challenge for assessing the linguistic (and to some extent cultural) capabilities of NLP systems. In this paper, we present XMPIE, a parallel multilingual and multimodal dataset of potentially idiomatic expressions. The dataset, containing 34 languages and over ten thousand items, allows comparative analyses of idiomatic patterns among language-specific realisations and preferences in order to gather insights about shared cultural aspects. This parallel dataset allows to evaluate model performance for a given PIE in different languages and whether idiomatic understanding in one language can be transferred to another. Moreover, the dataset supports the study of PIEs across textual and visual modalities, to measure to what extent PIE understanding in one modality transfers or implies in understanding in another modality (text vs. image). The data was created by language experts, with both textual and visual components crafted under multilingual guidelines, and each PIE is accompanied by five images representing a spectrum from idiomatic to literal meanings, including semantically related and random distractors. The result is a high-quality benchmark for evaluating multilingual and multimodal idiomatic language understanding.

Low-signal caution for protocol decisions

Use this page for context, then validate protocol choices against stronger HFEPX references before implementation decisions.

  • The available metadata is too thin to trust this as a primary source.
  • The abstract does not clearly describe the evaluation setup.
  • The abstract does not clearly name benchmarks or metrics.

Should You Rely On This Paper?

This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

Background context only.

Main weakness

The available metadata is too thin to trust this as a primary source.

Trust level

Low

Usefulness score

40/100 • Low

Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.

Human Feedback Signal

Detected

Evaluation Signal

Weak / implicit signal

Usefulness for eval research

Adjacent candidate

Extraction confidence 45%

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

partial

Pairwise Preference

Directly usable for protocol triage.

"Potentially idiomatic expressions (PIEs) construe meanings inherently tied to the everyday experience of a given language community."

Evaluation Modes

missing

None explicit

Validate eval design from full paper text.

"Potentially idiomatic expressions (PIEs) construe meanings inherently tied to the everyday experience of a given language community."

Quality Controls

missing

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"Potentially idiomatic expressions (PIEs) construe meanings inherently tied to the everyday experience of a given language community."

Benchmarks / Datasets

missing

Not extracted

No benchmark anchors detected.

"Potentially idiomatic expressions (PIEs) construe meanings inherently tied to the everyday experience of a given language community."

Reported Metrics

missing

Not extracted

No metric anchors detected.

"Potentially idiomatic expressions (PIEs) construe meanings inherently tied to the everyday experience of a given language community."

Rater Population

partial

Domain Experts

Helpful for staffing comparability.

"The data was created by language experts, with both textual and visual components crafted under multilingual guidelines, and each PIE is accompanied by five images representing a spectrum from idiomatic to literal meanings, including semantically related and random distractors."

Human Feedback Details

  • Uses human feedback: Yes
  • Feedback types: Pairwise Preference
  • Rater population: Domain Experts
  • Expertise required: Multilingual

Evaluation Details

  • Evaluation modes:
  • Agentic eval: None
  • Quality controls: Not reported
  • Evidence quality: Low
  • Use this page as: Background context only

Protocol And Measurement Signals

Benchmarks / Datasets

No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.

Reported Metrics

No metric terms were extracted from the available abstract.

Research Brief

Metadata summary

Potentially idiomatic expressions (PIEs) construe meanings inherently tied to the everyday experience of a given language community.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • Potentially idiomatic expressions (PIEs) construe meanings inherently tied to the everyday experience of a given language community.
  • As such, they constitute an interesting challenge for assessing the linguistic (and to some extent cultural) capabilities of NLP systems.
  • In this paper, we present XMPIE, a parallel multilingual and multimodal dataset of potentially idiomatic expressions.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Check the full text for explicit evaluation design choices (raters, protocol, and metrics).
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended Queries

Research Summary

Contribution Summary

  • In this paper, we present XMPIE, a parallel multilingual and multimodal dataset of potentially idiomatic expressions.
  • The dataset, containing 34 languages and over ten thousand items, allows comparative analyses of idiomatic patterns among language-specific realisations and preferences in order to gather insights about shared cultural aspects.
  • The result is a high-quality benchmark for evaluating multilingual and multimodal idiomatic language understanding.

Why It Matters For Eval

  • The dataset, containing 34 languages and over ten thousand items, allows comparative analyses of idiomatic patterns among language-specific realisations and preferences in order to gather insights about shared cultural aspects.
  • The result is a high-quality benchmark for evaluating multilingual and multimodal idiomatic language understanding.

Researcher Checklist

  • Pass: Human feedback protocol is explicit

    Detected: Pairwise Preference

  • Gap: Evaluation mode is explicit

    No clear evaluation mode extracted.

  • Gap: Quality control reporting appears

    No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.

  • Gap: Benchmark or dataset anchors are present

    No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.

  • Gap: Metric reporting is present

    No metric terms extracted.

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

Get Started

Join the #1 Platform for AI Training Talent

Where top AI builders and expert AI Trainers connect to build the future of AI.
Self-Service
Post a Job
Post your project and get a shortlist of qualified AI Trainers and Data Labelers. Hire and manage your team in the tools you already use.
Managed Service
For Large Projects
Done-for-You
We recruit, onboard, and manage a dedicated team inside your tools. End-to-end operations for large or complex projects.
For Freelancers
Join as an AI Trainer
Find AI training and data labeling projects across platforms, all in one place. One profile, one application process, more opportunities.