HFEPX · Eval paper review

A Hardware-Trained Generative Quantum Eigensolver for Sample-Based Quantum Diagonalization of Organotin Hydroxides up to 70 Qubits

Kunal Kumar, Kimberlee Keithley, Toshiya Iwamori, Shu Kanno +11 more

Published

Nov 10, 2026

Citations

Trust level

Low

Usefulness score

0/100 (Low)

Extraction confidence

30% (Low)

Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.

Rater population

Not reported

Signals refreshed

Nov 10, 2026

Open arXiv Find implementation Shortlist (0) RSS feed

Should you rely on this paper?

This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.

Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.

Abstract-only analysis, low confidence

All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.

This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.
The available metadata is too thin to trust this as a primary source.
The abstract does not clearly name benchmarks or metrics.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.

What to verify

Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.

Main weakness

This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.

Human feedback signal

Not explicit

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation signal

Detected

Eval setup described

Usefulness for eval research

0/100

Adjacent candidate

Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.

If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here

Human Eval Papers LLM-as-Judge Papers Pairwise Preference Papers Tool-Use Evaluation Search

Abstract

Quantum hardware can provide feedback for training circuit generators beyond the reach of exact classical simulation. We train generative quantum eigensolver (GQE) policies, transformers conditioned on molecular descriptors, to generate the state-preparation circuits for sample-based quantum diagonalization (SQD). Training runs first on a noiseless simulator and then with the IBM Heron processor ibm_kobe inside the loop, at 46 and 70 qubits ($1.2 \times 10^8$ shots for the four main training runs). A classical CCSD(T) reference energy of the training molecules enters only an admission gate and two auxiliary reward terms. During hardware training, a reward penalty prevents collapse to circuits that sample only the Hartree-Fock determinant. Policies trained on transition-metal complexes are applied without retraining to Sn(OH)$_3$-Me and its hydrates, minimal models of organotin photoresists for extreme-ultraviolet lithography, from 32 to 70 qubits. After one round of hardware sampling, followed by classical ranking and recovery of the cached counts with the molecular Hamiltonian and no further QPU calls, 27 of 28 runs at 46-70 qubits are within 15 mHa of the density-matrix renormalization group (DMRG) reference (median 4.5 mHa), and in all eight runs with an untrained control the trained policy is more accurate. At 56-70 qubits the selected circuits use 34-72 times fewer two-qubit gates than the local unitary cluster Jastrow (LUCJ) circuit transpiled for the same device. These results demonstrate that circuit generators can be trained with quantum hardware at 70 qubits.

What we could verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.