A Hardware-Trained Generative Quantum Eigensolver for Sample-Based Quantum Diagonalization of Organotin Hydroxides up to 70 Qubits
Abstract
Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
Quantum hardware can provide feedback for training circuit generators beyond the reach of exact classical simulation. We train generative quantum eigensolver (GQE) policies, transformers conditioned on molecular descriptors, to generate the state-preparation circuits for sample-based quantum diagonalization (SQD). Training runs first on a noiseless simulator and then with the IBM Heron processor ibm_kobe inside the loop, at 46 and 70 qubits ($1.2 \times 10^8$ shots for the four main training runs). A classical CCSD(T) reference energy of the training molecules enters only an admission gate and two auxiliary reward terms. During hardware training, a reward penalty prevents collapse to circuits that sample only the Hartree-Fock determinant. Policies trained on transition-metal complexes are applied without retraining to Sn(OH)$_3$-Me and its hydrates, minimal models of organotin photoresists for extreme-ultraviolet lithography, from 32 to 70 qubits. After one round of hardware sampling, followed by classical ranking and recovery of the cached counts with the molecular Hamiltonian and no further QPU calls, 27 of 28 runs at 46-70 qubits are within 15 mHa of the density-matrix renormalization group (DMRG) reference (median 4.5 mHa), and in all eight runs with an untrained control the trained policy is more accurate. At 56-70 qubits the selected circuits use 34-72 times fewer two-qubit gates than the local unitary cluster Jastrow (LUCJ) circuit transpiled for the same device. These results demonstrate that circuit generators can be trained with quantum hardware at 70 qubits.
Results and benchmarks
Quantum hardware can provide feedback for training circuit generators beyond the reach of exact classical simulation.
Benchmark evidence is limited
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 60/100, grounding 58/100, status medium.
Implementation
No direct implementation yet
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.
No verified maintained repo yet
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Start from this likely method family: Transformer.
- Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Time to first repro: a few days
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
- Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow
Reproduction readiness
No repo
No verified implementation available
- No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Validation caveat
Framework baselines
- Hugging Face Transformers training guide
Modern transformer training baseline.
- PyTorch nn.Transformer docs
Reference transformer building block implementation.
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Research context
Tasks
Scientific computing
Methods
Transformer
Domains
None detected
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.