Skip to content
← Back to explorer

ROM: Real-time Overthinking Mitigation via Streaming Detection and Intervention

Xinyan Wang, Xiaogeng Liu, Chaowei Xiao · Mar 23, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics
Open arXiv Find Implementation RSS feed Shortlist (0)

How to use this page

Low trust

Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.

Best use

Background context only

What to verify

Validate the evaluation procedure and quality controls in the full paper before operational use.

Evidence quality

Low

Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.

Abstract

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) often reach a correct solution before their long Chain-of-Thought trace ends, yet continue with redundant verification, repeated attempts, or unnecessary exploration that wastes computation and can even overturn the correct answer. We frame this behavior as a latent productive-to-redundant transition and show that it is directly reflected in hidden states: around first-correct-solution (FCS) boundaries, late-layer representations separate efficient from overthinking tokens, while boundary-permutation and position-control baselines collapse. Based on this signal, we propose ROM, a model-agnostic streaming intervention framework that monitors frozen LRMs with a lightweight hidden-state detector and intervenes at well-formed reasoning boundaries. Counterfactual Self-Correction (CSC) augments supervision with balanced wrong to correct trajectories, preserving useful pre-FCS correction while labeling only post-FCS continuation as redundant. Across MATH500, GSM8K, AIME25, and MMLU-Pro, ROM improves the overall tradeoff on both Qwen3-8B and DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B (DS-32B): on Qwen3-8B, it raises accuracy from 74.47% to 74.78% and reduces response length from 4262 to 3107 tokens; on DS-32B, it raises accuracy from 68.60% to 68.72% and reduces response length from 3062 to 2319 tokens. The same FCS-derived supervision transfers across scale and training origin, suggesting a shared long-CoT boundary rather than a backbone-specific artifact. ROM is compatible with L1, removing another 20.9-21.6% tokens at zero accuracy loss. ROM also generalizes to open-ended MMLU-Pro (+1.56 pp, 35.4% shorter) and reduces wall-clock latency by 46.5%. Code is available at https://github.com/SaFo-Lab/ROM.

Abstract-only analysis — low confidence

All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.

  • This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.
  • The available metadata is too thin to trust this as a primary source.
Human Eval Hub LLM-as-Judge Hub Pairwise Preference Hub

Should You Rely On This Paper?

This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.

Main weakness

This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.

Trust level

Low

Usefulness score

0/100 • Low

Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Detected

Usefulness for eval research

Adjacent candidate

Extraction confidence 35%

If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here:

Human Eval Hub LLM-as-Judge Hub Pairwise Preference Hub Tool-Use Eval Hub

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

missing

None explicit

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

"Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) often reach a correct solution before their long Chain-of-Thought trace ends, yet continue with redundant verification, repeated attempts, or unnecessary exploration that wastes computation and can even overturn the correct answer."

Evaluation Modes

partial

Automatic Metrics

Includes extracted eval setup.

"Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) often reach a correct solution before their long Chain-of-Thought trace ends, yet continue with redundant verification, repeated attempts, or unnecessary exploration that wastes computation and can even overturn the correct answer."

Quality Controls

missing

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) often reach a correct solution before their long Chain-of-Thought trace ends, yet continue with redundant verification, repeated attempts, or unnecessary exploration that wastes computation and can even overturn the correct answer."

Benchmarks / Datasets

missing

Not extracted

No benchmark anchors detected.

"Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) often reach a correct solution before their long Chain-of-Thought trace ends, yet continue with redundant verification, repeated attempts, or unnecessary exploration that wastes computation and can even overturn the correct answer."

Reported Metrics

partial

Accuracy

Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.

"Across MATH500, GSM8K, AIME25, and MMLU-Pro, ROM improves the overall tradeoff on both Qwen3-8B and DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B (DS-32B): on Qwen3-8B, it raises accuracy from 74.47% to 74.78% and reduces response length from 4262 to 3107 tokens; on DS-32B, it raises accuracy from 68.60% to 68.72% and reduces response length from 3062 to 2319 tokens."

Human Feedback Details

  • Uses human feedback: No
  • Feedback types: None
  • Rater population: Not reported
  • Expertise required: General

Evaluation Details

  • Evaluation modes: Automatic Metrics
  • Agentic eval: None
  • Quality controls: Not reported
  • Evidence quality: Low
  • Use this page as: Background context only

Protocol And Measurement Signals

Benchmarks / Datasets

No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.

Reported Metrics

accuracy

Research Brief

Metadata summary

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) often reach a correct solution before their long Chain-of-Thought trace ends, yet continue with redundant verification, repeated attempts, or unnecessary exploration that wastes computation and can even overturn the correct answer.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) often reach a correct solution before their long Chain-of-Thought trace ends, yet continue with redundant verification, repeated attempts, or unnecessary exploration that wastes computation and can even overturn the correct answer.
  • We frame this behavior as a latent productive-to-redundant transition and show that it is directly reflected in hidden states: around first-correct-solution (FCS) boundaries, late-layer representations separate efficient from overthinking tokens, while boundary-permutation and position-control baselines collapse.
  • Based on this signal, we propose ROM, a model-agnostic streaming intervention framework that monitors frozen LRMs with a lightweight hidden-state detector and intervenes at well-formed reasoning boundaries.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against others mentioning MMLU and GSM8K.
  • Validate inferred eval signals (Automatic metrics) against the full paper.
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended Queries

MMLU GSM8K Accuracy

Research Summary

Contribution Summary

  • Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) achieve strong accuracy on challenging tasks by generating long Chain-of-Thought traces, but suffer from overthinking.
  • We propose ROM, the first method that formulates overthinking mitigation as a streaming prediction-and-control problem.
  • Across seven benchmarks, ROM achieves the highest accuracy (93.51%), the shortest responses (1,159 tokens), and the best response efficiency.

Why It Matters For Eval

  • Across seven benchmarks, ROM achieves the highest accuracy (93.51%), the shortest responses (1,159 tokens), and the best response efficiency.

Researcher Checklist

  • Gap: Human feedback protocol is explicit

    No explicit human feedback protocol detected.

  • Pass: Evaluation mode is explicit

    Detected: Automatic Metrics

  • Gap: Quality control reporting appears

    No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.

  • Gap: Benchmark or dataset anchors are present

    No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.

  • Pass: Metric reporting is present

    Detected: accuracy

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

Get Started

Join the #1 Platform for AI Training Talent

Where top AI builders and expert AI Trainers connect to build the future of AI.
Self-Service
Post a Job
Post your project and get a shortlist of qualified AI Trainers and Data Labelers. Hire and manage your team in the tools you already use.
Create Account & Post a Job
Managed Service
For Large Projects
Done-for-You
We recruit, onboard, and manage a dedicated team inside your tools. End-to-end operations for large or complex projects.
Learn About Managed Service
For Freelancers
Join as an AI Trainer
Find AI training and data labeling projects across platforms, all in one place. One profile, one application process, more opportunities.
Join Now