Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

HFEPX · Eval paper review

Guide, Then Let Go: Gap-Adaptive Teacher Scheduling for Sparse-Reward Agentic RL

Youling Huang, Tiankuo Xu, Jiaji Liu, Tong Zheng +9 more

Published

Sep 29, 2026

Citations

0

Trust level

Moderate

Usefulness score

27/100 (Low)

Extraction confidence

55% (Moderate)

Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.

Rater population

Not reported

Signals refreshed

Sep 29, 2026

Should you rely on this paper?

This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.

Use this for comparison and orientation, not as your only source.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A benchmark-and-metrics comparison anchor.

What to verify

Validate the evaluation procedure and quality controls in the full paper before operational use.

Main weakness

No major weakness surfaced.

Human feedback signal
Not explicit
Not explicit in abstract metadata
Evaluation signal
Detected
Eval setup described
Usefulness for eval research
27/100
Adjacent candidate

Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.

Abstract

Reinforcement learning for long-horizon agents typically relies on sparse outcome-based rewards. This leads to a severe cold-start problem, as early-stage policies often fail to solve sampled tasks, leaving little useful reward signal for learning. To mitigate this problem, we use on-policy distillation (OPD) to provide token-level guidance on the student's own rollouts. We find that the benefit of this guidance depends on the performance gap between the teacher and the student. When the teacher substantially outperforms the student, distillation helps guide the student through the early training stage where outcome rewards provide little learning signal. As the gap narrows and eventually reverses, however, continued distillation becomes less beneficial and may hinder further improvement. Motivated by this observation, we propose Gap-Adaptive Teacher Scheduling (GATS), which augments the student's RL objective with an OPD term whose weight adapts to the teacher-student performance gap. Specifically, GATS gradually reduces teacher guidance as the student approaches the teacher's reference performance and withdraws it once that reference is reached. This enables GATS to leverage task-trained teachers smaller than the student, since teacher guidance is primarily needed during early training. Across ALFWorld, WebShop, and ScienceWorld with three Qwen2.5 teacher-student configurations, GATS achieves the highest average success rate among the compared methods in all three configurations, improving over reward-only GRPO by 4.37%-11.87% under matched student rollout budgets. Code is available at https://github.com/Ricardo-H/guide-then-let-go.

What we could verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

missing

None explicit

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

"Reinforcement learning for long-horizon agents typically relies on sparse outcome-based rewards."

Evaluation Modes

strong

Simulation Env

Includes extracted eval setup.

"Reinforcement learning for long-horizon agents typically relies on sparse outcome-based rewards."

Quality Controls

missing

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"Reinforcement learning for long-horizon agents typically relies on sparse outcome-based rewards."

Benchmarks / Datasets

strong

ALFWorld, WebShop

Useful for quick benchmark comparison.

"Across ALFWorld, WebShop, and ScienceWorld with three Qwen2.5 teacher-student configurations, GATS achieves the highest average success rate among the compared methods in all three configurations, improving over reward-only GRPO by 4.37%-11.87% under matched student rollout budgets."

Reported Metrics

strong

Success rate

Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.

"Across ALFWorld, WebShop, and ScienceWorld with three Qwen2.5 teacher-student configurations, GATS achieves the highest average success rate among the compared methods in all three configurations, improving over reward-only GRPO by 4.37%-11.87% under matched student rollout budgets."

Benchmarks and datasets

ALFWorldWebShop

Reported metrics

success rate
Human feedback details
Uses human feedback
No
Feedback types
None
Rater population
Not reported
Unit of annotation
Trajectory
Expertise required
Coding
Evaluation details
Evaluation modes
Simulation Env
Agentic eval
Long Horizon
Quality controls
Not reported
Evidence quality
Moderate
Use this page as
Background context only

Research brief

Metadata summary

Reinforcement learning for long-horizon agents typically relies on sparse outcome-based rewards.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key takeaways

  • Reinforcement learning for long-horizon agents typically relies on sparse outcome-based rewards.
  • This leads to a severe cold-start problem, as early-stage policies often fail to solve sampled tasks, leaving little useful reward signal for learning.
  • To mitigate this problem, we use on-policy distillation (OPD) to provide token-level guidance on the student's own rollouts.

Researcher actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Validate inferred eval signals (Long-horizon tasks) against the full paper.
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended queries

Contribution summary

  • Reinforcement learning for long-horizon agents typically relies on sparse outcome-based rewards.
  • Motivated by this observation, we propose Gap-Adaptive Teacher Scheduling (GATS), which augments the student's RL objective with an OPD term whose weight adapts to the teacher-student performance gap.
  • Across ALFWorld, WebShop, and ScienceWorld with three Qwen2.5 teacher-student configurations, GATS achieves the highest average success rate among the compared methods in all three configurations, improving over reward-only GRPO by…

Why it matters for eval

  • Reinforcement learning for long-horizon agents typically relies on sparse outcome-based rewards.

Researcher checklist

  • Human feedback protocol is explicit

    No explicit human feedback protocol detected.

  • Evaluation mode is explicit

    Detected: Simulation Env

  • Quality control reporting appears

    No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.

  • Benchmark or dataset anchors are present

    Detected: ALFWorld, WebShop

  • Metric reporting is present

    Detected: success rate