CataractSAM-2: A Domain-Adapted Model for Anterior Segment Surgery Segmentation and Scalable Ground-Truth Annotation

Mohammad Eslami, Dhanvinkumar Ganeshkumar, Saber Kazeminasab, Michael G. Morley, Michael V. Boland, Michael M. Lin, John B. Miller, David S. Friedman, Nazlee Zebardast, Lucia Sobrin, Tobias Elze · Mar 23, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics

Open arXiv Find Implementation RSS feed Shortlist (0)

How to use this page

Low trust

Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.

Best use

Background context only

What to verify

Validate the evaluation procedure and quality controls in the full paper before operational use.

Evidence quality

Low

Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.

Abstract

We present CataractSAM-2, a domain-adapted extension of Meta's Segment Anything Model 2, designed for real-time semantic segmentation of cataract ophthalmic surgery videos with high accuracy. Positioned at the intersection of computer vision and medical robotics, CataractSAM-2 enables precise intraoperative perception crucial for robotic-assisted and computer-guided surgical systems. Furthermore, to alleviate the burden of manual labeling, we introduce an interactive annotation framework that combines sparse prompts with video-based mask propagation. This tool significantly reduces annotation time and facilitates the scalable creation of high-quality ground-truth masks, accelerating dataset development for ocular anterior segment surgeries. We also demonstrate the model's strong zero-shot generalization to glaucoma trabeculectomy procedures, confirming its cross-procedural utility and potential for broader surgical applications. The trained model and annotation toolkit are released as open-source resources, establishing CataractSAM-2 as a foundation for expanding anterior ophthalmic surgical datasets and advancing real-time AI-driven solutions in medical robotics, as well as surgical video understanding.

Abstract-only analysis — low confidence

All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.

This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.
The available metadata is too thin to trust this as a primary source.

Human Eval Hub LLM-as-Judge Hub Pairwise Preference Hub

Should You Rely On This Paper?

This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.

Main weakness

This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.

Trust level

Low

Usefulness score

0/100 • Low

Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Detected

Usefulness for eval research

Adjacent candidate

Extraction confidence 35%

If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here:

Human Eval Hub LLM-as-Judge Hub Pairwise Preference Hub Tool-Use Eval Hub

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.